Frage von Andreas_Müller:
Hello together,
how do you get these
http://vimeo.com/hd#4240369
Video quality itself out? That is unbelievable. Sure, a lot of relatively
static content, but still impressive. My Snosh with
self-encoded videos are not nearly as out.
Thanks and regards,
Andreas
Antwort von Markus Fuenfrocken:
Andreas Müller wrote:
> How do you get these
> http://vimeo.com/hd#4240369
>
> Video quality itself out? That is unbelievable. Clear,
> A lot of relatively static content, but still
> Impressive. My self-coded with Snosh Videos
> Are not nearly as out.
Hi,
what do you live exactly? The codec quality (it's H.264 with Flash), or
the quality of the animation? An HD-Resolutiongerenderte
Computer animation (is not even full HD) should be already encoded with H.264
a good quality result - what exactly you so surprised?
Gruß,
Markus
Antwort von Benjamin Spitschan:
Andreas Müller wrote:
> Video quality itself out? That is unbelievable. Sure, a lot of relatively
> Static content, but still impressive. My Snosh with
> Self-encoded videos are not nearly as out.
The material comes with 1280x720 pixels at 25 * fps * (in 50 fps
of 720p), therefore, has so schonmal half the uncompressed data rate as
true HD (720p or 1080i). As the VP6 codec is used. The
Gesamtdate is 1.75 Mbit / s. I believe then, no trick
more, if the encoder on animation tunes, ie in contrast to
Coding of natural images, the low frequencies (color) grossly
quantized in favor of the high frequencies (edges).
Regards, Benjamin
Antwort von Christian Stubbs:
Andreas Müller
writes:
> As I said in my other response already wrote: There's so synonymous
> Plenty of real videos :-)
My impression:
VP6 has NEN fairly good "DENOISER". If too blockig is, he will start,
Areas weichzuzeichnen completely determined, although it usually creates
with "unimportant" areas to start. It has been less
Kompromierungsartefake, but the details are still lost.
Antwort von Benjamin Spitschan:
Andreas Müller wrote:
>> As the VP6 codec is used.
>
> How do I get?
FLV Player.
>> I think then, no trick
>> More, if the encoder on animation tunes, ie in contrast to
>> Coding of natural images of the low frequencies (color) grossly
>> Quantized in favor of the high frequencies (edges).
>
> As I said in my other response already wrote: There's so synonymous
> Plenty of real videos :-)
[1] has about 5.8 Mbit / s and not much surprises me. At 24fps and
the right parameters creates the H.264 as well. x.264 is approximately
deep tune.
[2], however, is running with 1.58 Mbit / s, but has synonymous only 12fps. That
is not so, because the player is temporally interpolated and "Smooth"
Intermediate images.
[3] needs 1.37 Mbit / s at 25fps, but even more significantly
Artefacts and consists of a lot of slow motion, which the motion estimation
can work more efficiently.
In any case, lots top movies, and yes, the quality is
impressive (see the sign-off almost sculptural in [4]) - but
No magic ;-).
Regards, Benjamin
PS: On my calculator gives the Flash Player the videos already
runterskaliert again, in reality, yet again significantly
larger. Is it synonymous with you?
[1] http://vimeo.com/hd#4039576
[2] http://vimeo.com/hd#2078991
[3] http://vimeo.com/hd#3122082
[4] http://vimeo.com/hd#4167288
Antwort von Andreas Erber:
Benjamin Spitschan wrote:
> PS: On my calculator gives the Flash Player the videos already
> Runterskaliert again, in reality, yet again significantly
> Greater. Is it synonymous with you?
Noe (26 "1920 * 1200) and for me the first block synonymous throughout tidy. Since
I'm better of 720p material used.
LG Andy
