Frage von Chris.:
I couch with the correct assertion that HDV on CRT monitors Qualiät achieved a better than PAL?
Antwort von Maik:
I couch with the correct assertion that HDV on CRT monitors Qualiät achieved a better than PAL? Nope, because you lying wrong.
PAL Television can only PAL.
What, however, like Diksutiert and widely accepted as correct is:!
An HDV - Recording, runterskaliert to PAL has a slightly sharper
Picture detail and richer than with standard PAL MiniDV recorded.
Comparison to BetaSP / DigiBeta looks again different.
So, the recording HDV downconvert followed with a 'hint'
more picture quality than standard DV.
Many greetings,
M.
Antwort von grovel:
I would relativise times that the monitor on the tube it matters.
Finally, there is now even HD-ready tube TV and PC each tube offers more than just PAL - on these monitors would be the quality in any case be higher than PAL.
In the normal television, not even the most even-FULL PAL may, however, is the noise and smoke.
SeeYa Groveler
Antwort von petepopcorn:
I couch with the correct assertion that HDV on CRT monitors Qualiät achieved a better than PAL?
Nope, because you lying wrong.
PAL Television can only PAL.
What, however, like Diksutiert and widely accepted as correct is:!
An HDV - Recording, runterskaliert to PAL has a slightly sharper
Picture detail and richer than with standard PAL MiniDV recorded.
Comparison to BetaSP / DigiBeta looks again different.
So, the recording HDV downconvert followed with a 'hint'
more picture quality than standard DV.
Many greetings,
M. you have some examples at hand,
So a direct comparison between:
-hvx100 miniDV / HDV a1/digiBeta-no xh preference / no preference-BetaSP
s.besten 5 sec unkompremiertes material of any source
under the same optimal conditions
(motiv / ausschnitt Außenaufnahme)?
only if we can compare the times,
one comes to a profound statement
otherwise I'll tell the HDV has the sharpest image
pal on a studio monitor (obs stimmt?).
gruß cj
Antwort von Maik:
you have some examples at hand,
So a direct comparison between:
-hvx100 miniDV / HDV a1/digiBeta-no xh preference / no preference-BetaSP
s.besten 5 sec unkompremiertes material of any source
under the same optimal conditions
(motiv / ausschnitt Außenaufnahme)?
only if we can compare the times,
one comes to a profound statement
otherwise I'll tell the HDV has the sharpest image
pal on a studio monitor (obs stimmt?).
gruß cj I know the Z1 and SonyFX1 and in direct comparison to
BetaSP (DXC D30 head and analog recorder part).
Apart from the fact that it is still a technical difference
(Farbsampling 4:2:0 and 4:2:2, for example), there is still a visual synonymous
Difference between beta and downconverted HDV to Beta.
Mag synonymous s.den HDV optics lie (if the are not interchangeable),
but it is quite visible yet. The subjective 'sharpest' PAL Picture has DigiBeta.
My two cents,
M.
Antwort von petepopcorn:
the keyword is "directly Comparison": a row sees you notice the difference "normal" DV and HDV (runterkonvertiert) is certainly much closer look at and perhaps synonymous difference DigiBeta - HDV runterkonvertiertes (side view anyway).
The only question is when to test, except perhaps something right after each other / side by side view? I maintain that the TV is normal consumers do not realize is that the broadcasters too much eh weggeregelt quality. With the standard DVD: ditto.
The quality that I now
own with HDV material on your Full HD TV can see, I will be at Premiere and Canal weißdergeierwelchem
never seen.
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
Pal Television can only Pal, NTSC, NTSC only
There are, however, the tube TV quite HDV play it. This is not the system but otherwise s.Pal possibility a tube device more than Resolutionwiederzugeben Pal. These devices usually have a YUV input from the HDV signal processing.
PS: I have a Pal tube projector, but synonymous Pal Pal Progressive HDV and can not do alone but a multiscan TV already.
