Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hudson hack for Canon EOS 5D Mark II of thomas - 18 May 2009 13:57:00 Anonymous writes: "The countdown is on cinema5D.com has a hacker named Hudson s.The work done to prepare a firmware hack for Canon EOS 5d MarkII. The first step is to him according to their own information and as synonymous the screenshot you can see, managed to coax the automatic audio gain to hacker and his initials, expand the menu. Nett: Hudson s.Hack working in his spare time, which is written in the C programming language. Whether he all targets of canonhack.com can be achieved, however, he leaves. "
This is an auto-generated entry
This is news to report with pictures and link to the pages slashCAM Magazine
Antwort von pailes:
... Nice: Hudson s.Hack working in his spare time ... Is that surprising in any way and manner? Full-time one will hardly make sowas.
Hey who is sponsoring me a 5D MKII? My free time then maybe I'll spend so synonymous with the firmware hack ";)
Antwort von NEEL:
Full-time one will hardly make sowas Why not? Who designed this a highly sought-after firmware can currently make a lot of money with it. And exposure for a small time theater synonymous'd programmed.
My free time then maybe I'll spend so synonymous with the firmware hack " Lend you but one, unless you can do it. If you manage to hack, you are the entries in the technology history secure. No excuses gibts ... :)
Antwort von pailes:
Why not? Because it is legally in a gray area? A custom firmware can not contain any schonmal original Code of Canon, as they hold a copyright on it. If there is a patch and aushebelt these security mechanisms, then the whole IMO is illegal.
Antwort von deti:
Why not?
Because it is legally in a gray area? A custom firmware can not contain any schonmal original Code of Canon, as they hold a copyright on it. If there is a patch and aushebelt these security mechanisms, then the whole IMO is illegal. That would stop it but none of them do anyway, right? The legal issues are of secondary importance but in the end, if there is a principled solution. What is possible is made - as far as I have learned of the people who make Mac OS X on standard PCs running.
Deti
Antwort von Zizi:
I have learned so many of the people who make Mac OS X on standard PCs running. That is no longer a problem these days eh!
Da gibts enough soft / hardware to make it easy for ..
However, a Mark2 is to hook a completely different topic!
Antwort von NEEL:
However, a Mark2 is to hook a completely different topic! I can see exactly the same way. I think many try hacking the firmware and only a few will succeed. This hacker gains IMHO rightly received much attention simply because he has found an access code and a way.
Even if the whole thing would be legally a gray area: The sale of a hacked firmware over the Internet with a. To Domain is surely no problem. If 10,000 users to pay $ 50 each, that would be a lot of effort. (; Unfortunately I can not hack, otherwise smooth ichs'd try ...:)
Antwort von pailes:
That would stop it but none of them do anyway, right? The legal issues are of secondary importance but in the end, if there is a principled solution. What is possible is made - as far as I have learned of the people who make Mac OS X on standard PCs running. It was not about the feasibility, but to sell about a custom firmware and make it a pile of coal.
I have no doubt that it is possible to modify the firmware accordingly, but the Comparison with OS X on Intel hardware is lagging a bit. We are talking here not about the 5D Firmware Compact Take a photo on my walk to get to.
