Frage von Budoudo:
Hello,
How the score was on the Canon 550D. The big financial problem is (probably will not only for me) three good "favorable" Lenses for the beginning.
What have been released since the VDSLR cameras put out a tip?
Thanks for your opinion ...
Budoudo
Antwort von pilskopf:
So yes, I think, have not tried it myself ever, that the Canon 50mm 1.8 makes an excellent impression for 100 ¬. http://www.vimeo.com/9873236 a recent example.
Antwort von Mink:
Not bad (85mm 1.4): http://www.foto-tip.pl/sklep/samyang_85mm_f1_4_if_mc-p-1354.html
The Canon 50mm 1.8 is good ... especially for the price ....
Antwort von Nepomuk Hiroshima:
Can you recommend the 50mm f1.8. Although I myself not so long on the road with my 7D, but the first impression of the lens is schonmal well.
Small impression http://www.vimeo.com/9860082
Antwort von pilskopf:
Can you recommend a good and cheap 12mm? I'd just something better than a 17mm if I should buy me a 17-55mm, which I could but quite vielleich exchange by lenses.
The aim is:
12 mm or änhlich
50mm
85mm
for 50mm and 85mm so I'd already 2 candidates, perhaps to save me a Tamron 17-55 would give me a good, perhaps synonymous get a little zoom lens for the smaller s.12mm focal length to 20mm or so. Maybe someone has a tip.
Antwort von Budoudo:
for the 50mm and 85mm so I'd already 2 candidates Heyhey, do not steal my thread :-)))
Seriously, I have thought of just synonymous, which were two of them now, and even recommended a nice WW and then fit I would say.
Gruss
Budoudo
Antwort von Mink:
Tokina 11-16 ....
http://www.idealo.de/preisvergleich/OffersOfProduct/886382_-af-11-16mm-f2-8-canon-tokina.html
Antwort von B.DeKid:
What would be cheap in your eyes for 12mm?
MfG
B. DeKid
http://de.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/tamron/ check back regularly as boys
Antwort von pilskopf:
cool page. So I am shooting wide Anglezum important. Also because of the Steadicam, the SLD may therefore be well pleased, a little zoom would be nice. Photos should succeed now so synonymous, of course.
I think price ¬ S.300. Please do not cut if that is unrealistic. : D But I can see already that are more expensive.
Tamron 10-24mm F / 3.5-4.5 SP Di II LD Aspherical IF Lens for Canon
The Tamron has such interesting focal ne.
Antwort von Budoudo:
What would be cheap in your eyes I can not now say so.
But a question s.Dich: The 20mm lens so I would like to use for Steadycamfahrten. Have I understood correctly, if I increase the aperture, I have a large focus range and so, of course, more room / exercise room with the Steadycam. Can I help you with this background, a recommendation?
Antwort von pilskopf:
Clearly, a WW with good depth of field is desired. I know it is not from experience, no idea whether or not makes a WW nor what Aperture. I'd be interested synonymous.
Antwort von masterseb:
a cheap ultra wide angle lenses make you a fish eye and at best a tonne. one of the best, almost distortion-Wide angle (14mm) is of canon and costs about 2000euro. max. Wide angle distortion is barely affordable with the tamron 17-50mm (btw THE standard optics). furthermore: sigma 30mm f1.4 very well. an old analog nikon 35th. is also very good. assuming you have the mount adapter. Do not forget to 1.6x crop. S.der 7D are 50mm or 85mm already 550D!
btw gibts here already numerous threads optik
Antwort von Mink:
Depth of computer time googling .... synonymous interest for any Steadycamaktionen .... ner with the dslr and are in fact not so wide-angle objective realize nem not easy to ....
Antwort von Budoudo:
How about for example, with this set-Lens:
Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 IS:
http://www.warsteiner-fotoversand.eu/product_info.php?info=p4581_Canon-EOS-550D-18-55-IS-Kit.html
And then the above 50mm of Canon and the 85mm of Samyang ...
Antwort von pilskopf:
But just under 18mm in 29mm focal 7d or 550D. But I want to have 22mm because of the Steadifahrten. The lens is what you postes but the kit lens I think that there is for the 500 to do so.
Antwort von Budoudo:
The lens is what you postes but the kit lens I think that there is for the 500 to do so. Also, yes.
But true ... we are looking very next ^ ^
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Hmm interessting question
So, since the closed aperture greater depth of field is created by prolonged shutter speed so Physikalisch seen correctly - with photos.
But we now speak of film recordings.
So I can say one thing which is there for me no real difference to the result I am now about 35mmwenn test times.
So hot .... want to With nem WW DoF is hardly possible (unless you hold the lens directly s.das motif distance well below 1m) anyway because they usually keep a distance between himself and the object, and thus the "infinity" edge of using WW.
...................
I must admit that I am, however, synonymous since less of the theory of man rather than as practitioners and for action sports shots only on WW since I sit so that was always on the safe Page / bin. (If I am on inline skates next to a BMX rider as herfahre)
Perhaps Bernd. domain or time since WoWu explain the theoretical part.
.....................
Conclusion on my part:
You want to make Steadycam shots ensures focal ne way to make the 19 to 24 mm, half the Aperture and you will get good light.
I always try the Aperture min 1 / 3 or close to half because then I almost always get the best picture quality.
MfG
B. DeKid
PS: For the price would be so cheap in my view everything will cost somewhere between 300 - 700 euros - that's yet to get a relatively good glass. There are ne fixed Lens (M42) of Sigma or with Zenitar 16mm to 1:2.8 which should be quite good according to reviews - perso. I was not yet in hand.
Antwort von rush:
in the video area, I'd probably think actually more like lichstarken lenses ausschau ... especially if you value on the so-called "film look" lay.
one 3.5er - 5.6er loses s.lang end occupied a very nice amount s.light .. And you shall synonymous leeway in matters bokeh.
do you have focal lengths generally have experience in dealing with?
because you obviously read a lot in the net ... And I've synonymous to me then for my fuji (nikon mount) bought a good but cheap 50mm ... the problem was simple - the focal length does not suit me at all and the part was only in the cabinet has been sold until it :-)
will be called - for the top is a fast zoom in connection with one or another is certainly a useful festbrennweite sache.
order weitwinkel gibts now synonymous for example, a 10-20s dazzle with continuous 3.5 of sigma ...
And then there's still a synonymous of 8mm fisheye walimex / Samyang ... think that was mentioned here ...
if you have enough light anyway you will have dimmed and then the ww range of sharpness with no problems .... because it does safe synonymous' ne older lens:)
what you should still keep in mind ... If you ever want to change some of Use full format lenses you need to complete the image circle draw ... many of the new optics are partly counted only for aps-c sensors and can accordingly only with these cameras will be used ...
Antwort von Budoudo:
do you have focal lengths generally have experience in dealing with? No, honestly I'm like so many in the past to these issues successfully come around.
I read straight through my video - and Stillimage forums for a little more Durchblick obtained. I know a professional photographer (5D), which has agreed to explain to me the whole detail.
Well, the big open question is now the lens issue or the WW issue. But a question about Samyang: that is sold as synonymous Walimex 85mm? Under Samyang I can not find any offers ...
Antwort von rush:
But a question about Samyang: that is sold as synonymous Walimex 85mm? Under Samyang I can not find any offers ... Yes right ... This is the same lens ... There's still synonymous of Falcon ... it is basically a walimex oem lens and the stop with his own schriftzug has in offer.
the 85er as synonymous the 8mm fisheye
85mm I personally find much more pleasant than 50mm s.einer crop camera like yours canon ... but that is synonymous geschmackssache
Antwort von Budoudo:
85mm I personally find much more pleasant than 50mm s.einer crop camera like yours canon ... but that is synonymous geschmackssache Which cover focal lengths (to the largest possible spectrum) would you recommend it?
I have often found the statement: In 90 or 95% I use the 50mm ...
Antwort von B.DeKid:
What you need
24 / 35 / 50 / 85 / 100 (or 135) / 250 (or 300) mm
....................................
What synonymous is always good
under 20mm and over 200 or 300
....................................
Special optics
Macro, Fisheye (WW are almost all under 16mm with "Kreisabschattung"), "Extreme" Fixed Telelenses
....................................
Bzgl. Zoom lenses can say
An ever-Optics in the area on it Almost 20 - 35 (or 70)
A 70-200 (10-300)
You can use synonymous 35 - 100 (105) zoom lens but are of limited use
APS C optimized Lenses I like perso. maybe, not as MF Zoom still ok otherwise only buy FF lenses!.
FB optics are dearer to me than zooms.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von rush:
Bzgl. Zoom lenses can say
An ever-Optics in the area on it Almost 20 - 35 (or 70)
A 70-200 (10-300)
MfG
B. DeKid Can I emphasize it ...
Zoommäßig I use almost exclusively a 17-50mm 2.8 and a 70-200mm 2.8 .... is ideal for portraits. I do not need much more.
In addition, even a Wide Anglenach below and then the past for my photographic needs :-)
Even if I put my '85 1.8 and my 30mm 1.4 very like - they are more often in the camera bag ... but if I someday one should VDSLR my own name - they certainly come back to use my 50 1.8 ;-) I vllt. Used 3 times ... then it was sold.
