Frage von imfocus:
Hi all, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I am in possession of a SonyNex FS100 and right now I ask myself the Question, what should I buy my Lenses, which naturally accompany me for a long time and are therefore future-proof. Good Lenses are not exactly cheap and that's why I want to buy 1x and work with them long. The Lenses are to be filmed for Mainly, however, synonymous a.meiner 550d may be useful, but priority is filming. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e The FS100 has indeed an e-mount, I have ofCanonein 70-200 2.8 are here. But now my Question, Lenses dieCanonEf the film are well suited and synonymous Future-proof, or a Zeiss Objectively with manual aperture ring, the better alternative (or less with nikon mount on e-maount with adapter, and then an adapter for my 550d). Of course, Zeiss are expensive, but once you buy one and you have it forever, if not forever. I'll probably still get the 24-70 8.2 because I like working with zoom .... But I get the difference between NEM and a Zeiss Ef Objectively viewed, the image difference was enormous \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e would be glad if I can help someone with experience. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Thank you, mfg imfocus
 |
Antwort von Filmo:
Sonye of Mount aufCanonEF brauchts NEN adapter, but the purely mechanical, noble ends setting (only open Aperture) except by the cumbersome procedure using a Canon-carried electronic exchange (which you own but with the 550D)
Antwort von Frank B.:
error:
Antwort von imfocus:
Thank you for your answer. \u003cbr /\u003e But have the 18-200 kit. \u003cbr /\u003e But I think the higher quality Lenses are better suited to film. But the st just all a Question of money :-)
Antwort von Frank B.:
Yes, the dear money. The best waer, we would have again as much money left over for Lenses like for the camera. But at least this is not the case with me. At least not quickly. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e It is of course synonymous with lenses always depends on what you want to do. I make films such as more travel and less scenic work. For my other movies need as Lenses for scenic work. I shoot very often in churches and museums. Since there is both good if you have a few bright Lenses. On the other hand, I must sometimes choose for close-ups and telephoto settings can not hit anywhere with a tripod. Therefore I am personally a telephoto with image stabilization is very important. \u003cbr /\u003e In the scenic rotation can make a slight change of objective time. That's not many of my situations. So I need synonymous zoom lenses. There will therefore accumulate a lot over the years. So I need anyway to make compromises in performance and price. Also, because I am an amateur and not earn money with my film.
|
