Frage von Kubus:
Hi,
das thema gabs been determined to accumulate but I ask the question again!
I have a panasonic nv gs 500 and closing via firewire to. software at the moment I use premiere 2.0. if I can render the finished film, I use standard settings ie 756x ... 25 FPS PAL.
the finished film has a rather moderate overall quality. I can capture the quality of the renderings and improved by video editing I use instead of the firewire port, what opportunities there are to increase quality?
thx for your reply!
Antwort von PowerMac:
No, does not capture the s.der quality. A video card that has no benefit. A digital signal can not be better than it is.
If anything, the rendering is what do I render, if I had DV (fortunately very rarely) directly in 10 bit and 4:2:2, quasi uncompressed (ProRes 4:2:2). These do I find more quality settings, such as optimal filtering and quality sowas (Final Cut Pro). Animations, Titling and Compositing look so much better than if they were rendered in DV.
Antwort von Stefan_:
True, the "capture" is the normal DV workflow actually in the sense no more, which makes the camera during the recording. Then the video digitally on tape before. It must therefore only be copied to the calculator will no longer be re-interpreted or scanned. Blöderweise say many of the process, even the video they would "Digitizer" and actually my only umkopieren. This is not real bad habit that has become common.
So if your unprocessed and especially not new compressed digital video (yes, DV is compressed synonymous) on the screen looks not so great, then did you or the camera is not as synonymous already taken toll.
Antwort von thos-berlin:
About Firewire in the videos yourself Calculator is absolutely OK.Eine other firewire card synonymous Picture may not be better to restore, because it is a pure act Dateitranfer.
Otherwise, it is when viewing the video s.PC always kammartigen "disturbances" s.senkrechten edges. The movements are especially at visible and pans. This is normal and is s.der presentation of videos (interlaced) on PC monitors (non-interlaced / progressive). These disorders are s.Television not see.
Was it this?
Antwort von beiti:
I have a panasonic nv gs 500 and closing via firewire to. [...] The finished film has a rather moderate overall quality. If you're using Firewire to restore and then back to DV tape zurückspielst, you should see a digital copy 1:1-which proves that no loss of quality.
I see several possibilities:
1) Your material is not particularly good (eg in bad light), but you did it until after the cut s.Television viewed and can not grasp it now. ;)
2) You judge the quality s.PC monitor, which of course is nonsense. You have to have the film back to DV and off with the camcorder on the television again, or at least to DVD and burn with the DVD player s.Television play.
3) You use incorrect rendering settings that affect the quality deteriorate. In the normal cut should only have a few points (screens, flashes, filtered scenes) are rendered. Simply cut a movie should be made without rendering the timeline can play.
4) You process the film is too strong (continuous video filters, etc.) so that the quality deteriorated.
5) You can divide the movie into MPEG2 encode and burn it straight to DVD, but have unfavorable attitudes erwischt encoder, such as low data rate.
For behind the problem to come, go have a look a standard workflow by playing a piece of computer hardware in Premiere's agreement to a game and then it directly of the timeline back to a (different) from the DV tape. If you're in the Comparison of the two tapes synonymous only the slightest notice the quality difference is in fact a problem.
