Newsmeldung von slashCAM: James Cameron on 3D HD - like ordering of s.Starbucks ... heidi - 20 Apr 2008 19:01:00
Hollywood has known that the 3D technology from the oblivion fetched (we reported on several occasions) and James Cameron in a prominent advocate of Stereoscopic found. He has his next SF movie "Avatar", the end of the year in the local cinemas will be in 3D with two cameras produced (in part - a little CGI is of course synonymous therein). Used were the so-called Sony Fusion 3D Camera System consisting of two HDC-950 cameras in a special structure of the firm Pace HD, which of none other than Cameron himself was co.
In this lengthy e-mail interview with the Variety says Cameron, s.3D what excites him and how he is the future. According to him the effect stereoscopic picture just so genuine and appropriate to hide the fact that movies always just an illusion show. However, synonymous with 3-D shooting action in the most important thing, and the 3D space when only a powerful addition to be synonymous. This alone made the need apparent that the films have traditionally been synonymous, if not dreidimendsionale projection is possible. The whole thing should be about "like ordering s.Starbucks. Lots of choices. If the new media of the last decade has taught us anything, it is that people like choices, and they like control." So for a fistful of dollars more to get the XL-Verion in 3D to see - that the efforts of Hollywood, finally with the breakthrough 3D to create is synonymous with the competitive pressures of the home theater said of Cameron, incidentally is more than hinted. Also known as copy protection, there are a lot of 3D.
But not only 3D and digital movies Cameron has pleased, no, he dares to synonymous in the movies is commonly perceived as a sacred number 24 as an outdated view. Instead of 24 frames per second at 4K he would 2K at 48 fps ... Interesting reading so Sunday (link below).
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von Axel:
A very interesting interview. 3D or "stereo" will never prevail as long as it is dependent on glasses.
Time will, however, the frame rate to double. Dual frequency means higher picture resolution, not only of the movement, but the image synonymous. And in contrast to "Stereo" is the cost low.
Antwort von beiti:
Somewhere JC says in the interview that he wanted to first implement 3D and then 48 fps, because it is not all battles can simultaneously beat. I am afraid that is where he s.der wrong priorities. First you should fix the old problems and then only on new technologies to consider. 3D may not yet anyway "masses" as long as there is no brillenlose projection technology to do so. In contrast, 48 fps could now be an improvement of the 2D cinemas profitably be introduced.
Cameron and other influential film-makers should now, therefore, at the beginning of the digital cinema era, very strongly the establishment of 48 fps support. Finally, the hideous 24-fps Geruckel but one of the annoyances of the oldest cinema technology. Even if some people there (besides the bad image stand / Zitter image) as part of the "film look" feel - it remains a technical problem and a major limitation for the camera work.
True is synonymous Camerons argument 4k Resolutionsei excessive, and 2k with 48 fps in any case to lengths better than 4k with jerky 24 fps.
Antwort von Carina:
So for me, Cameron is one of the most boring Filmmakers become. He has perhaps a name in the film industry, but that is synonymous everything .....
Antwort von Carina:
The 2 K-Resolutiondürfte enough, since he has been right, but an entirely different question is whether one of the first movie series still pixels may or may not detect the expected and at 2 K have been the case (but could be eliminated by upscaling )
True is synonymous, that the whole Geschwafle the film look that even some p.24 down 25p, or want a complete nonsense. If not its technical and financial considerations have led, it would now no longer give
Antwort von Steffunk:
Yes, first frame rate increase, 3D can wait until it really is mature ...
I suggest 50 fps, not 48th The number 48 is only a doubling, at least 50 is already out of the PAL field. Thus, annoying frame rates Convert omitted.
Why must always refer to the old building? That was with the eternal line method (which is now finally slowly dissolved) like that. I can not quite understand ...
Antwort von beiti:
The 2 K-Resolutiondürfte enough, since he has been right, but an entirely different question is whether one of the first movie series still pixels may or may not detect the expected and at 2 K have been the case (but could be eliminated by upscaling ) At least in bigger cinema halls, you will certainly 4k beamer use - even for reasons of Zukunfssicherheit. Beamer and movies are usually in 3-DLP technology built and have a barely visible pixel grid. That can not be with the Picture of any cheap LCD projector compare, where the pixels Stege almost as wide as the pixels themselves.
I suggest 50 fps, not 48th The number 48 is only a doubling, at least 50 is already out of the PAL field. Thus, annoying frame rates Convert omitted. That would be for us Europeans of advantage, but for the Americans at a disadvantage - and give the film now in the sound at times. Fernseh-/Videosysteme compatibility is very important because the bulk of the profits are no longer with the movie-evaluation, but with the TV and DVD business is done.
Although I am still puzzle how to tidy 48 fps on NTSC-based video (60 fields) transfers. This runs out on the reduction to 24 fps and then 2/3-Pulldown - and so is the advantage of higher speed at least on SD video then. Also in the HD field to my knowledge, there is still no standard for 48 fps.
There were times early on, a movie with 60 fps Standard introduced. Cameron described this as overkill (because tests have shown that the advantage against 48 fps is very low), but 60 fps would be less compatibility problems.
Antwort von Valentino:
True is synonymous, that the whole Geschwafle the film look that even some p.24 down 25p, or want a complete nonsense. If not its technical and financial considerations have led, it would now no longer give So until now I have the 24 pictures have never been disturbed, just as per a normal movie-goers on a 2k DLP projection has excited. Yes the same answer my hundreds of nerds, you are on the Schlimé Pixle in the first row could be upset, but then you bestlle cards in the rearmost row.
And these financial considerations lead even in our time, the 2 Perf back "In" is as synonymous and Arri cameras such Atton gives un builds. What among other things, yet it is, the film material is still very expensive.
Antwort von Axel:
So until now I have the 24 pictures have never been disturbed, just as per a normal movie-goers on a 2k DLP projection has excited. Exactly.
I wrote above, the article was interesting, but about as interesting as a pure science fiction speculation.
The advocates of 3D are global players, Cameron and Lucas know before money is no longer a and from them and they are technically unsuspecting shareholders on fairy tales. The problem is that it dares to None more critical of their idiocy kommentieren. At least that Lucas no longer anything on the chain on it can be seen from the interview in the current Cinema conclude: "The myth of the Crystal Skull (Indiana Jones) I was always busy.
All this with innovation has little to do. These guys have once started with little and have bluffed well, so the films that her breakthrough, after much longer ignore. Play it again bluff, because they still have the same stupid tricks in stock, by too much money and power in crazy inflated dimensions. Wahn.
To content innovation, the uptake of new issues, it is not. To artistic innovation, to finding enhanced perception of internal or external conditions, does not. The whole is similar Chose philistinism and cheesy like a Copperfield Magic Show. New toys for a few lunatic who produce hollow illusions, and the audience will say Wow briefly, and then disappear the whole spook in the parks.
The old movie is almost dead it must be technically upgraded, clear, but technology alone will not save it. Not more than indirectly, by the fact that the D-Cinema productions little easier. Fresh winds. Movie of the bottom.
