Frage von Videoler:
Good day everybody!
Have with a HDC-SD1 made some shots. The quality is good, but unlike my DV recordings because the movements are simply not as fluid. This is both directly s.LCD as synonymous after exporting to a DVD. I took the same, that this could s.den frames. Well I thought since you somewhere between p and i could switch, but I think the niergends. Am I too stupid? Have always the best mode (HF) is selected.
Can this camera even with record fields? So 1080i50 would indeed be the right ...
Bin for your Hife very grateful!
Antwort von Daigoro:
The information requested of you are on Page 66, 79 bottom left and 124 of the manual.
Antwort von Videoler:
Thanks for the answer!
OK, there is that the recording format is 1080i50. That would be good. But why is the play not as fluid as I know of her computer?
And why I do not see any "fence Latte Effect" when I use the images as QuickTime Player, as it does with DV is the case?
Thanks for the help!
Antwort von Daigoro:
Perhaps there is indeed someone who has solved a similar problem and has something to say, if not, you need to find a solution themselves.
Once thought, according to
- (I think it was page 79 in the instructions), or if you have to put your automatic Television went on the * output * to progressively asked.
Other options:
- Low shutter / shutter (on about 1 / 150 movements are no longer liquid) - look at whether the automatic runs, whether the set down to 1 / 50 what does' sport 'automatic program avoided.
- "Rolling shutter"?
- General problems of the highly compressed Camera Video synonymous liquid again play / decode?
- SD card does not have enough memory bandwidth?
- Your Television (TFT? Plasma?) Has 60 Hz, the camera is from 50i - Television ie, the two different values? -> Instructions on the TV show.
And why I do not see any "fence Latte Effect" when I use the images as QuickTime Player, as it does with DV is the case? 1. is high, the 'combs' are so much smaller than DV?
2. QuickTime comes with the better de-interlacing of the codec as with the DV-Avi of clear?
If you want to make better videos, I recommend in any case an accurate study of the manuals - both the Camera of Ausgabegeraets as synonymous with the settings and even a little rum to experiment.
That you find someone that you just described of the problem and has solved synonymous, if you are lucky, though, but then sometime the next problem.
Antwort von Videoler:
Hey thanks for your detailed reply! Will probably clean all times to check ...
And why I do not see any "fence Latte Effect" when I use the images as QuickTime Player, as it does with DV is the case?
1. is high, the 'combs' are so much smaller than DV?
2. QuickTime comes with the better de-interlacing of the codec as with the DV-Avi of clear? So I've just converted the MPEG2 (DVD), so PAL 720x576, viewed in QT Player, and with this' MPEGstreamclip 'evolved into a computer. Of course without deinterlace! If you check the QT player in the movie properties in quality to 'High Quality' puts (Single Field and deinterlacing of course may not be angehägelt!), Half are shown. What recordings s.der DV Camera clearly be seen (Combs)! During the recording of the SD-1, however, no trace of them! That irritates me, the whole so as synonymous!
Would be nice if someone could confirm that he's AVCHD camera with a clean interlace-how!
Antwort von andi62:
Would be nice if someone could confirm that he's AVCHD camera with a clean interlace-how! If you ever aware of what nonsense you there at all telling?
Antwort von Daigoro:
Would be nice if someone could confirm that he's AVCHD camera with a clean interlace-how!
If you ever aware of what nonsense you there at all telling? Since you do not aufklaerst, he will probably never know ... (I can with the evidence so nix start .. interlace? deinterlace? clean?'s synonymous in the dirty?)
Antwort von Videoler:
Apologies people, if I have expressed myself unclear.
Then I put my last question again differently:
Can anyone confirm that he had with his AVCHD Camera (s.liebsten even SD1) equal liquid hinbekommen recordings, as they know of DV? Fact remains that my movements are not redundant (no preference on which the display) and when I look at the pictures (in the same way as DV material) "take apart", I did not skip (Combs, Latte Effect fence) can recognize ( Field 1 and 2 are identical in time) and therefore it is my presumption that it is precisely with progressive material and this is the reason for the slightly "jerky" playback represents!
Now everything clear what I am saying?
