Frage von horstinger:
Hello,
I am not satisfied with the quality of my uploaded videos on youtube or blip. I would like to have a DV AVI of 15 minutes in length, which I like to be in top-quality www, where no preference. Now I have a nearly 150MB large flv file made come of it, but the quality, I imagine, has not. I would like to have sowas:
Can I somehow get out, who have taken the settings for that? Or can someone tell me how I get down sowas?
Danke schon mal!
Antwort von actaion:
Wow, check out with divx, Xvid, and H.264 codec.
And so that filesize comes out of the 200-250MB. And (put this on Progressive, no fields for video platforms). Then good quality should be possible.
Antwort von horstinger:
I export the movie into a DV Avi Magix, then it is 3.5 GB in size. I then unpack the file into SUPER, select flv and put the dimensions. Should I save it directly from Magix as flv, and then use divx? You think that it brings the quality as in my example?
Antwort von PowerMac:
This can not walk at all, because the kayak video with very expensive cameras and equipment was included.
Antwort von actaion:
no, I would convert only once.
But I know magix not, and do not know, therefore, that export-format options you have there.
Can you out magix synonymous with H.264 or divx to spend?
If you use super, try setting the following times:
1. avi
2. Xvid
3. Mp3
- FFMpeg
- Size can / aspectratio as in the original.
- Bitrate 1584th
- For audio 128th
Then, your video should it come to about 175MB, and have very good quality.
The bit rate can you matu wish to adapt in order to influence the size of output. Even with 1200, the quali should still be good, and then you come out at about 150 MB.
PS: Of course, the quality can never be better than the original video.
And on Youtube is re-compressed again, if necessary, so again a bit more quality is lost.
Antwort von shodushitanaka:
This can not walk at all, because the kayak video with very expensive cameras and equipment was included. Amazing ... You can use the user name or topic number (;???) see how bad his equipment?
Cool. If it does not work with the filming, you simply go to Astro TV.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Yes, I can, as stated in the thread that it is a) to DV, which is b) also cut with Magix. Neither MAGIX has the reputation of being highly professional, yet it offers in its workflow and export opportunities, the same video quality as improved Programs.
Moreover, the Youtube video seen HD sources, even multiple cameras on cranes.
Antwort von LarsProgressiv:
Hello horst inger,
Take only every 2 row (and only one field), and halving the width of your computer, or doubles the amount of the representation relation.
This creates a progressive movies that can see better on computer monitors.
Then say, as I wrote actaion, the recommended codecs. Although I do not mp3 but would take Vorbis.
Regards
Lars
Antwort von PowerMac:
Intelligent deinterlacer are much better than a mere omission of Halbbildzeilen.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Hmm - I've ne HF100 - my video is to that look - how do I get the point :-(;
, - / ... genuine, clearly people come!
Powermac's absolutely right.
Lars says that the clip you could make bigger, the resolution of the synonymous still possible. (; In "" set)
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Anne Nerven:
That s.Equipment is not alone, but affect the settings when uploading quite the quality you see here:
So, let horst inger but erstmal the best quality can upload and tears followed by his film. The stupid, the! What asks simply synonymous here ...
Antwort von horstinger:
do not you think I should have given up: Thanks to your tips I'm working around here, thank you before, do I sound when I have a result .......
Antwort von pilskopf:
I recognize in the video no special quality.
I'll do so from Magix for my vids, but may be that the synonymous quite badly lot better, but I do not know the following:
MP4, 720p, bitrate 6000, AVC H.264
It looks like this example
File Size will be at 4 min approx 150mb or more. The same file then synonymous to Vimeo. http://www.vimeo.com/4514291
Antwort von DWUA:
@ "At the nerves";)
Upload tips have been given yet - is not it?
Do you expect precise answers to vague questions? No!
Inasmuch as all answers are correct!
... I would like to have sowas:
... can someone tell me how I get out sowas?
What now? Sure - it's not about 10 cameras s.10 locations
s.Kran one of them, a s.Seil - perhaps it is "only"
More diversity in
movement under
light conditions is not simple.
Why else chosen this example?
"How to ..."
PM, it hits the point: The first criterion now we call it
Image quality, and this is the business of "equipment".
Noise does stop masses s.Speicherkapazität,
what the upload program but it is completely not care.
;))
ps
Horst @ inger
+ + + just read your last post is still our + + +
+ + + more from'm going to concrete + + + + + + thank you
Antwort von domain:
What exactly please s.dem video should be so much better than other "HQ" videos on various providers?
No matter what is being delivered, but is everything anyway reformatted into an Internet-enabled format (;) in which, incidentally, sometimes as a question.
Apart from that it's not about the ultimate sharpness and one 4:4:4 color resolution, but a moving drama with strong content with picture-and even more Tonwirkung who commands the one who need to spend more than 10 seconds when Herumzappen.
And can sometimes synonymous to grow into a real movie experience.
Antwort von horstinger:
so now I'll have it done as actaion has said. A short test video see here:
http://blip.tv/file/2225874 That is certainly not bad, but the above example, video to which I said "That should be synonymous in my shows, in contrast (which no pixels, no noise s.den edges; time in my video you can see the trees at top left ) and is much sharper. In the original mine is synonymous so sharp, you think there is something that I could improve? The short video is 7.2 MB in size.
Edit: not true, I've done something else, because Super logs somehow IIMM error when in video and Aspect Ratio "NOCHANGE specify", so I chose 384x288.
Antwort von pilskopf:
The time is not at all. May I ask what resolution your video is that you want to upload? HD?
Antwort von horstinger:
I just edited above: 384x288. And there are already 7MB for 28sekunden.
Antwort von DWUA:
Once the camera with paddles, not once.
@ Domain
True, but you know THE?
Sit three playing skat.
Says one of them suddenly "Chess!"
The other replied: "Nonsense, there's still the Halma
no penalty! " ;)))
Antwort von horstinger:
I have in my video synonymous scenes s.denen the Cam mitpaddelt not, but look exactly like that.
I've now uploaded in 768x576 again, then it is 27MB, but for 1 / 2 minutes, that's too much for a 15min video, right?
http://blip.tv/file/2225991
Antwort von actaion:
- Double post --
Antwort von actaion:
[quote = "actaion"]
Edit: not true, I've done something else, because Super logs somehow IIMM error when in video and Aspect Ratio "NOCHANGE specify", so I chose 384x288. 384x288 is obviously synonymous far too low!
You should either keep the original resolution, 640x480 or set!
An Xvid 720x576 and bit rate in 1500 has for me is about 12.5 MB per minute.
Antwort von horstinger:
Perhaps you have the XVID Converter configured differently? He's got dozens of settings ....
Antwort von Anne Nerven:
@ DWUA
horst inger is with the quality when you upload not satisfied and called a couple of file data. Since you believe now, but not seriously, that he is "unhappy" because he has no Kranaufnahme above the torrent.
His concern was only for a few tips for the settings and not to find out why he will have
in life is not a good quality.
And verily I say: it is refreshing to find in his mailbox, the "slashcam-mail to which a link is faulty on your equipment manifests, rather than simply write to: Make an MP4 with 720P ... eg Pilskopf actaion or. (; Is this really the 2 "a" a clerical error in the application have been?)
Peace on earth
Dirk
Antwort von horstinger:
.. but only just converted: all of the settings as you've said, 720x576 xvid, 29sek = 27MB
Antwort von actaion:
eg Pilskopf actaion or. (; Is this really the 2 "a" a clerical error in the application have been?)
No, definitely not. Had to watch at school times should.
;-)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aktaion
Antwort von actaion:
.. but only just converted: all of the settings as you've said, 720x576 xvid, 29sek = 27MB hmm, funny, that's more than 4-fold as mine.
Good mine is 16:9, yours 4:3, and your video is very restless, which makes up what synonymous. But more than twice should not really come out to ...
add ma nen Scrennshot one of super, before You start the conversion. Maybe we discover there's a bug ...
Antwort von horstinger:
Did it just once with 640x480 and 1200bit tried (but at 16:9) then it is only 17MB.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Say, do you feel about the quality or the size of the file?
Antwort von horstinger:
actually only about the quality. But what happens when someone with a 2MB ADSL line at blip clicks on a movie that when you upload a few hundred MB big? The jerky is not unbearable or the poor have to wait forever, until the film is in the cache?
What then are the films in a very good quality?
Antwort von horstinger:
sooo, what do you think because at the current version?
http://signinforblip.blip.tv/file/2226221/ This is the 640x480, xvid, 2pass, 1200bit, but just in 16:9 (and although this is still only in the full screen look like?) 32MB per minute.
Better, right? Acceptable?
Now I'm only time in bed, thanks for the recent times have answers!
Antwort von pilskopf:
actually only about the quality. But what happens when someone with a 2MB ADSL line at blip clicks on a movie that when you upload a few hundred MB big? The jerky is not unbearable or the poor have to wait forever, until the film is in the cache?
What then are the films in a very good quality? Do not worry about the others. Downlaod is still incredibly fast, with each line ner 2000 Vid is quick enough there, what you do is for 56k users, you need to take that into consideration but I think times. But I must still ask, why do not you take Youtube, which give the opportunity in the best HD quality upload something. Standard resolution should be at least 720x576. It is better to 720p. Everything else is really nonsense, you wish that people look at your videos, give them quality. What is it for the expensive, beautiful Cams has s.end when not using their quality. 'And ne bitrate of 1200 is still kacke, 5000mind. 2000 course, is synonymous to 5000 but the differences are enormous. Do the download of others not to worry.
Antwort von domain:
The picture quality on my wound zehnachtziger monitor is still very modest, if the recordings are substantially synonymous pretty exciting. But even worse is the sound, that is typical amateurmäßig darübergeklatschte "Music".
Since you had to really even give you a lot more effort. The sound is more than 50% of the video and music stands out s.letzter body to reinforce the impression.
In my opinion, one would have to Noise and wheezing and canoeing, and water and hear etc..
About http://www.freesound.org/searchText.php
download, but wait a considerable work on many sound tracks and the mixer impressive to arrange everything.
Antwort von actaion:
why hast thou angekereuzt 5:4? If the original-video (in the format, and not 4:3)?
Top Quality and 48kk-audio, I had not checked with me.
Although I do not glaueb that makes the huge different.
Antwort von actaion:
sooo, what do you think because at the current version?
http://signinforblip.blip.tv/file/2226221/
This is the 640x480, xvid, 2pass, 1200bit, but just in 16:9 (and although this is still only in the full screen look like?) 32MB per minute.
Better, right? Acceptable? Slightly better than the previous one. Really good but not synonymous.
16:9 And there is nothing at all ... look at the synonymous not in full screen.
Antwort von actaion:
actually only about the quality. But what happens when someone with a 2MB ADSL line at blip clicks on a movie that when you upload a few hundred MB big? The jerky is not unbearable or the poor have to wait forever, until the film is in the cache?
What then are the films in a very good quality? So you need not worry you. The film will be of those who no preference whether Blip, or DuRöhre vimeo, before re-encoded and compressed. So much so that he eats little storage space.
In DuRöhre you can look at the film and even more in two grades, because the user can then decide its upper management and / or HD-HQ is fit (and the 2 versions are automatically created).
That is why I would, if it is not a problem for you to upload the clip still in high quality. So keep the original resolution. Xvid bit rate 1500 or even 2400th
Antwort von DWUA:
... So you have to worry you ... You're right!
In some areas, however, where the Tälecom
With just 384 - 403 kbps
DSL download speed "providet", which is already annoying for the people, if they
must runterruckeln for 1 minutes film 10 minutes.
On the same flat rate price. (; Insolence Change: to "cable"!)
But here are synonymous huge differences among the servers.
@ Domain
For you in reference to your concerns regarding
"Atmo + recordings" something out of the retort:
NOT HERE! Please show times into the
Forum Offtopic. Keyword: "Listen."
Antwort von B.DeKid:
..... (; Insolence Change: to "cable"!)
...... Gibts unfortunately not ;-( synonymous, but you right, I always say it synonymous with the Big Pink was supposed to pay for power .... of course even if I then ner 1000 with only 10 euros less wide than my guys in NRW for NE 32 He then led me hmm some 20 euros by 32 times .... and lo and behold - I'd say this would be times you can then transmit a fair price.
But because Bauer Schmidt and Bauer Jupp as well do with, precisely because the only just have exchanged the sliding board against the calculator, it will probably nix, - /
We have hard hats em here on the land, progress or nature that is the question ... na dann mal I'm milking the cows. Oh yes, the milk agrees machts synonymous possible more.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von horstinger:
But I must still ask, why do not you take Youtube, which give the opportunity in the best HD quality upload something. Youtube cuts me like so many, always the music, because of the rights. Blip is there more relaxed.
I was just a little test with youtube. Can it be that blip runtersetzt subsequently the quality? Last night was my last test video better before .......
Antwort von pilskopf:
But I must still ask, why do not you take Youtube, which give the opportunity in the best HD quality upload something.
Youtube cuts me like so many, always the music, because of the rights. Blip is there more relaxed.
I was just a little test with youtube. Can it be that blip runtersetzt subsequently the quality? Last night was my last test video better before ....... Ok, would you still Vimeo for HD.
Antwort von horstinger:
Top Quality and 48kk-audio, I had not checked with me.
Although I do not glaueb that makes the huge different. BUT!! The two hooks I've deleted, and now I'm at Dateiggröße like you!
I can of course again --- let's try something new ......
Antwort von horstinger:
Ok, would you still Vimeo for HD. Can it? Better typifies quality as a blip?
I read somewhere that blip in quality would be the best choice, because it was not as strong komrimieren - that will probably a misinformation. Then I try with views Vimeo ...............
Antwort von pilskopf:
In vimeo you can upload in 720p, 1 time per week, always of Saturday to Saturday I think. This is true for HD, otherwise you can upload 500mb a week, quality is pretty good in HD but there absolutely top and the best thing you'll find on the net as a free hosting service. Toward monetary limit where you can upload HD videos.
Antwort von horstinger:
just seen: when you can blip rather than the flash-file synonymous to the original avi file uploaded on veoh link .... and videos about 1GB host-only info, I do not know whether I still weiterhilft ;-)) )
