Frage von dwickeroth:![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
Hello,
I would like to take a bluescreen film making, with a moving camera to be deployed. To render the contents of the artificial image exactly the same camera settings and paths to use, I would like the car from the video can be calculated.
Since there are a lot of synonymous scientific articles over it, and that will be synonymous, but a software which I still can not be found.
I imagine this: video into the software inside, and back out, a reconstructed 3D model of the scene, intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameters and the Kamerapfad. Because someone knows what?
Many greetings,
Daniel
Antwort von thos-berlin:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
I think this software is - if they exist at all - rather his unaffordable. (I rather suspect that such software does not exist. Not everything from James Bond shooting there really ;-)
I fear it will be much cheaper, the parameters of the camera crane recorded. Perhaps by the fitting of sensors, the position of the joint determine jeweiliegen (possibly pot). The recording of the camera parameters (zoom and focus, if necessary), however, is not so simple.
Or the other way Kamerakran motorize and from the model to manage .... (Computer-controlled camera giobt since Star Wars ....)
Antwort von KrischanDO:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
Moin,
a software program, with the two cameras to record movement of an object, a motion is calculated and derived from it, another object is positioned in Robokeeper (www.robokeeper.de) are used.
If we take the ball a CameraLink observed synonymous has the 3D data.
Regards
Christian
[/ url]
Antwort von Mylenium:
Hello,
I would like to take a bluescreen film making, with a moving camera to be deployed. To render the contents of the artificial image exactly the same camera settings and paths to use, I would like the car from the video can be calculated.
Since there are a lot of synonymous scientific articles over it, and that will be synonymous, but a software which I still can not be found.
I imagine this: video into the software inside, and back out, a reconstructed 3D model of the scene, intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameters and the Kamerapfad. Because someone knows what?
Many greetings,
Daniel 3DEqualizer, PFTrack. But actually you bridle of the horse to rear. Why not be "simple" Camera Match Moving? If the camera position is available and the dimensions in your 3D program hinhaut, isses so really no problem, manual to build the scene and by the Projection Mapping Textures deductible mature. in the league and go with Voodoo, PFHoe and Syntheyes much pocket-friendly price areas go. So a few markers s.den bluescreen and paperboard s.geht he ...
Mylenium
Antwort von dwickeroth:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
Hello,
thank you first for help.
The solution of KrischanDO seems to me something umständluch because I still need a second camera (or even a third, because it is probably a stereo vision approach), the first film in the camera filming ... Headache!
@ berlin-thos: a Kamerakran there is not only a very nomales Tripod that no movements recorded.
@ Mylenium: The Program, I look at it (if that is somehow to make). The "simple" Camera Match Moving I understand, however, not entirely, or I'm not sure what to bring me, because the camera position is not precisely known. Ok, I could be measured, but what if the camera moves?
Gruß,
Daniel
Antwort von thos-berlin:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
I think that there is a lack of sensors is absolutely necessary, in the blue markings indicating from which one's position and the distance between the camera can identify. More suitable as a reference image content does not Bluebox yes ...
Just as an example: With a "technical" camera movement around the object (eg a flying broom) is not apparent whether "mathematical art" means a change of flight direction Besens be shown, so the background remains the same, or whether it is a "künstrerische" camera around the object, so the background would also change ...
Antwort von B.DeKid:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
http://www.realviz.com/
Very good! Since the first beta versions of very fine-tuned their PROGIS.
Antwort von JerryTrumpet:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
http://www.pfhoe.com/index.htm
... because there were times as a what I had tested on the Internet and it cost nothing, but unfortunately I deleted the name ... while the above is still affordable ...
Greeting
Jerry