Frage von der_demonstrant:let's take s.es would a hacker be able to double the bitrate of the HV40 (; or simply to increase) would join the image processor and I of course realize that you need a HDMI capture recorder da band would not do that on higher bitrate appropriate would come to me .......... we went only to the image processor, the thought of me when I saw the 550d 4k hack thread have.
apparently lies in the small cams synonymous much more potential that could be tickling via firmware hack out some if the Sun join in overheating of the processor technology.
Antwort von prime:
let's take s.es would a hacker be able to double the bitrate of the HV40 (or simply to increase) would join the image processor and I of course realize that you need a HDMI capture recorder da band would not do that on higher bitrate would be useful .......... The bit rate of the HDMI signal to double? By how much on how much? The signal it has become 'almost' uncompressed ... what a stupid: P
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
I would much prefer if there was a really cheap Dockrecorder
Regards Rolf ...
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Der_demonstrant
No, the time that with higher data rate synonymous always accompanied a better picture is long gone and relates synonymous only to the data reduction.
Only new codecs are thus synonymous not better, because necessary for better pictures other profile would be that were not implemented.
Regarding the image processing synonymous hacks do little good because the algorithms must be implemented to produce a better picture first.
Hackers are generally not in a position to implement new algorithms and Manufacturer not implement better algorithms, the only way for Choice, which can "lift" could be.
Man I have so hacks watch very closely to what they do. Many a hack is synonymous not only not useful, but sometimes synonymous counterproductive. And hacks are often synonymous "placebos" by the motto ... more bitrate must be a better picture, yes.
As far as the HDMI interface, so the pictures are out anyway as transparent as they can be.
Data reduction, done that already in the sub-sampling, except once. So there is nothing to hack.