Infoseite // High / low depth of field with your camcorder to achieve?

Frage von Paul*Berlin:


I once hoped that the issue fits into this category! :)

I have a rotation in the near future, when I want to realize a setting in which two people standing several meters apart, but both are in focus. As I can with my Panasonic HDC-SD 300 to achieve the greatest possible depth of field? I know that the smallest possible aperture is helpful, but it is better to close s.vorderen object to stand and use a zoom or to feel more comfortable, next object are removed from the front and ranzuzoomen?

And then I would question whether there is a smallest possible depth of field with existing equipment, further hints next big Aperture.



Antwort von B.DeKid:

One can try out wonderfully with two bottles on a table.

But since I'd much zooming.

MfG
B. DeKid



Antwort von rush:

joar ..

everything should be sharp? then not as much zoom Wide angle and + closed dazzled (blinded high value).

only a part of the picture should be sharp? as long focal length and very open-blende (small aperture)

The distances of the people you need to try an bissl then adjust according to the focal length



Antwort von beiti:

"Paul Berlin *" wrote: to stand close s.vorderen object and use a zoom, or feel more comfortable, next object are removed from the front and ranzuzoomen? With the shorter focal You get more depth of field. If you want to optimally exploit the depth of field, you should also at a point between the two people focus (clue:) s.der front a little closer than s.der back person.

However, you should always consider the perspective synonymous. With a short focal distance and a short person is the rear considerably smaller than the front, which may be desired or not synonymous. The longer the focal and the greater the shooting distance, the more similar the image size to the people.



Antwort von Paul*Berlin:

Thanks for pointing out the Perspeltive, but this effect would be particularly desirable in this case, or he is just the reason why I then asked.
Since this sequence is, however, represent a dream sequence, one might ask, if necessary synonymous everything blurred. But that would be the worst solution, because it is supposed to recognize what synonymous, right? :) Bin mal gespannt, as it will ultimately ...