Frage von popaj:
Hello,
make the question of cutting since I still have no idea.
If you have a short film made (approx. 15-30min.) S.Filmmaterial how much you should have it later so that the cutting is not too much?
Or is it Anyway, stop then more work later? What could you recommend me?
Am grateful for every tip.
PS: Perhaps the question sounds a bit stupid, but I would be interested
whether there was a target there.
Antwort von BananaDragon:
That all depends s.wie gneua you plan. If you know exactly what you want and each setting meticulously plan with you to get relatively little material. If you and your team a little more space in the test want to leave, so you'll have more raw materials, some of the s.Ende will not use.
So it is with s.dir how much / how little material you have in the post-production go.
Greeting
Marco
Antwort von Axel:
This all depends on how s.sicher and b) as a perfectionist you are working and c) whether you have someone as Scriptboy / girl and have continuity.
If you are alone or only a second for the technology is there, you may want as much material to have choice. The workflow looks like this, that you each make a few settings, and then again, from different angles. Constructed here with the 20-30 times s.Rohmaterial.
A good way of working is parallel to the tape recording material on a laptop to capture. That should be a separate task for a crew member. The physical can be a "log" that he / she is the shooting schedule and supervises the gecaptureten Takes directly with clearer designation logs. By nature of the "dailies", the recordings in a controlled Drehpause immediately and with labels may be. Nachzudrehende settings fall into the eye-spot.
Advantages: experience of success and motivation for (probably mostly unpaid) contributors, more control, more direct connection to the editing.
The resulting raw material remains the same, but honestly tapes are so cheap that no weight should be. Necessarily
synonymous record on tape, because you very quickly accidentally clips of a hard drive can delete (or your laptop falls down).
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) If you have a short film made (approx. 15-30min.) S.Filmmaterial how much you should have it later so that the cutting is not too much? (...) One should have nothing at all. You need what you want for the film cinematically just need. It's that simple. The extremely different - depending on the operation.
Antwort von cesky:
Hello
s.WE did my first short film "rotated.
Have just under 3 hours 30 min. Material needed.
The film is ultimately 2,5-3 min.
However, all parties (a cameraman, an actor and two Tonmann) no experience.
Greeting fidgety
Antwort von HmGast:
... general, the greatest mistake is to s.Material to save money.
For a finished film of 15 minutes in length, which is a little anpsruchsvoll, I constructed with at least 1 hour recorded material, but I make an average of 5 hours required.
The main work is done then s.PC, ie cutting, insert sounds, music has been unsuccessful, comments speak. There are 6-8 hours away quickly.
Antwort von popaj:
Hi folks,
Thank you first.
So I will be music in my short film does not have.
Yes then I'll be happy to film and just watch.
I still do not know with which program I use the whole
then cut it? What have you started?
gruss popaj
Antwort von PowerMac:
Final Cut Pro.
Antwort von Axel:
I still do not know with which program I use the whole then cut it? What have you started? With a cine-film viewer and a splicer. Because of the expense ratio was the film: raw = 1:3. Good, that is over. Other hand, earned most of these short name rather than today.
There are of course free and cheap editing programs. Mostly with little opportunity or replete with terrible effects. An at first glance not so easy free program would
AVID Free DV, but only for DV. It is logical, after all the silly user interface of the "simple" Programs (WMM, iMovie, etc.) of the purest balm. Just started.
