Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hier geht es zur Newsmeldung: High resolution images for Final Cut Pro X user interface
Antwort von ruessel:
Looks strong after a 58, - from ¬ Program ....
Antwort von mekkie:
Glasses can sometimes work wonders, I've heard!
Just ask the optician you trust.
Message Mekki
Antwort von Axel:
Looks strong after a 58, - from ¬ Program ....
Antwort von domain:
At best, if a program is easy to operate a maximum.
Have we seen anything yet. First, programmed in assembly language, then back in the comfortable high-level languages, such as modified in Excel, where you can specify only one has what one wants.
In all cases, but the implementation was done on the compiler or interpreter, and then ultimately through a GUI in the machine code.
In all cases, it has a roar but synonymous, where the respective professionals, who were then swim away their special skills such as fur.
Antwort von freezer:
http://youtu.be/-77beFICSlI
Since one can easily see the new interface.
noSpur From Baby NLE. But some seem to have to live out here so its anti-Apple-compulsive neurosis.
There are plenty of alternative software package for those who do not work with FCPX. Every pro knows how it is for every task the right tool.
Antwort von Grede:
At best, if a program is easy to operate a maximum.
Have we seen anything yet. First, programmed in assembly language, then back in the comfortable high-level languages, such as modified in Excel, where you can specify only one has what one wants.
In all cases, but the implementation was done on the compiler or interpreter, and then ultimately through a GUI in the machine code.
In all cases, it has a roar but synonymous, where the respective professionals, who were then swim away their special skills such as fur.
Even though I digress from the real issue:
Explain your views your remarks.
Assembler - Excel? Excel should, in your opinion, be a development of a programming language?
Programming code -> Compiler -> GUI -> machine code?
Somehow, all this gives no sense to me.
Mfg
Mathias (former programmer)
Antwort von filmmaker001:
On the comments of many colleagues here, you realize that they have unfortunately not understood what it actually does the editing ...
But any software company will come out that a very complicated editing program invented so that some PRO-cutter again to specify proud that they can operate this program at all difficult.
It is just a tool that should lead to a good movie.
Antwort von WoWu:
At best, if a program is easy to operate a maximum.
Have we seen anything yet. First, programmed in assembly language, then back in the comfortable high-level languages, such as modified in Excel, where you can specify only one has what one wants.
In all cases, but the implementation was done on the compiler or interpreter, and then ultimately through a GUI in the machine code.
In all cases, it has a roar but synonymous, where the respective professionals, who were then swim away their special skills such as fur.
Even though I digress from the real issue:
Explain your views your remarks.
Assembler - Excel? Excel should, in your opinion, be a development of a programming language?
Programming code -> Compiler -> GUI -> machine code?
Somehow, all this gives no sense to me.
Mfg
Mathias (former programmer)
Throw a look at the Apple development tool from
Quartz Composer, then you know what is meant by domain.
http://developer.apple.com/graphicsimaging/quartz/quartzcomposer.html
@ Filmmaker001
But any software company will come out that a very complicated editing program invented so that some PRO-cutter again to specify proud
that's the point .... not really but if a NLE in the format output only the choice between Youtube ... Apple TV has to (which is just one example) are sufficient, then it is simple, but not with distance. And if Apple wants to grow new editors, the aim of the iPod or any stamps on the Internet, then they had the liberty, but must not interfere s.Produkt criticism of all those who may have different product target in mind.
Antwort von Axel:
On the comments of many colleagues here, you realize that they have unfortunately not understood what it actually does the editing ...
....
It is just a tool that should lead to a good movie.
If at any time the products we buy, just yet meet a clearly defined purpose, kiss me awake. ! Meanwhile, this applies to the Yes oatmeal that I eat with milk and Yes-no-name cheap bananas, that's it (Yes! toilet crepe made of recycled toilet paper I forget: Only one sheet).
But the idea presented here is similar indeed, an orgy of Apple Easter service in St. Peter.
Sums it up better. The respective correct working procedures, provided they come with all the programs to the target. We would be poorer by a concern if it was only today Avid. But we are not knitted.
But any software company will come out that a very complicated editing program invented so that some PRO-cutter again to specify proud that they can operate this program at all difficult.
No, to defend the old, existing Programs. Because they work that is yet. I would be interested to know editors at all how many have relatively new software. When they should have leisure synonymous to join the whole arms race (or, now, betting disarmament)? Or a reason?
With newcomers it is different. Amateur, Semi-and small-professionals, the many "lone wolves" want a P (personal)-NLE, not necessarily one that is in TV studio canteen of the old hands in an antique version (of software / hardware as the rabbit is praised).
Recently I spoke with a former colleague from the WDR: fewer permanent employees, more and more "free", more and more individual fighters, even while cutting ...
.... but if a NLE in the format output only the choice between Youtube ... Apple TV has to (which is just one example) are sufficient, then it is simple, but not with distance. And if Apple wants to grow new editors, the aim of the iPod or any stamps on the Internet, then they had the liberty, but must not interfere s.Produkt criticism of all those who may have different product target in mind.
In hell, I'll read your book, rather WoWu. You, however, is certain that Facebook will live read your comments and get in eternity, of vfxhansi ...
Antwort von WoWu:
:-) Looking forward ... but he will not understand.
But, Axel, how do you know that you come to hell ... we do not hope yet .... Hansi is already there but ... and how beautiful you please communicate? No details, the gross level there is ..
:-))
Antwort von Backslash:
... Live and read comments received, in eternity, of vfxhansi
This can be anyone really want and define an entirely new kind of hell.
Apple has acted consistently and true to his self-image, its Pro users found the chair in front of the door.
The price, the look and the built-in automatic modes allow Apple overtly rather point to the amateur market.
Mass must be generated.
Well, the thing with the gnawed fruit is powerful ever went wrong and left us all brewed here.
\
Antwort von Freddi:
... In hell, I'll read your book, rather WoWu. You, however, is certain that Facebook will live read your comments and get in eternity, of vfxhansi ...
:-)
Antwort von freezer:
that's the point .... not really but if a NLE in the format output only the choice between Youtube ... Apple TV has to (which is just one example) are sufficient, then it is simple, but not with distance. And if Apple wants to grow new editors, the aim of the iPod or any stamps on the Internet, then they had the liberty, but must not interfere s.Produkt criticism of all those who may have different product target in mind.
And where exactly in your crystal ball, you read out that Apple intends it?
Do not be evil WoWu, so I your technical knowledge of sensors, etc guess, but here you write just your prejudices and aversions out against Apple, which are substantiated by even noFakten.
Just check out the video links to the next I have posted above, there are a lot s.Infos - and each is contrary to the insinuations that you have posted.
And the air is thin for the old Cutter - not because they are bad at their craft, but because the deadlines are shorter and more efficiency is needed - and this one needs the new tools to help you. And old horses like noneuen way. This has always been so and eventually we are the old must give way to horses and the young.
Antwort von WoWu:
Rober, with all due respect, that is at least as violent speech without those of you even been calling for substance.
I have the information very closely and probably already in anticipation of that approach is probably closer s.iMovie than is currently synonymous with iMovie me in advance, as well as with the new foundation based on the IOS video engine employs.
So far there are nowirklich reliable evidence that the requirements of the (old) broadcast world actually covered satisfactory. More are indications that hold face detection, and anti Frabkorrekturautomationen shaky catchment functions.
Any professional editor knows that such things still should be subject to very close scrutiny, because the human eye is rarely satisfactory of replacing an automatic function.
With these features, Apple proclaimed speaks exactly to the group, of which I expect that the product was tailored to them.
If you've got there other, more extensive information, other than the meager presentation, let me have some.
Furthermore, you seem to have read that I do see advantages synonymous, which, if they turn out to be useful to move me to the program synonymous in our mobile operations use. We have not only used old "bones" here but synonymous young, very ambitious editor who in the above-mentioned functions synonymous looked funny.
But tell me, what would you use in the broadcast section, a face recognition?
Do you think the essential feature in an NLE?
What feature would distinguish the new FCPX your opinion significantly from FCP7?
Compared with other already s.Markt located NLEs, where is the difference?
What we were as presented yesterday, first the replacement of a 10-year-old GUIs and a market price, which presumably includes synonymous only the basic framework, and yet next and hopefully the elimination of all the old bugs that Apple is still owed, since it is QT.
But as I said. let's wait for the delivery, then we'll see where the train. Is he in the pro direction, I am the last person to not ride takes you. We have Final Cut Pro only left out, because Apple has so far refused to support major commercial codecs. And our decision has given us right because we successfully for many years to earn money with it.
Apple should now decide the commercial market again (not proprietary) to support such ideas are of course new to the test. To do this, but first the product you are there, that is more than iPod and iPhone owners happy.
