Frage von sergo:
Hello people, I have a question!
And although I have with my friends ne canon xl1 bought to shoot video clips!
short time later of what I've heard the JVC GY-5100 Professional!
want to just ask if it's worth the change and which one is better!
know one has bought the camera but I can reach the lation to, not because he is on geschäftsreisekontakt! the nutzJVC GY-5100 Professional with Fujinon A22X7, 8BERM-M48B objectively!
me can someone please write something about the jvc gy 5100 whether the professional is better than the xl1 or not! objectively, and perhaps even to that!
would be super nice! Thank you!
Antwort von Nightfly!:
Look here:
http://www.videoaktiv.de/dokumente/bestenliste.pdf
http://forum.slashcam.de/gibt-es-so-einen-camcorder-uberhaupt-vt29748.html?start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=jvc
Antwort von Strahlemann:
Hello!
Before you now with a list of pro and contra compose there once to answer a fundamental question:
What did you do with the front of the camera?? The JVC is an
ENG (Electronic News Gathering), the synonymous Camera is designed for such.
In comparison to the XL1, the JVC damn sharp edges (in the picture area) while the Canon has a very strong anti-aliasing.
If you have you now set for TV production industry and contributions you with the JVC definitely the better choice.
As soon as you this question you can answer me and we can be happy to elaborate on various matters, because I regularly deal with two camera models to ...
Antwort von sergo:
Hello!
Before you now with a list of pro and contra compose there once to answer a fundamental question:
What did you do with the front of the camera??
The JVC is an ENG (Electronic News Gathering), the synonymous Camera is designed for such.
In comparison to the XL1, the JVC damn sharp edges (in the picture area) while the Canon has a very strong anti-aliasing.
If you have you now set for TV production industry and contributions you with the JVC definitely the better choice.
As soon as you this question you can answer me and we can be happy to elaborate on various matters, because I regularly deal with two camera models to ... Turn Of special benefit sion videoklips and short films!
Many have read about the xl1 and drum I bought them! because the "most realistic" film look makes!
We usually rotate video clips for bands!
even if the money is there, why not??
please can you tell me about the Fujinon A22X7, 8BERM-M48B write objectively something?
would be very nice!
Antwort von Strahlemann:
What do you want to know about the Lens??
The technical specifications?
http://expandore.com/product/add/Lenses/ Fujinon / A22X7.8% 20BERM_BERD.htm
As for the 'Film Look' concerns so there are endless Disskusionen what now goes with everything ...
What is certain is that several factors and to belong is synonymous sure that a "smearing" Camera is not the most important.
If you want to make short films so appealing is the camera (in my opinion) is not your primary care but a good script, a good set design, well posited light, etc.
The Picture can be influenced in the post still is - a bad idea or bad Completed (not because I am speaking from experience * g *)!
If you say that you do with the coal then the recorded music of the Canon JVC Vorrausgesetzt would be preferable (and you earn enough so that the customer wants) a better picture, because here you can link multiple cameras to each other (TC) and you already own because of The viewfinder höherauflösenden faster sharpening can.
In addition, you can, without additional paraphernalia, infect a balanced XLR signal and you've linked audio.
The configuration options compared to the Canon is synonymous much better ...
The list could result in a long time, but not effective ...
As long as you push (or customer), but with your camera s.keine limits you do not want one, I would really recommend buying new ...
Antwort von Rasmus:
Moin from Hamburg.
First, I am a little surprised. The CANON XL 1 is the JVC absolutely no Comparison. It's like Porsche to Fiat 500 But the low number of pixels (in spite of pixel shift), the CANON XL 1, which indeed has been synonymous for some years under his belt, causes a poorer image quality is orders of all the parameters ... Lenses on I will just say nothing.
In my opinion, the XL would be more accurate Comparison 2nd I myself switched to a 3 / 4 years of the JVC GY-DV 500 (predecessor of 5100) with 19x CANON Optics with one laughing and one eye on the weineneden XL 2nd My reasons were important for my projects, opportunities for true 16:9 display, and a true 25p mode. Outstanding is the XL 2 the possibility of many image parameters in the menu manual influence. The image quality is at least equivalent.
Painfully, I miss the manual Optics, the b / w viewfinder, the significantly higher sensitivity and better handling of the shoulder. OK, Optics and viewfinder can be upgraded, but it costs twice as much together as the camera ...
Gurndsätzlich is considered synonymous, the accessories (Batteries, etc.) for the XL 2 provides far more favorable than for the JVC.
At the of you mentioned Fujinon Optics:
I myself have not yet worked with this lens, however, is the shortest focal length of 7.8 mm but legal. Here you will certainly need an appropriate resolution or even an extra wide angle. Also, the price of Optics is expected to be several times the price of the camera ... otherwise surely a great Lens.
Greeting
Rasmus
Antwort von Markus:
Hello "Sergo"
it makes no sense, and post questions doppppelt to dreiiifach. The identical (unanswered) posts I've deleted. ;-)
Further reading:
Antwort von Jan:
Hello Sergo,
The differences between the two models are really very abundant (as you have already written JVC Professional!)
The hit of Industry, news and documentary filmmakers DV 500 came in early 2000, in the successor DV 5000 (early 2003) and now the latest DV 5100 (1 models DV)
The new DV 5100 is synonymous finally a anamorphic 16:9 mode, with progressive recording siehts are still badly off. Thanks to the electronic amplification circuit can now be pushed up to 63 DB. She still takes Mini DV, DV and DV Cam Only (playing) into the same drive
A new high-head drum with 4 heads were installed, and with the 24 bit signal processing and the good lenses already described represents each of the DV 5100 Picture of a Canon XL 1 in the shade.
High-quality IT - CCD's you can find in Canon None. There are certainly still 100
significant differences.
A test report comes out Friday in VAD, I'm excited.
If the money is there why not, but the camera speaks to the aforementioned filmmakers, actually less for a music video. If the video but rotated with less light, the picture of an XL 1or 2 clearly noisy, and there would be a DV 5100 times already points.
Is to compare well with a four-wheel jeep is driven only in the city, instead of in his "territory" to the mountains or woods.
But Luke, the models better (often known) and I only use the models of hearing, seeing, reading know, just try, I would trust his opinion.
LG
January
Antwort von sergo:
Hello Sergo,
The differences between the two models are really very abundant (as you have already written JVC Professional!)
The hit of Industry, news and documentary filmmakers DV 500 came in early 2000, in the successor DV 5000 (early 2003) and now the latest DV 5100 (1 models DV)
The new DV 5100 is synonymous finally a anamorphic 16:9 mode, with progressive recording siehts are still badly off. Thanks to the electronic amplification circuit can now be pushed up to 63 DB. She still takes Mini DV, DV and DV Cam Only (playing) into the same drive
A new high-head drum with 4 heads were installed, and with the 24 bit signal processing and the good lenses already described represents each of the DV 5100 Picture of a Canon XL 1 in the shade.
High-quality IT - CCD's you can find in Canon None. There are certainly still 100
significant differences.
A test report comes out Friday in VAD, I'm excited.
If the money is there why not, but the camera speaks to the aforementioned filmmakers, actually less for a music video. If the video but rotated with less light, the picture of an XL 1or 2 clearly noisy, and there would be a DV 5100 times already points.
Is to compare well with a four-wheel jeep is driven only in the city, instead of in his "territory" to the mountains or woods.
But Luke, the models better (often known) and I only use the models of hearing, seeing, reading know, just try, I would trust his opinion.
LG
January http://www.cyberthug.de/user_30326.html
