Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Here is the news message with links and images on the pages slashCAM Magazine
Antwort von cutty:
I EditShare has told the truth. I am very happy :-)
Antwort von benito:
Is it already known what, how much each cost codes are?
Antwort von Maui:
really is almost too good to be true. hopefully the additional options and codecs remain affordable.
it would not be possible that light works on already installed other codecs may use editing programs that are already on the system?
what is in 3rd party support, the entry premiere understand plug-ins? LightWorks is the plug-in folder and then access Premiere of effects such as the ultra keyer, color study II, ... synonymous use?
Antwort von WoWu:
That's exactly the way .....
Basic and good NLE codecs buy separately.
This can be something. Let's see.
Sorry, no information about how to support 10bit.
Antwort von jwd96:
Since the Macianer have once again the Pappnase. Again a year waiting for. Unless you ported it themselves
Antwort von NEEL:
At first glance, a free NLE is indeed a nice option, but at 20,000 subscribed editors (as much standing in the Lighworks-mail) of crop damage could be significant. Light Works has in recent years in rapid sequence changed the owner and apparently had None of which a real plan to go to where it should. So now the marketing department of the current (short?) Owner, the video server company EditShare has come up with the idea to release Light Works, appeared to accelerate the proliferation of niche NLEs and stimulate sales of server hardware. It therefore appears that Avid and Final Cut suffered bitter setbacks and other NLE's disappear from the market probably is the expensive development must now be scaled back at all ... Noting that no NLE is really expensive more, this alleged bargain could call in vain in the long term in any case more harm than good.
Antwort von WoWu:
Considering, however, that as Final Cut Pro is not already too consumer friendly and does not even support standards, but simply trying to push through their own codecs s.Markt the expense of the consumer, so such a move but synonymous helpful to such efforts to counteract.
Apart from the fact that in any case None knows whether there will be even more in the long run Final Cut Pro or iMovie not whether at some point in a per-rises.
Therefore, the thumbs up, I think. Synonymous and I would not mind if LW would establish itself in the professional sector. Who needs Final Cut Pro?
Antwort von NEEL:
Considering, however, that as Final Cut Pro is not already too consumer friendly and does not even support standards, but simply trying to push through their own codecs s.Markt the expense of the consumer, so such a move but synonymous helpful to such efforts to counteract.
Apart from the fact that in any case None knows whether there will be even more in the long run Final Cut Pro or iMovie not whether at some point in a per-rises.
Therefore, the thumbs up, I think. Synonymous and I would not mind if LW would establish itself in the professional sector. Who needs Final Cut Pro? True, but for Final Cut Pro you have to probably do not worry .... Either vanishes, which would actually not bad, or as long as the great Steve sold enough iPhones, this NLE will be artificially ventilated.
Actually, I only Avid tuts sorry, because this is a serious attack on a really good software, behind is a lot of experience ...
PS: Another scary thought - what if Light Works is the market leader, and the dwarf s.Boden Avid is simply EditShare of Apple is swallowed?
Antwort von WoWu:
Since I am fully in Dir :-( (
Antwort von cutty:
M $ is synonymous not gone down the drain because of OpenOffice and MSOffice developed awake next, though OO is sufficient for 99% of the applications.
Then, the developments in the Linux sector. Granted, not professional NLEs, but you can make it smaller projects. And do not forget: LightWorks is Open Source. As can be quickly created a community and develop it next. One can not turn that fast. I think sometimes halt.
Antwort von shipoffools:
If not there also a saying:
"What does no good, not synonymous," in the heads would haunt.
If you look, for example, software such as Audacity to which it is not synonymous creates programs such as Audition or Sound Forge to bankrupt the water, although in Audacity definitely potential there is, I'm skeptical that Lightworks will tremble as the market significantly.
Antwort von NEEL:
M $ is synonymous not gone down the drain because of OpenOffice and MSOffice developed awake next, though OO is sufficient for 99% of the applications.
How many paying users, Microsoft has a whole again? Only 500 million or even more than a billion?
At Avid, the number if I remember correctly, so between 50,000 and 100,000. Since 20 000 Umzügler can mean the end, mainly because there are so probably just be the stations that rely on Lightworks as an alternative and extension.
Antwort von JossJoss5000:
How many paying users, Microsoft has a whole again? Only 500 million or even more than a billion?
At Avid, the number if I remember correctly, so between 50,000 and 100,000. Since 20 000 Umzügler can mean the end, mainly because there are so probably just be the stations that rely on Lightworks as an alternative and extension. I've synonymous registered there, just out of curiosity, what may come of it.
20 000 20 000 registrations does not purchase intentions. On the contrary, what I came up there for the registry was actually just a newsletter.
LightWorks could but the potential for serious beginners have a software. When I think back and wonder if I have a nonlinear editing system with professional claim would have got a young age for free ...
If the thing which is good, the make sure quite a stir and bring the other Manufacturer in a tight spot. Both in terms of the feature as synonymous to the price (it would be nice if Apple with its Mac App Store is progressing and the individual Final Cut Studio Programs Verhoek there for about 99 to 149 ¬ a piece) would
