Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hier geht es zur Newsmeldung: HTML 5 showcases more of Apple Resources
Antwort von Axel:
Microsoft is not the great monopolist that subjugates everything that does not add voluntary. The "offer" of the famous operating system - is of
quite significant except the license fee - actually open source.
Only with the policy of everything Apple is officially licensed and certified. Although even the hacks and cracks at Apple are more beautiful than anywhere else, we know that only with originals - and that is: Which of Apple or Apple s.denen mitverdient - one is on the sunny side of life. A person receiving all the songs of iTunes and all apps through the Apple Store is synonymous never infected in the future. Even if
everyone finally has an iPhone or iPad.
I propose a new slogan for Windows before.
Windows: Computers for the rest of us!
Antwort von Janosch25768:
@ Axel
And what do the Linux user should * G *
Apple is my only interest Publishing products ... product policy, etc is simply a dictator ...
A pity though, that you look at the examples in HTML5 Apple can look only with Safari. Would be possible for Newcomers * cough * synonymous interesting if you would see in advance what you are anschafft with HTML5 and Apple * G *
I have recently made the test again on a 64 bit Linux Mint between HTML5 and Adobe Flash on Youtube in 720p and the utilization rate was nearly identical. I personally will live and work with both. Flash is so deeply integrated into the Web, which lasts until something is banned ...
LG
Antwort von Axel:
A pity though, that you look at the examples in HTML5 Apple can look only with Safari. Would be possible for Newcomers * cough * synonymous interesting if you would see in advance what you are anschafft with HTML5 and Apple * G * Safari's is synonymous for free
Antwort von Mantas:
why do you download safari da? opera can not long HTML5.
s.mann apple. Pure dictatorship
Antwort von WoWu:
With Quicktime there's nothing else ....
Apple seems to have the mission to try to install QT worldwide as THE video format. Why? Because they say or do, not because there is a good reason, or can anyone tell me why as DVCProHD in QT first must be converted if you want to use it?
Apple has decided to not support Vidoformate more, they would be great to do this. Instead, video producer by Apple to address ... which some are indeed synonymous followed obediently.
And you can hear the voices that that's a great thing, media recording directly from the camera format .....
My God .... we do for several years with many different formats .... So where should there be the innovation? Whether this is SDHC, P2 or SxS. that's all plug and play in the various NLEs.
But now camera manufacturers are to be addressed by Apple.
Let's see how Apple behaves in terms of AVC-I or AVCHD. I bet that it will run again only on Quicktime ... if Apple is ever moved.
But fortunately there are indeed several other very good systems, no preference whether the AVID, VEGAS, EDIUS (oA) is. Apple Final Cut Pro with long gone ahead. But the next version is supposed to "be awesome". Well, since one can only tremble for joy.
Synonymous interesting is the fact that Apple devices, the Batteries are not interchangeable .... how long it will take, then, to us Apple limits the lifetime of their devices .... Unfortunately, then the software and it is the Sun proprietary files that they only run on Apple devices ... super future.
Apple is now pursuing a "governing philosophy" and has long gone the USER in mind "but still only the" share holder ". Stupid User ....
The motto at Apple (by the way synonymous with Sony) is not something
"Whatever you want, that's what we'll give you .... it is rather:
"whatever's good for us, that's what we'll give you." Only good that finally is time the debate going on ... has indeed gone on long enough.
