Frage von m00n:
Hi,
I have a tape (Hi8) with 100 minutes duration.
On my harddrive I have 20Gb free.
Since I Resolutioncapturen in DVD (want 720 * x) it is as AVI too big.
Is there a way aufzunehemen directly as MPEG? So that I can then burn the MPEG to DVD?
I'm really s.verzweifeln. Especially since I want to buy me a new hard drive.
Help a beginner! ;)
Many thanks, greetings.
Antwort von MiXMaster:
thou hast nen d8 camcorder to digitize?
Antwort von m00n:
Have a SonyHandycam DCR-TRV480 Digital8 camcorder with Firewire cables.
:)
Antwort von Markus:
Hello,
There are some devices (mainly in two ways cheap USB video grabber) that can capture directly to MPEG2. The MPEG quality is equal to the purchase price. ;-)
Then there is again very high NLE editing cards that can capture in MPEG2, but for 600 ¬ I would buy a DVD recorder s.Deiner body and save the remaining Hunnis. ;-)
Okay, now time to business: Video recordings bring a calculator means having to have a place. And with your camcorder is easy to capture a DV-AVI (with 13 GB / hr.). If the capacity of your hard drive is not enough and you want to buy any extra hard drive, which can be left?
If you are not on the quality, then take a USB video grabber (uaaahhh!) Or you borrow an external hard drive with a colleague, friend or acquaintance. ;-)
PS: USB grabber only of a few video editing programs support. ;-)
Antwort von Gast:
Transfer (= capture) about 30-40 minutes of your Hi8 video to your hard drive. Transcoder (encoder =) the *. avi to *. mpg and then delete the *. avi. Transfer the next 30-40 minutes and the transcoder, etc.
Then you have together three *. mpg, the "glue" (= merge) you then to one.
The transcoder and Mergen's example with TMPEGEnc. If you test the program have not already, you can download it when you are using Pegasys and 2 weeks for free (=). If necessary: This and other forums are full of guidance and assistance only way for the transcoder with TMPGEnc. The "patching" of *. mpg videos with TMPG goes on File, ... MPEG Tools, Merge & Cut.
Do not make the * avi-cuts too large (not greater than 40 min), TMPG need for temporary files to the transcoder still some s.Platz.
Antwort von m00n:
Thanks for your tips.
I have heard with Pinnacle you can record directly to MPEG.
What do you think? If you heirbei quality loss? Or did he take less in order to convert AVI to un it immediately?
Antwort von Voltz:
Yes, with Pinnacle Studio you can record directly to MPEG.
Some people swear by them, others have no other choice. I personally do not touch them and work to the end rather with the original DV AVI material. Additional (external) hard disks cost so synonymous not the world.
Antwort von m00n:
But if you do it to an external disk but it takes longer because they are pretty slow via USB? 100kb/sec, Firewire, however 400th
One has the great disadvantage if one starts directly to MPEG?
Antwort von MiXMaster:
I think when you cam of the archive only what you want on the dvd (yes to mpeg-2 based), I find it is the best, because no transformation more ;-)
Antwort von Flo1:
But if you do it to an external disk but it takes longer because they are pretty slow via USB? 100kb/sec, Firewire, however 400th
One has the great disadvantage if one starts directly to MPEG? So I do not know how it is with USB 1.1, but USB 2.0 (480 Mbps) is faster than Firewire 400 (400 Mbit).
Except Fire wire 800 with 800 Mbps is faster. Except Gigabyte Lan is faster 1000 Mb.
But come anyway festplatten not after.
Antwort von Joe Cool:
But if you do it to an external disk but it takes longer because they are pretty slow via USB? 100kb/sec, Firewire, however 400th
One has the great disadvantage if one starts directly to MPEG?
So I do not know how it is with USB 1.1, but USB 2.0 (480 Mbps) is faster than Firewire 400 (400 Mbit).
Except Fire wire 800 with 800 Mbps is faster. Except Gigabyte Lan is faster 1000 Mb.
But come anyway festplatten not after. But these are all just theoretical achievements, which are never reached, synonymous, of course, if everything is pointing ...
Antwort von Voltz:
I read my DV tapes regularly on my external FP.
To this end, I use Firewire 400
USB 2.0 also goes synonymous if the data stream may not be constant (depending on whether other consumers s.selben port are connected). From the experience reports of other users to me is certainly synonymous with regard to USB 2.0 noticed absolutely nothing negative.
Antwort von philema:
Hello? Why cry for here on None? Gehts noch? 100kb / s? This is DSL speed!
So USB 2.0 is 60 MB / s. Learn more about this on Wikipedia.
Direct record into MPEG I actually always do when I know exactly what I want to burn the videos to DVD later anyway.
I do it using Magix VdL 2005 plus. This should work fine, interlaced at the same time and provides optimum quality for me.
In addition, the MPEG file must then be no longer encoded on DVD.
Antwort von Joe Cool:
Well USB has a theoretical speed of about 12 Mbit / sec = 1.5 Mbytes / s and not 100 kb / s, which is determined by the software and the very much lower overhead, so it went, and indeed whether or not 100 or 1000 kb / sec.
Antwort von Markus:
... USB 2.0 (480 Mbps) is faster than Firewire 400 (400 Mbit). This must be differentiated: The data rate of high-speed USB is a
maximum of 480 Mbit / s. The average value is significantly lower because the USB data processor and strain through USB and again small "pauses for reflection" to appeal.
This compares with Firewire is a constant stream of 400 Mb / s. It can perform a little test that everyone (with appropriate hardware itself):
Move / copy time 20 GB of data to an external hard drive to another external hard drive. During the copying of s.Schnellsten Firewire to Firewire (and the rest of Windows is currently synonymous calculated quite accurately) is rocking, two USB hard disks far enough that the same process about three times as long! In addition, the Windows of Time partially calculated varies considerably, depending on the current, actual transmission rate of the two USB hard disks.
One can indeed consider synonymous with a single, external hard drive, but with two devices can see the difference even clearer.
Antwort von www.diemedientechniker.co:
www.diemedientechniker.de
www.diemedientechniker.com
Antwort von wolfgang:
Pretty - as a commercial advertising, especially without any further information, here is one actually removed.
Antwort von Markus:
A commercial site, where a window now with 1 & 1 rises advertising? Which company (except 1 & 1 itself) makes such a thing? ;-)
Antwort von schurald:
I make it synonymous with VDL 2006plus of D8 with firewire to an external USB2 HDD. With USB1 is with me at all. Since the video stutters quite extreme, because half of all rausfallen frames.
Can someone help me with VDL? Recording of about 1:20 hours after the operation aborts mostly because 4GB is reached, or simply as synonymous, because the host PC's 9GB of free space to 70MB, and can degrade not take up next. It's really the Verzwatzle, because if I then start a second connection to compromise recording, despite the end product preview with video black screen with sound. Now I sit for days with this issue before the PC and am about to me a DVD recorder with HDD and iLink to buy so that all the crap times faster. At that moment I try it again with the recording in DV-AVI. Let's see, when there is closure.
Antwort von Captain Kirk:
The way I see you have not enough space on your chest. By doing this you still fairly inexpensive and can work well, I suggest you measly s external DVD recorder (Sun part to put under the television). Match the material in the device, close the fire s.and demuxer DVD (PG Demux). As a result, you'll receive a m2v file (video) and ne AC3 file (sound). N is the m2v file MPEG file in top quality (depending on the DVD Decoder here recommending s Sonyoder Samsung, they've built a good encoder in the hardware). Process which can then spend with the software Virtual Dub (freeware) and ...
Antwort von schurald:
exactly, that I have already thought synonymous. Although the return costs extra, but it saves much s.Zeit synonymous and costs that we consider do not necessarily (PC, which renders the whole night).
Have you da ne idea of what makes good shots? ILink and only needs good reception quality. Then I could synonymous directly digitize some VHS material.
Did you mean a recorder with HDD or do you mean, a pure DVD recorder synonymous did? Because I do not understand how this works, if one has, for example 1h 34min DV footage ... Only then does the DVD, what is going on in the best quality on it, or turn down the one quality mode, so that 4h would then perhaps go on it.
It is important to me to save the raw material in the best possible quality for further processing.
PS I had a trial basis a Philipps 3300H increased, but it has not work out how to somehow burn the 1h 34 Min of HDD to DVD in good quality (denial of service) because I took the material in almost the best quality and this is probably the 4.4 GB exceeded. I would have to take 2 steps worse ... then it would probably be gone.
Antwort von Markus:
Hello "schurald"
I'm not very clever from your contribution. The best quality for further processing is DV-AVI. However, it is only about digitizing and burning a DVD, then it would be synonymous to do a DVD recorder with flexible recording time (of the Panasonic can do so).
A combined Harddisks-/DVD-Recorder would in this case, perhaps the best in: Simple cuts are possible, it can be burned to a DVD films of varying length and by the way, the reader can still synonymous for receiving the television program.
) The time-shifted television (and skipping the advertising, I would no longer ignore. ;-)
Learn More:
"
Encoding Qualität DVD Recorder?
"
VHS / DVD recorder or PC? "
CD-vs. DVDs ... Durability
Antwort von schurald:
Good morning, "Mark", ;-)
I would actually do both: analog material to archive or recycle, in order to integrate it into home videos.
On the other hand, I would like my D8 tapes again rid of holiday videos and secure the material in the best possible quality. DV-AVI is clear that the best, but with 24GB but where for 2.5-3h film? So this must be some way to DVD. I consider it as already MPEGII on a 8.5 GB for DVD burn .... So not to play it in DVD player. Would indeed go, right? I think my LG4167b can DL.
Yes, the Panasonics I've watched before. At first I wanted the DMR10, then the 52nd, when I suddenly realized that no DV input have :-( Otherwise seem to be perfect. And the 60 is definitely too expensive to me.
Antwort von MiXMaster:
There are several Programs to record in MPEG2, but
you should think about what you have then with the video before.
Editing (cutting, DVD authoring with menu, join MGEG of) law requires a lot of computing power.
Your calculator is not exactly the fastest, you should be in place to share work with DV AVI, advantage is compatible with all programs.
External hard disks, I would caution, since for video editing
a high reading and writing required ist.Zum Download finished videos are external OK.
Since you have only 20 GB on the record, I consider the purchase of a further necessary (80-130 euros for 160-300 GB with 8 MB cache and 7, turns)
I do not know how large your disk is, but you should remember that) at about 30% of the capacity for maintenance (defrag needed sind.15% Windows calls, at least, but it takes a long time.
If the panel does not regularly deframentiert videos can even jerk when playing even though the file is in order, the system simply takes too long to be the fragments is then synonymous finden.Das the reason why the system crashes are inevitable.
For the calculation of the size, I'd say 3 x video file size, plus around 30% for 90 minutes film equal to 80 GB partition and editing videos ready for another partition to store.
This dimension is my experience value. about 24 GB of source file, plus 20-24
GB and 20 GB of target file to the temporary borders.
I give a self-created movie just in time from DV AVI, because it is easier for the Calculator transitions, overlays and Articles swie sound elements
process without having to simultaneously encode in MPEG2.
Make the MPEG2 encoding in DVD quality with I finished shooting, so I made it about 3 years ago with an AMD 1200 processor, 512 MB RAM and 160 GB of disk auszukommen.Für his work on the absolute limit range, the system must, however, top, for already a verrödelte
was the hard drive crash.
Antwort von m00n:
Thanks for guest who was very helpful!
Antwort von Stefan:
Hi,
I have a tape (Hi8) with 100 minutes duration.
On my harddrive I have 20Gb free.
Since I Resolutioncapturen in DVD (want 720 * x) it is as AVI too big.
Is there a way aufzunehemen directly as MPEG? So that I can then burn the MPEG to DVD?
I'm really s.verzweifeln. Especially since I want to buy me a new hard drive.
Help a beginner! ;)
Many thanks, greetings. Some DVD Programs can do this example, it may, the Power Producer of CyberLink. But you should have a rel. have powerful calculator for that. From PowerProducer there to test a demo version. http://www.cyberlink.com/english/products/2004/index.jsp#Cat26
Good luck
The fat Stefan
Antwort von schurald:
I give a self-created movie just in time from DV AVI, because it is easier for the Calculator transitions, overlays and Articles swie sound elements to be processed simultaneously without having to encode to MPEG2. Make the MPEG2 encoding in DVD quality with I finished shooting, so I made it about 3 years ago with an AMD 1200 processor, 512 MB Ram and 160 GB get on board. I have a Laptop with P4 3 Ghz, 512MB, and an external 250GB of Samsung for 118 ¬ with 5400 revolutions) (because fainter. I will, as you say it with VDL the Project as a DV-AVI export, and then convert the finished movie in MPEGII.
So far I've tried to make it the other way around (MPEGs, however, were always much smaller than now), because with VDL can pull almost any format to the timeline and then export it again as easy MPEGII. There are synonymous then the function of "no re-rendering of MPEG files, but I did not notice any difference (so far) bezügl. activation of the last option.
hmmmm as synonymous, but I want to secure the raw material (and this DV is just too big), I should probably stick to my method ... otherwise I have double duty.
Antwort von Stefan:
hmmmm as synonymous, but I want to secure the raw material (and this DV is just too big), I should probably stick to my method ... otherwise I have double duty. Sorry, that's just as if it depreciates his Books (OEM MiniDVBänder) from the book shelves to fuse (recoded) and It utilizes an Spickzettelformat (MPEG, DivX), because they are so nice and small. It is a waste of time and energy to use and will be the backups in the event of cases for reasons of quality is not synonymous.
The only purpose s.den Spickzetteln I see is that it preserves its original books (tapes) and that one thick Books (DV tapes plus player dragging) does not have to, if you will) show times just read somewhere else (which
Good luck
The fat Stefan
