Frage von ragemein:
Hello!
I have a question s.alle times here in the forum. I have a few days ago one of the last safe Vorfürmodelle bought the JVC GY-HD251. Now I've read many reviews on the predecessor of the 100 and 200 series.
Can anyone here tell his experience to what extent the known weaknesses of predecessors such as the emerging Spitscreen - problem or blurring s.Aperture 11 of JVC bzw.verbessert were resolved?
I had no time yet to test the device in detail. With my old 5000 I have made up on recurring dead pixels in any case only good experiences. Therefore I again chose a JVC, was synonymous when many negative reports about the first model.
I would be happy but if someone tells me his experience. So bad is the device not be safe and I hope that JVC is in this series now has improved somewhat synonymous. If I have any good if one knows the weaknesses of the camera before. I've found so far no detailed reports about it. Maybe someone can help.
Ralf
Antwort von WoWu:
Hi Ralph,
We have worked relatively long with the models 100 and 200th
In this case, however, used synonymous with the corresponding adapter 16mm film lenses.
To the tuning of the split screen has changed nothing about the 100, but generally synonymous operation does not cause any trouble. And who will have only gray area?
The divided sensors have the advantage that JVC with 6 instead of 3 AD converter works (HSTR) and can produce 50 frames s.Output without the clock speed goes up. By the way, the images are synonymous in s.Output 4:2:2 before .... synonymous with the 100 the way that rules really no 50 pictures.
Concerning the diffraction can (and has) change anything because this is a visual problem associated with is the 1 / 3 "sensors.
This error will you find so synonymous with other cameras.
We always work with NDs and the beneficial Aperture. There is no reason for us to use in the small sensors, smaller apertures.
So we always get the maximum lens performance and there is no real problem to work with NDs.
If you still have the 16 mm lens, well worth the purchase a 17 mm lens, which are getting back to back and priced at E-Bay.
The 16 mm standard lens but differs in quality from quite considerably.
Note: The 17er has a larger filter thread, if you want on it because that is what screws. the filters (intentions) of the 16er are there too small.
Otherwise, the 250 is a beautiful and durable camera, with which the gentlemen (and synonymous, I have always walked out happy.
As for the dead pixel, you can even listen in the menu.
Otherwise, the camera makes very nice, balanced images and behaves synonymous in the upper part very soft. You'll enjoy it.
Einwenig synonymous worth the effort in a new color balance when a white sphere your dealer has. But this is not a must.
Antwort von ragemein:
Hi Wolfgang!
Thank you for the quick reply. I think so synonymous that the camera delivers great pictures if you know their weaknesses and can handle it. Since I will use it mainly for recording of events, the aperture problem is certainly secondary. For outdoor shots, I could screw synonymous in addition to the built-NDs an exta ND filter. I still have a right of B & W there. That you can delete here the dead pixel itself is synonymous class. I have found here in the forum already synonymous as it is deleted and the pixels. The only thing I do not think so great is the intensity of the 251st No Comparison to my old GY-DV 5000th However, the so synonymous 1 / 2 inch chips. Too bad that was not built here synonymous. But the gain seems to work out of Gries education.
The streaks of bright light when shooting are certainly synonymous s.den smaller chips. Again, the 5000 is much more better. But times of standard DV will probably slow to an end and therefore I am compelled synonymous to HD switch to next to stay in business.
A question yet to close: What is the exact name of the 17mm lens. Since the delivery of course the 16 mm standard lens it was a transition is sure to improve on a 17er a lot of sense to image quality.
Best regards Ralf
Antwort von WoWu:
Hi Ralf
TH17x5BRMU
5-85mm 1:1.4
Is the exact description.
If I can help else ... anytime.
