Frage von LA2008:
Hi together,
I consider myself a new camcorder to purchase. Application should be family memories / Urlausbaufnahmen and they will be next to analyze the golf swing are. The family pictures usually NOT Tripod for use, because the shooting is not the main focus is with child and man enough to drag anyway has.
Today I heard an old MVX1i, I would like to share what modern wants. My pain threshold is about 700 euros.
Now do you get for the price so much-almost the HV20. Since I am an HD Ready Television 16:9 and have a PC with Core 2 Duo and 2GB memory, HDV would have an option. On the other bneötige I antürlcih synonymous new SW.
Now I have heard that you only from HDV cameras from Tripod to use, because they are still sensitive to blurring than MiniDV. Is that correct? I've synonymous in this forum read that the HV20 HDV cameras and other movement in the resolution is not so great to be. Is that so?
Would my application for a proper MiniDV Camera is the better choice?
Thank you for your tips!
Lars
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Now I have heard that you only from HDV cameras from Tripod to use, because they are still sensitive to blurring than MiniDV. Video editors have apparently this rumor spreads in magazines, so you can just still shots. It would be better then instead of a video camera with a digital-clippers to buy ...
zum Bild
Antwort von hannes:
@ Bruno-Peter
> So you can only still shots.
Your anger is understandable and comprehensible. Even worse, I am about these trainees dilettantes in the video leaves such crap mortise. The Lars (and us all) it helps but not really next.
You can do it better! Hence my plea: go the topic again.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
The law has Hannes Lars ...
Lasse Dich by such rumors are not upset!
You must take steps to beautiful loose-and shake-free recording in HDV to enjoy. I create without s.Einbein or tripod static stick to them. I dynamically videos in HDV synonymous in the 3rd Dimension, ie in forward / seitwärst / backwards or even full-motion. All you need is a fast-responding in the Autofocus HDV Camera and a craft floating facility for a few ¬ uros and a wide angle attachment. Lasse not persuade you, you have to to 200-800 or more ¬ uros lie down.
What I do with the 3.Dimension for HDV recordings and in the post-production, you can
Antwort von hannes:
@ Bruno-Peter
You write:
> The ball joint of Cullmann is very easy, it is therefore very well ....
It shifted but the turning point very clearly to the bottom.
If the case is not very unstable?
I thought: turning point as close as possible s.der Camera.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Therefore you have to trim the weight lay deeper.
As I wrote, roughly austrimmen so that after deflection of the trim weight in 1-2-3 Bewegungsauslenkungen everything is perpendicular.
Basically, however, s.die Camera close up, if you find an appropriate component,
then you can build much more compact ... The 4-ct-Alustab is 280mm long with me.
From the camera base plate to the middle joint is about 55mm.
Antwort von besucher2007:
Hello Lars,
With the Canon HV10/HV20 to succeed in the wide area synonymous very quiet recordings out of hand, because of the Canon optical stabilizer works fantastically. My HV10 can I still synonymous in the middle focal length range keep quiet. The electronic stability of my SonyHC1 works comparatively not so good. Otherwise, I think it is similar to the Bruno-Peter. But try and have a look in some business models.
Greeting
Detlev
Antwort von Benny.:
Now I have heard that you only from HDV cameras from Tripod to use, because they are still sensitive to blurring than MiniDV. Is that correct? I've synonymous in this forum read that the HV20 HDV cameras and other movement in the resolution is not so great to be. Is that so?
Lars SD has 720 pixels horizontally and 1440 pixels HDV, exactly twice as much.
Since both formats with 50i (50 fields per sec) are used,
do I conclude from this that the horizontal "swing speed" or
techn. Angular velocity of rotation of the camera when compared to HDV
SD exactly half the size may be to the same movement resolution
to obtain.
That means we must move for the same resolution in the HDV Recording
the camera is only half as fast moving as recording with SD.
That means synonymous but that the people at the same resolution in the motion picture is only half as fast can move. This
means for the picture instead of food shot
or Halbtotale shot.
Since one in HDV anyway so close to the object hierarchy must be expected
this is not a problem. (SD image -> TV, HDV> movie)
A tripod is necessary HDV So rather than with SD.
Gruss
Benny
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Since one in HDV anyway so close to the object hierarchy must be expected
this is not a problem. That do you mean, but only for
playback, not for the
recording? BG
Andreas
Antwort von Benny.:
Since one in HDV anyway so close to the object hierarchy must be expected
this is not a problem.
That do you mean, but only for playback, not for the recording?
BG
Andreas I am of course already in the recording.
Example: With SD when I rotate a handball game, mostly for example, three
Players in the Picture had. With HDV, I do not need as much zoom,
here I get the same sharpness in the top half team,
bringing you much more in the spotlight and the game has a much better track
can.
Why do you play for?
Gruss
Benny
Antwort von LA2008:
Hi together,
Have ever thank you for the advice.!
Greetings, Lars
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Why do you play for?
Because for me the composition of the picture completely Resolutiondes chips sausage should be. What in 16:9 (SD) well composed, it is synonymous with the same cutout in 16:9 (HD) to be well composed. Although you can see more details, but the overall aesthetic impression is confirmed by the screen layout and the color is reached, rather than by the very last detail.
Otherwise, there would be in SD so even less anschaubare movies :-)))
Antwort von Axel:
Because for me the composition of the picture completely Resolutiondes chips sausage should be. What in 16:9 (SD) well composed, it is synonymous with the same cutout in 16:9 (HD) to be well composed. Although you can see more details, but the overall aesthetic impression is confirmed by the screen layout and the color is reached, rather than by the very last detail.
Otherwise, there would be in SD so even less anschaubare movies :-))) That was the mistake of monumental films shot until aside. Even Blofeld underground control center has always been boring, action comes in better interpersonal dimensions (of emotions, or even ActionScript to mention gender). So, no preference whether SD or HD: Ran s.den bacon.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
I think there is a perhaps a misunderstanding: with "details" I thought the aphids on the pot, not close-ups and close-ups! I referred only to the things that are in HD suddenly become visible ... as synonymous of sloppy Kulissenbau :-)
