Frage von sonja Berg:
In this sense, Hello!
My name is Sonja and I will take you to the next 5 to 8 minutes something entertain / annoy / synonymous as always ....
I am working with DV editing already about 2 years (buuuah so vieeel really now - some say) in the amateur course ^ ^. Have some experience with professional video editing programs (yes - girls are not so stupid;)) (Premiere CS3, Sony Vegas, Avid Liquid).
Habe mir synonymous, in my opinion, was purchased NEN good camcorder (Panasonic NV-GS200) (which was expensive thing - that I had laaange babysitting;)).
Now I have accumulated a lot and wants to go professional warehouse. Hab mich erstmal in media market advice - I will never! do so again - not knowing what your camcorder is n!
Well, so I sat down in various forums durchgekämpft and searched for answers - but mostly in vain.
Therefore now the question:;))
I have before me a professional camera to buy (about 2000 - 3000 ¬ zb so SonyDCR-VX2100) (yes, I am now richtich become arid since I am now since about 4 months of cracking and eating yogurt to the Money for the Camera zusammenzukratzen;).
In this whole Wirrwar of information, I do not know what's good for me. should be with such a camcorder or 1080i or 1080p is better because of 720p already buy? and what has that whole i and p with the transfer of the camera to the hard drive to do?
Is the quality worse in a 1080i? Wars I tes-interlace footage that I never again can be set as a progressive?
What are looking for 60 frames in PAL?
And why are not more pixel wichtich ??????
I got in my good old cam. about 2.4 MP. For descriptions of new camcorder (> So for example my favorit: SonyDCR-VX2100) of which only 450,000 pixl Effective Image Sensor and 0.3 MP!
http://www.preissuchmaschine.de/psm_frontend/main.asp?produkt=321300
Huh? Perhaps it is because I'm blonde .... but I do not check ...
because someone has ne hair remedy?
Antwort von Markus:
... wants to go professional warehouse. Hab mich erstmal in Media Markt advice ... Professional technology get in Systemausstattern, not in consumer Blöd markets. But even with questions / purchase intentions for the consumer class would not go there. ;-)
Your questions are a bit confusing and not properly targeted. The VX2100 is the (consumer) what the ultimate reliability of the automatics and the weak light reserves are concerned. It is however not a camcorder for high-resolution video recordings, such as 720 or 1080 i or p.
Antwort von sonja Berg:
... wants to go professional warehouse. Hab mich erstmal in Media Markt advice ...
Professional technology get in Systemausstattern, not in consumer Blöd markets. But even with questions / purchase intentions for the consumer class would not go there. ;-)
Your questions are a bit confusing and not properly targeted. The VX2100 is the (consumer) what the ultimate reliability of the automatics and the weak light reserves are concerned. It is however not a camcorder for high-resolution video recordings, such as 720 or 1080 i or p. aha, well .... I understand ..... I think .... * * grübel grübel .... ähh. reserves and weak light automatics .... ähh. may nix so it ....
so I am still blonde ...
Antwort von C.I.W:
2.4 Mp are in PAL no preference. Even rhymes. To my knowledge, zeichet a PAL Camera 450,000 pixels. But why do you want to be a SD Sonycam? You can get for 2500 ¬ have ne FX7 ... And even for 3000 ne ¬ XHA1. I still prefer to wait with the camera purchase. Perhaps coming soon a successor in the 3000 ¬ class. If times really matured this year.
Antwort von Markus:
... ähh. reserves and weak light automatics .... ähh. nothing can make a start ... Weak light Reserve: The camcorder makes synonymous in adverse lighting conditions still good pictures (good = well recognizable and colorful picture content, low noise).
Automatic: Image sharpness, aperture and white balance are set to auto so that the picture balanced and neutral color will appear (ie, not too bright, too dark, or color).
Antwort von sonja Berg:
aha, ok, I have become somewhat dark blond ^ ^
and what is with the quality of a 1080i? "Wars I tes-interlace footage that I never again can be set as a progressive?"
the other Quälfragen I will spare you;))
Antwort von Alex12345:
the other Quälfragen I will spare you;)) och no, which you can make us calm. the interest people have with the matter to employ, and not just say things like: I want a Hollywood movie, where's the switch for this - where we are synonymous, but with more cynical comments ;)...
have you ever considered that with you as near to an open channel to go and then something with you?
Antwort von sonja Berg:
the other Quälfragen I will spare you;))
och no, which you can make us calm. the interest people have with the matter to employ, and not just say things like: I want a Hollywood movie, where's the switch for this - where we are synonymous, but with more cynical comments ;)...
have you ever considered that with you as near to an open channel to go and then something with you? nö not yet, so I will not blamieren ^^-... I am a perfectionist - must first of all before I know somewhere to go nem sender;)
Antwort von Markus:
and what is with the quality of a 1080i? "Wars I tes-interlace footage that I never again can be set as a progressive?" You can deinterlace interlaced video, so the delayed half frames to calculate. The cost, depending on the deinterlacer of course some time, but quality is now very possible.
Depending on the image output is the deinterlaces times absolutely necessary (eg for web applications) or superfluous (eg, video output s.einem plasma TV, which in turn can make deinterlaces).
I am a perfectionist ... * hehe * We have something in common. ;-)
Antwort von sonja Berg:
and what is with the quality of a 1080i? "Wars I tes-interlace footage that I never again can be set as a progressive?"
You can deinterlace interlaced video, so the delayed half frames to calculate. The cost, depending on the deinterlacer of course some time, but quality is now very possible.
Depending on the image output is the deinterlaces times absolutely necessary (eg for web applications) or superfluous (eg, video output s.einem plasma TV, which in turn can make deinterlaces).
I am a perfectionist ...
* hehe * We have something in common. ;-) ACHA - if I understand you so it is no preference: when 1080i has only one ne more resolution. ritich? ^ ^
Antwort von Markus:
Calculated with 1080i you get a higher Resolutionals with 720p, but there was some time ago have a nice test, which showed that the difference of most people by far not the extent is perceived (in many cases is not at all) as the numbers were suspect.
A resolution difference between 1080i and p does not exist. Only in one case that delay-half and in the other frames are stored. At the optimum (1080/50p), I still wait, because that would have both the high Resolutionvon the 1080, as synonymous motion playback of 50 frames per second.
Antwort von Alex12345:
Calculated with 1080i you get a higher Resolutionals with 720p, but there was some time ago have a nice test, which showed that the difference of most people by far not the extent is perceived (in many cases is not at all) as the numbers were suspect.
A resolution difference between 1080i and p does not exist. Only in one case that delay-half and in the other frames are stored. At the optimum (1080/50p), I still wait, because that would have both the high Resolutionvon the 1080, as synonymous motion playback of 50 frames per second. like 50? I thought there are 23.97 each or 24.97 or 29.97 ..... and then 60 fields for NTSC ... where now the 50 frames per second ago ... 8 - /
I think I am going gray .....^^
Antwort von JUB:
Why ne SD Cam for as much money to spend, if that's possible HD?
JUB
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... wants to go professional warehouse ... This is an area next: It would be much easier to watch a match Camera advisable if you would say something more precise, what you plan: wedding videos? Image Film for businesses? Short Films as a first step to Hollywood? Or something else? And how / where they should be shown: the Internet? DVD? Movies?
The VX2100 is a great camera in its class, it is only just - as Mark said yes - not high resolution. As necessary, however HD pictures for you at all, would be synonymous advance remains to be clarified ...
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von sonja Berg:
... wants to go professional warehouse ...
This is an area next: It would be much easier to watch a match Camera advisable if you would say something more precise, what you plan: wedding videos? Image Film for businesses? Short Films as a first step to Hollywood? Or something else? And how / where they should be shown: the Internet? DVD? Movies?
The VX2100 is a great camera in its class, it is only just - as Mark said yes - not high resolution. As necessary, however HD pictures for you at all, would be synonymous advance remains to be clarified ...
Gruß Bernd E. well, the camera was actually recommended to me ... person who has not given much thought about whether they should be high resolution or not. I would still have high-resolution camera for commercials, instructional videos and possibly movie trailer (who knows maybe werd ich super successful ^ ^). With my old Camera NV-GS200 MiniDV Although I do have 2.4 MP but it is not enough for me, because after I render synonymous with the highest possible setting mE only get mediocre material ...
Antwort von C.I.W:
You have me still not understood. You can get even with a 10MP PAL Camera Picture not with a higher resolution. No matter what because it is a PAL camera will no longer record than 450,000 pixels.
That makes the company only as Anlockmethode, just like the digital zoom.
Unless you want pictures with the camera, but that makes a man with half a perfectionist ambitions do not.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Sonya
Your questions are really in earnest?
On the one Page you will see the difference between Photo, PAL and HD not, but after questioning formats in 23.97 or 24.97 or 29.97 and say, You should have experience in Premiere CS3, Sony Vegas, Avid Liquid?
Antwort von Alex12345:
You have me still not understood. You can get even with a 10MP PAL Camera Picture not with a higher resolution. No matter what because it is a PAL camera will no longer record than 450,000 pixels.
That makes the company only as Anlockmethode, just like the digital zoom.
Unless you want pictures with the camera, but that makes a man with half a perfectionist ambitions do not. oki Dokie - what suggestions you have before
Antwort von WoWu:
Well if you do have the necessary experience in the different systems has cut, they should contact us first say what they already know ... and the rest will be safe here.
Antwort von C.I.W:
I propose: SonyHDR FX7, or do as I wait and see what this year so everything rauskommt in the 3000 ¬ price range.
Antwort von sonja Berg:
I propose: SonyHDR FX7, or do as I wait and see what this year so everything rauskommt in the 3000 ¬ price range. merci;) werd mich mal after the first scout.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Exactly CIW has since legally ....
He mentioned synonymous already SonyFX 7 or the Canon XHA1
Both models empfeheln
Kuck mal du http://www.geizhals.at/de
Whether Sony or Canon that's how Canon vs. Nikon So no preference.
Otherwise still times here in the forum under the heading "Comparison camcorder" look, which helps with the hair color ;-)
In Still Image functions so the MPs can safely be dispensed with.
What is important is solely and exclusively for the start times for example. the diameter of the lens and the light sensitivity.
Even the genre that you want to record preferred, and what other "toys" you want to use.
Conclusion FX7 vs. XHA1 are the models you should erhungern ;-)
Alla what I wish
Greets
B. DeKid
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Camera was actually recommended to me ... person who has not given much thought about ... ... with my NV-GS200 ... Although I do have 2.4 MP but it's enough for me not because ... I only get mediocre material ... If someone who does not worry that someone recommends including a camera who does not know, then the inevitable confusion of course ;-) The VX2100 would you despite their few pixels deliver a better picture than the GS200, but if you have HD want, it falls off naturally. Then the Canon XH-A1 well as the overall package is the best choice - however, requires the meaningful dealing with such a device has a great degree s.Kenntnis.
At your place I would purchase something else but put off and just everything about this camera s.Informationen class in me absorb what I can get. With this knowledge you will find it easier synonymous to decide what is important to you and what your future can be Camera. And do not forget that with the camera alone is not enough: a sturdy tripod and a decent Microphone are the absolute minimum s.Zusatzausstattung.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von sonja Berg:
... Camera was actually recommended to me ... person who has not given much thought about ... ... with my NV-GS200 ... Although I do have 2.4 MP but it's enough for me not because ... I only get mediocre material ...
If someone who does not worry that someone recommends including a camera who does not know, then the inevitable confusion of course ;-) The VX2100 would you despite their few pixels deliver a better picture than the GS200, but if you have HD want, it falls off naturally. Then the Canon XH-A1 well as the overall package is the best choice - however, requires the meaningful dealing with such a device has a great degree s.Kenntnis.
At your place I would purchase something else but put off and just everything about this camera s.Informationen class in me absorb what I can get. With this knowledge you will find it easier synonymous to decide what is important to you and what your future can be Camera. And do not forget that with the camera alone is not enough: a sturdy tripod and a decent Microphone are the absolute minimum s.Zusatzausstattung.
Gruß Bernd E. yes that's obvious to me: for tripod and microlocal I have about 600 - 800 ¬ planned
Antwort von C.I.W:
As you are still more of a beginner you are, I would rather synonymous to advise FX7, since with this camera is easier to make good pictures. The Canon offers because so many options.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Sonja Gude, kuck times,
Yesterday I had the admin or in another forum the same problem. with a user there, with a preference for complete citations had regarding ;-)... the use of your "Quotes", a small tip you would like to submit in advance taken note, then delete after [quote = "username"] of the text is not relevant and replace him as. by "...." then let stand the portion of the relevant ..... and with [/ quote] Close it remains clear ;-)
But now to the relevant part ......;-)
.........
for tripod and microlocal I have about 600 - 800 ¬ planned This is already well-planned, so you should not lie upside. Have you already given classified angekuckt? Manfrotto, Sennheiser, Rhode etc? This could be in deciding which camera is to be decisively contribute. Mics can be synonymous quite well on Ebay auction that is Tripod's head or perhaps even synonymous. Tell me what to do so.
Antwort von tsaG:
I recommend
keep your camera, have fun with it and try out a lot, if it goes to the right turn lend you one. and sometime weisste the Camera to suit you.
Antwort von DeeZiD:
CIW quote: "No matter what because it is a PAL camera is no more than 450,000 pixels to record."
And with a Panasonic HD Camera "is not more than 530000!
xD
Could not do otherwise.
Gruß Dennis
Antwort von Dagmar:
Strangely, even for HDV result in the recording 1,555,200 pixels. And that's not even full HD.
Antwort von WoWu:
And with a Panasonic HD Camera "is not more than 530000! ??????
Strangely, even for HDV result in the recording 1,555,200 pixels. Some cameras synonymous, but only after the first interpolation.
The second will follow after 1920 even more.
HDV is not 1440x1080 native auto and sometimes not even with Pixel Shift achieved.
Antwort von Dagmar:
Here was the
recording of the speech, and not how this is achieved.
Antwort von Dagmar:
That same but also .... only the 1,555,200 in some cameras do not even really true, so do not actually vote.
You kasst theoretically synonymous from a 1920 pixels interpolated and then the record ...
Antwort von Dagmar:
It actually seems to give people who do not want to or can understand that a football field of 1920x1080 m just 1920x1080 meters. No matter what the football field is situated.
Antwort von marcvulkan:
Quite aside from that of the comparison limps, he agrees not synonymous, because, for example, the new JVC in 1440 while recording, s.Output but 1920 makes available ... So your pitch has somewhere around 2 / 3 of the game is a mirror. But some believe is still a soccer field is 1920 times 1080, just because it looks and because it was always so. If we let it.
Antwort von marcvulkan:
Precisely - there may be a mirror in the field, but the field is holding a certain size, which is augezeichnet. And only this has been said.
But is seems terribly difficult to understand - as a simple statement.
