Frage von gaga:
Hi! I want to film an interview in a room and ask myself whether I still needed extra light for it. Maybe 1-2 lights? If anyone can advise me what should I maybe could or what wattage? I have found that it synonymous HMI and tungsten are, what are they there for differences and what is better?
Thanks for your answer!
Antwort von schlaflos011:
http://www.hackermovies.com/ausleuchten-einfuehrung
http://www.camgaroo.com/artikel/single/details/der-light-workshop-teil-1/
http://www.movie-college.de/filmschule/light/lichtfuehrung.htm
http://www.lichtset.de/
http://www.videogrip.net/lights-lighting-kit-c-7_15
I bought this book several years ago and am still so very happy.
http://www.amazon.de/chinesische-Sonne-scheint-immer-unten% C2% AB/dp/3867641110/ref = sr_1_fkmr0_1? ie = UTF8 & qid = 1282643753 & sr = 8-1-fkmr0
Antwort von tommyb:
Krass ... na when the interview is not in the pants: D
Antwort von gaga:
hey thanks, great links!
I once was but in an interview here, where has the cameraman set up a lamp beeen at a tripod that was fairly light (I guess daylight) and next nothing. How to do it because in general on television, always with three light sources or so?
Antwort von deti:
http://www.google.de/search?q=3+punkt+light
Deti
Antwort von gaga:
hm, so yes.
Can you actually use already existing light (windows, ceiling light, etc) or you need more light sources for this? When can I take pictures for example. wonderful if I use available light with f2. or assume it is synonymous with film?
Antwort von Bernd E.:
In principle, one can use existing light, of course, but whether it works synonymous in special cases, depends on many factors of which can not be generalized.
Antwort von deti:
It is really synonymous no preference whether the light is set correctly crafted. I think the scene should just simply look good - it is often sufficient to put the interviewee at the place where the lighting situation of the house look good. One need not necessarily synonymous a highlight - there looks like the rear side of incident light from a window beautiful. Also you can comfortably work with foldable reflectors and manage the natural light at the place where it is needed at the scene.
Deti
Antwort von crassmike:
It is really synonymous no preference whether the light is set correctly crafted. I think the scene should just simply look good - it is often sufficient to put the interviewee at the place where the lighting situation of the house look good. One need not necessarily synonymous a highlight - there looks like the rear side of incident light from a window beautiful. I agree fully to ... Now that I have with me my first few posts here made the television internship mistaken ideas about the lighting (and regularly as a newcomer to the area a little'm desperate), I push now quite well with it, put the light so that before everything looks natural.
The glossy look with lace, etc. I find the studio super, but if you still end up s.einer naturally not as well-lit location with the perfect TV-Look, I think, can mess up the atmosphere synonymous something ... Use of natural light, with lights brighten and strengthen / or dark areas - fits aand. ;)
MfG
Antwort von gaga:
what do you use because of flood light? day or artificial light? the former seem to be so mad bright, vllt then something is too much of a good room for one? the flood light of the tatort-rotating team has almost half the lightened road ..
Antwort von KSProduction:
hey thanks, great links!
I once was but in an interview here, where has the cameraman set up a lamp beeen at a tripod that was fairly light (I guess daylight) and next nothing. How to do it because in general on television, always with three light sources or so? you can light source with a course already do ne good recording. But with three sources of light you get the professional way (to guide light and illuminate ).... helpful is a good and large monitor. that would be s.sichersten
