Infoseite // Incorrect CPU utilization AE.CS4

Frage von ChrisCore:

Hi,

I was finally on a system upgraded Quad (Q6600), but After Effects uses quite defiantly only up to max. 40%. Gridiron I am familiar with, but this does not yet exist for CS4.

Is there any way or a setting in After Effects, the better CPU utilization enables " The "multi-processor system in AE seems only to refer to the workflow, but not on the rendering speed, right?

Can not be true that there is much potential for broke and it cost time and money!

The SuFu I have already used other synonymous, but without a good answer. Google hits there somehow synonymous only with CS3, and always will be noted on Gridiron.

Thanks for any tip.

edit: Windows XP, 2GB RAM

Antwort von B.DeKid:

Gude

Is not that good that it only uses 40%?

Or have you now expects everything goes faster than before?

Furthermore, the PC utilization synonymous with the FX used together.

I can not understand what synonymous since then time and / or how the time effect on money?
You need to render every day - I can render things while I sleep - and it will take longer I can sleep longer synonymous ;-)

MfG

B. DeKid

Antwort von Mylenium:

"Chris Core" wrote: Can not be true that there is much potential for broke and it cost time and money!

Then working with comps but that the system utilize? Such discussions are -> exponential sense <--. Most effects are far less computationally intensive, and that the CPU all the time now would glow. If you are not 500 Blur stack on top of each other, is not the synonymous change, the less, because most effects are only mediocre multithreaded, so of your 4 cores, on average, only 2 use. Then there is the rendering order for pre-comps and the sequence of effects and even schwupps already haste the salad. I do not say yes, that is fine, but somewhere it is logical. Whether and how the times change, and speculation is whether the Nucleo Pro miracle weapon is synonymous not yet out. It does ultimately synonymous nix differently, as additional instances of domestic AE sandbox to run and if you do not pre-comps, or no value to Spec Previews sets, it has only limited usefulness synonymous.

Mylenium

Antwort von ChrisCore:

Well, that with the "over night rendering is so ne thing at night for what the customer needs and rausschicken you busy until the afternoon.

It is not even that I have any use Effects exponentially, but it's not too much to ask if I want that my 4 processor cores as efficiently as possible the computing tasks to solve, which makes them AE.

The fact that rendering speed on Money and impact that a relationship between time and money there, you will surely not seriously doubt, right? At least not if you used AE and professionally so that money earned.

Quote:
Is not that good that it only uses 40%?

Or have you now expects everything goes faster than before?
No, it's definitely not good that only 40% of theoretically 100% (minus OS resources) will be used. This is really trivial. And yes, I had expected that it goes faster - and it does synonymous, but not porportional like to thank my 3D renderings from Cinema4d, where the CPU number and speed of nearly 1:1 with rendering speed scaled.

Is it really too much to ask if I want that AE similarly effective? Or did you just happy to, something that Adobe has optimized not enough?

Quote: Then working with comps but that the system utilize? Such discussions are -> exponential sense <--. Should be called? Is this a hint that I do not understand and my eyes open? In addition, no discussion, I wanted to start, but have asked for help and clarification!

Antwort von Bruno Peter:

About your Q6600 beats times of 4x2, 4 to 4x3, 0 GHz.

With CS3 rendering (according to MPEG2-HD) is the time for a 1hr video around 18 minutes using my OC shortened.