Frage von JoeFX:Hello first!
I work for a long time with the JVC Gr x5e. Unfortunately I have to admit that this camcorder in artificial light, quickly losing the image quality. Also, I can not open the Aperture indoors next so I can create depth of field.
Hence my question:
What you would really recommend the camcorder around the same options as the manual function of the x5e possess?
Because I want to sell me a VX1000 and soon grow here, I ask one more question: this camcorder or any other sufficient.
The price should be at max. 1000 ¬ may be a little bit about it.
Thanks in advance
MFG JoeFX
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
In the main question, which is recommendable camera, I can not help you.
But the aperture should open next, as soon as you use filters a Nd. Actually, there have interiors but so s.sich that usually not as much light is available, so the aperture would have to be here just wide open. Can it be then that, then your cam on an amplifier dazuschaltet (rustles the Picture?)? That would explain the poorer quality.
Antwort von JoeFX:
Image noise is indeed the big problem.
Since I my next film entirely in one house, and I may turn to take any additional lights I would need a good camcorder for darker scenes.
If anyone has a good recommendation, please report as soon as possible!
MFG JoeFX
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Your Camorder has too small chips with too high a resolution. Up to 1000 ¬ you will probably see no problem with your camcorder chips thoroughly tolerable, perhaps 1 / 3 "CCDs and have not the same 5 megapixel SUPPOSED to 1 / 4, 5" CCDs Hallow ... (DV = 720x576Pixel, everything about it goes, turns the light intensity) no favors. You only need to expect miracles but it s.6000 ¬ when the chips exceed the 1 / 2 "mark.
But why are you allowed to bring any light? In a pinch, it synonymous doing a DIY reflector, which is used as a wall or ceiling luminaires. Or you make on dogma95? Then you still must still enough to light a lamp peg to the camera.
Antwort von JoeFX:
The light is something with the stupid. This is a public building. I can only turn when no one is here or if I did not attract attention. So I can just shoot without additional light. Tentatively, I still bright with Foamboards on but not quite enough.
So therefore nothing is under 6000 ¬? It must not be so extreme. The problem is that even my old Hi8 camcorder deliver better results.
Is there a bright Dreichipper under 2000 ¬?
MFG JoeFX
Antwort von AndyZZ:
So I find my SonyHC1000 fairly bright. I once filmed in Naples in an underground cavern where the water was slightly lit underground and was amazed at how good was the Picture: not really a noise and still see almost everything.
Problem: the HC1000 you will hardly get more ...
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
So therefore nothing is under 6000 ¬? It must not be so extreme. I meant it synonymous only in extreme cases where one needs only a light bulb still clear despite the shade. But I think that you will get on in this building synonymous with a camcorder under 1000 ¬. It may just not be such an unfavorable combination of chip size and Resolutionwie in your current JVC. I believe you every word that your old Hi8 can cope better in a darker environment than the JVC. Otherwise, you rent a good camcorder for a few days. You have to buy so not the same everything, just because their own equipment once s.The pushes boundaries.
Antwort von JoeFX:
@ AndyZZ
HC1000 Thanks for the tip!
Schleich @ Michel
The JVC camcorder is just an outdoor ...
Maybe I should try it with the HC1 or HC3. Originally I wanted to buy one of the two ...
I think I'll wait to try the meantime FX7 s.and cope with my MV700 or the X5 ...
Thanks for your answers.
MFG JoeFX