Frage von DennisP.:
Hello,
I am presently putting me deal with the issue of live recordings to. I want to produce next year as respectable recordings of events (concerts).
I have started schonmla 2 tests with one of AVM02 Numark, plus I borrowed from an acquaintance 4 mini-DV cameras. Distributed 3 of them on stands in the room and one thing I've s.Numark have been incorporated to the output signal via AV-IN on tape. The cables were cheap RCA 75ohms Of Reichelt. I always get the sound of a blender separately delivered. The result I was anything but enthusiastic.
Where should I start now:
1. If the AVM02 the RICHITGE for me? 4 inputs, preview opportunities for the individual channels, good Tonsektion. Enough features to fade, PIP, etc.
But is synonymous diser mixer designed for live recordings for the blending of 2 or more sources without high quality. The keys to select the channels, the RCA jacks so make much more like a DJ mixer, instead of an image mixer. What do you say to someone familiar with the equipment?
Another (the biggest) problem is: The AVM02 is my opinion, only with 4:3 deal as soon as I will point a camera at 16:9 to 4:3, the Picture s.Vorschaumonitor squeezed together.
Or what am I doing wrong?
Should I take into consideration the AVM02 to sell and buy a Se-500, or what can you recommend as under 1000 ¬?
2. The problem is, of course, cameras, together with the picture mixer.
I had imagined 4x HF200 + 4xStative to buy them and then connect via high-quality 4x BNC 50m cable drums with the Bildmsichr too. Yes I am already aware that I can not use an HD to the extent that if I simply a BNC cable from the AV-OUT leads to Bildmsicher. But in spite of the quality but we want something better than if I like an SD Mini Dv Camera plug in, right?
I hope the Se-500 can then deal with 16:9.
My problem is that I need cameras, which are relatively Lichtstark produce and a sharp picture. But the good old mini DVs around the ¬ 500-600 there is no longer there is only ncoh the NV-GS90 at 199 ¬, and then catch the HV40 with back in to 799 ¬, but what's with the middle class? Such cameras such as the NV-GS150-250 is no longer there.
And I would like to buy a uniform 4 identical cameras, so ebay is actually synonymous flat.
Kmaeras or what would you recommend for around 500 ¬ in this case. Makes the HF200 synonymous with a simple video cable without a good HD picture, or should I try it rather then a good old zb NV-GS250 come, how?
3. My 3rd Problem is the cable.
BNC ok if I buy the Se-500 even more so. The shortest route is 10m possibly the longest 40 meters.
Some 10-20m to buy or 4x 50m cable drum?
What cables exactly, and where buy?
4. The Recording:
That you think are the best way, the AV-in and then tied up, or DVD recorder or PC with video card? I need to work on the videos in any case s.PC, but always drag the calculator is synonymous hindrance, there are other methods?
Thank you very much
Antwort von frm:
Why do not you just take in HD on and are cutting in retrospect? Everything else but iwrd Qualitative bullshit!
Multi-Camera Editing can indeed make synonymous with hindsight.
Hg
Florian
Antwort von Frank B.:
I give Florian right! A mixer mE makes sense only if a live image to be created, using the projector screen or transferred to the audience. For a live recording does not need a mixer.
To get a proper HD-capable mixer, process the appropriate quality, it needs to invest many thousands. This still expensive peripherals.
Some mixers, especially in the lower price range have only CVBS signal paths. Even if, as in your case (AVM02), Y / C signal processing, there can be problems because many newer HD cameras no Y / C outputs have more on it, at least, the slightly higher-value analog SD -could tap signal. Whether CVBS or Y / C, you lose "at least the quality advantage of HD.
As concert recordings may well succeed is in the forum has been sufficiently discussed. There are a lot of good tips to be found.
Frank
Antwort von DennisP.:
Oh, I forgot to mention that comes with the cameras to record individually, without Bildmsicher nciht into question. Since I have just invested in a projector 500oANSI + mobile 3x4m canvas, as we have seen in each recording to the Live Picture. In addition, the time pressure for the cutting is simply too large, a week later, the people want to have their DVD on the table.
Antwort von Immedia:
1 weeks is indeed more than enough with a postpro including DVD production!
Live recordings I make with a Mobile Studio Datavideo of
Antwort von DennisP.:
What do you think it brings more s.Qualität,
If I bid for a used NV-GS250/500 and stöpsle this quality using an S-video cable s.den AVM02, or if I'll buy me a HF200 and of the AV-out (yellow times from the adapter cable) via RCA or BNC s . go to the mixer?
Can you, for my purpose, recommend any other good used cameras, or are the 3Chipper of Panasonic already recommended?
Antwort von Frank B.:
A Palm PC via Y / C out brings a better quality than an HD camera that outputs in SD via composite. HD is not so in both cases.
In both cases, the quality (in relation to the resolution miserably) to a good HD recording. If s.end but anyway only one DVD is available from the output of the SD mixer, you can save yourself the HD cameras.
But sorry, we wanted to spare you, invest in high-resolution time much money into a dead horse.
Frank
Antwort von frm:
When wilt sell the only thing to invest in a SDi record remains, but then need synonymous cameras that support such SonyEx1 / Ex3. The Fbas signal through a video mixer, I think because of a problem because the quality comes out more VHS!
The cheapest and Quality in BAnd is gone just as I said, Maps and intersect recording the event.
One week, I still think synonymous feasible period.
Hg
Florian
Antwort von thos-berlin:
As far as I know, is to be preferred for longer cable routes to CVBS Y / C.
