Frage von Riki1979:
Dear filmmakers,
on behalf of a friend who is a director, I've filmed one of her self-written, 100-minute play. At home I have provided the film with an on-and then a list of credits, the DVD burning and printing synonymous and designed the cover.
Now I have given her the DVD and said that she should give me so much is it worth it. But it is now that I you make a Best Offer!
Now, your suggestions are asked: How much would you because of such an employee, then if your A DVD created?
LG
Riki1979!
Antwort von mbwkrause:
Let's invite you to dinner and that was it. Because if you would provide a "real" account, it would certainly starting at 500 + X, provided you have worked professionally. And I bet as much as they wanted to spend but not ...
Antwort von edgar:
Eating out is a good option!
Applies here as before: Who makes clear agreements in advance, must not "rumeiern" afterwards.
Greeting E.
Antwort von Riki1979:
Eating out is a good option! Well yes, but they go to eat does not have time because she is very busy. And all too expensive for them it should not be synonymous! Also, I'm Hartz IV recipients and may therefore not synonymous to earn too much!
Antwort von Jott:
Counting your hours (complete, not forget anything, including discussions and so what) together and take the statutory minimum wage for cleaners as the base. This is the lower limit - if your work is worth more and more knowledge is limited as the correct handling of a vacuum cleaner, you have to assess themselves. And of course the usual daily rates for the equipment (Camera and Calculator Plus software was so synonymous not grow on trees).
If you do not pay for your girlfriend wants, she's not your girlfriend.
Antwort von NEEL:
You have the answer but where it yourself: The Hartz IV recipients You can still keep 100 ¬. So your account should not be higher, because that would somehow stupid. A friend who is synonymous to Hartz makes s.and Photoshop to work for me and also get for 100 ¬ of me if there are more, then is spread over several months.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
If the whole thing is run as a kind of complacency among friends and without agreement on prices, then let's give symbolic 50 to 70 euros and mentioning in passing that she had so tasted action as a commercial customer easily worth 1000 ¬. The right s.sich a per hour or daily rates here would probably result in amounts that are the basis for such an action Hobby neither justified nor friendly sustaining.
Antwort von soan:
Pfft ... then he can mention the so synonymous equal work loosely ¬ 8000 would have cost - that would be tantamount to cutting a few days "industry professional" out.
50-70 ¬ you are well advised. The "follow-on order" for your friends before an agreement should contain, then never stop 2x100 ¬ and have a decent wage. More should not be for a Freundschaftstat, I comment.
Comparison with the "would have cost if I totally would if the top professional" I would not be attempted - WORKS hardly embarrassing.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Neither is it embarrassing nor it is just a question of whether one or 8000 ¬ 1000 ¬ or otherwise call a fantasy value. Background is simply that we are dealing with such clients often times with to completely clueless, ask the face of a 50-euro bill still in disbelief: "How much? The tape costs ¬ but not more than five and a DVD to burn only a few cents? "Such resentment prevents you from s.besten when you notes, how much more the customer would have to pay for this service if he had commissioned a professional production company to . Then, the joy is great among friends about the good business.
But respect: If you manage your customer for a one-camera recording of a play to take 8,000 euros, then you're really good ;-)
Antwort von gunman:
Where can I binn for here ?????
A friend asks me if I would do it. Ok I say yes and do it, without directly at the "job" with her talking about any price. So my problem.
If you except your time and the DVD there was no cost, then I would question what it costs to synonymous answer, we may try to eat together. If she has no time for it for you ... then I would accept, of course, and still say it would be in order.
It would be the last time that I am this "friend" would have helped out of trouble.
Next time you will surely find a good excuse ...
Gunman
Antwort von Alf_300:
Leichhardt much you say that you only synonymous max 100 ¬ requirement shall not, therefore it will cost 1 ¬ plus the usual voluntary bonus under the table
because pay the VAT charged on any need
Antwort von edgar:
If you except your time and the DVD there was no cost, then I would question what it costs to synonymous answer, we may try to eat together. If she has no time for it for you ... then I would accept, of course, and still say it would be in order.
It would be the last time that I am this "friend" would have helped out of trouble.
Next time you will surely find a good excuse ...
Gunman If it is so with friends?
An honest word at the right time and in appropriate sound are sure kontruktiver than the roundabout way "Durchgeärschel.
Unfortunately in our society to go a good way to the path of least resistance ...
When I read something, then I ask myself more often:
"Where am I landed here ...!?"
Greeting E.
Antwort von Mink:
"Where am I landed here ...!?"
In a forum with more than 100 active (more or less mentally graduates) participants. Have fun! ;)
But anyway you are right!
And the problem: Just make it clear once again that it was a pleasure. If you then they will still be what it must look. A realistic price you can call in the fall so probably not so why talk about it yet?
Antwort von gunman:
"Where am I landed here ...!?"
In a forum with more than 100 active (more or less mentally graduates) participants. Have fun! ;)
But anyway you are right!
And the problem: Just make it clear once again that it was a pleasure. If you then they will still be what it must look. A realistic price you can call in the fall so probably not so why talk about it yet? Hi dear Mink
Edgar has not written, but GUNMAN
No offense
Antwort von Mink:
edgar OOCH!
