Frage von Chefdenker:
Hello.
I want to buy me shortly publish a camcorder and came across after looking at the JVC GZ-MG models. From memory my focus is on her 50s or 70s. I wanted to know if someone has already made a positive or negative experience with one of these models.
I do not know whether one is better off with) 0.69 megapixels, but with video light (50's model, or do better with 1.23 megapixel video resolution, but without a video light, but with flash that is relevant only for photos (70 model).
The photo function is actually uninterresant for me, since I already own a good digicam.
I would be grateful if I could help someone next
Antwort von molch:
Hi,
So in the hand I had the mg20, which is after the picture of how the quali mg50, right?
I could not find the inspiring, the picture looked dull, blurred, and the cam was bad in the hand.
the English language if you're powerful, but just look at that time to:
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/JVC-GZ-MG70-Camcorders-Review.htm
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/JVC-GZ-MG30-Camcorders-Review.htm
Antwort von Markus:
... or better yet with 1.23 megapixel video resolution ... Hello,
this is a mistake. Any DV camcorder (DV, MiniDV, Digital8, DVCAM) records the same video frame size: 720 × 576 pixels. The remaining pixels are usfür digital and electronic Image Stabilization used. At best, many pixels will be interpolated from the final video image. - An exception are HDV camcorders, save the fact a higher Resolutionbeim video image.
For pure video recordings, it tends to be even advantageous, if the image intensifier is not "has too many" pixels. For here is the following principle: The bigger the CCD area and the fewer pixels, the better the sensitivity. That is, a contrario, that a higher pixel count at the expense of image quality in poor lighting.
Learn More:
"
Mehr Pixel = Größere Datenmengen?
"
Auto Focus in Low Light - Sonyoder Panasonic?
