Frage von zueriman:
Below lowlight test clips of the "JVC GY-HM100" and the "SonyPMW-EX3. I think this Comparison leaves no questions unanswered terms Leistnungen lowlight:
The SonyEX3 the JVC can look like very old camera. By the way: The lowlight performance of the big sister of the HM100, HM700 to be only marginally better. I think that overlooks Sonyklar has to do with the fact that plug into the 1/2-inch chips EX3, whereas the HM700 only 1/3-inch and HM100 have installed only 1 / 4 inch. There are obviously physical limits at the moment!
Conclusion of Tesclips:
- The Sony EX3 brings synonymous (without Gainverstärkung; 0db) excellent lowlight resultative. It produces massive brighter and brighter images than the HM100 with +9 dB gain!
- If you are still in the EX3 gain, the noise is less massive than the pumped up HM100.
Observed when the clips especially the s.Anfang Comparison of the Interior and the Garden s.Schluss? Got questions? I do not think :-).
Here are the test clips. The first clip shows the whole row (in HD quality, HD-bottom press and) go to fullscreen. The second clip shows the Comparison simultaneously in one window. Here the difference is particularly obvious.
First clip = Clipserie in HD:
Second clip = multicam view:
WARNING: The clips are in None manner subsequently manipulated. I have taken them as they came out of the camera!
Antwort von Ruebe:
hallo erstmal
And where is the comparative of sense?
one 8000, - camcorders with a 3000 - compared to camcorders?
it would be somehow unfair if the result would not be?
I'm certainly with the jvc hm 100 very satisfied and it can only recommend.
gruss
rueber
Antwort von gunman:
hallo erstmal
And where is the comparative of sense?
one 8000, - camcorders with a 3000 - compared to camcorders?
it would be somehow unfair if the result would not be?
I'm certainly with the jvc hm 100 very satisfied and it can only recommend.
gruss
rueber </ span>
Well, and I ALSO
Gunman
Antwort von ed-media:
Everyone must stop him to find happiness making camera, the egg Wollmilchsau is all a dream. From the processing of the haptics and the HM100 is clearly better for the EX3 me the wobbly on / off switch
disrupted the fragile process of the viewfinder, is the many already canceled.
A EX3 with a HM100 is once again compare apples with pears
compare, instead of the HM700 could be synonymous with the EX3 the HPX301
to compare because both have CMOS (and if synonymous, the HPX301) 1 / 3 "chips.
And, rolling shutter, flash problems and distorted images due to the
Do not forget in RS CMOS. I know there ugly pictures
of racing and things that are built for speed.
Comparison to the times when dvinfo.net look, there are many JVC lovers.
Antwort von zueriman:
That's not comparing apples with pears, for the lowlight performance of the big sister of the HM100, HM700 to be only marginally better. And the HM700 is the direct competitor of the EX3! That in my test no clips of the HM700 can be seen, has to do with the fact that I work with Windows and the Quicktime format, the HM700 can not read.
I think that overlooks Sonyklar has to do with the fact that plug into the 1/2-inch chips EX3, whereas the HM700 only 1/3-inch and HM100 have installed only 1 / 4 inch. There are obviously physical limits at the moment!
Antwort von pailes:
I think that overlooks Sonyklar has to do with the fact that plug into the 1/2-inch chips EX3, whereas the HM700 only 1/3-inch and HM100 have installed only 1 / 4 inch. There are obviously physical limits at the moment! And CMOS vs. CCD
Antwort von deti:
So I would be ¬ 3000 for a camera like the JVC GY-HM100 simply too much when you think about what make consumer cameras for 600 ¬. Ultimately, you can still see very well about the lack of professional functions of time and still make very good shots with a consumer camera.
Who really wants to play in the professional league, because he functions and the quality of professional equipment is needed, should not skimp synonymous and equal access to a camera s.8k ¬ upwards.
For me, at least JVC GY-HM100 and 700 and neither one thing nor another, but rather an ambitious amateurs attempting to convey a professional sense.
Deti
Antwort von domain:
For me, at least JVC GY-HM100 and 700 and neither one thing nor another, but rather an ambitious amateurs attempting to convey a professional sense.
Because what is truth to it, however, two features are quite interesting: first, the easily worked EX format, and secondly, the possibilities to influence the gamma.
However, I have slight doubts about whether the most convincing way possible. The previous test videos show my opinion that is still somewhat deficient in tracing the lights, they generally burn out too fast for my taste.
Antwort von gunman:
So s.Deti and domain
You're certainly not "amateurs"! If you think you are "J
VC with an alleged attempt by HM 100 amtitionierten amateurs mediate a pro-feeling" I can live with your thoughts, but when I look at what you look for "ordinary Consumercams criticize," then you are Do not be consistent!!
Now go out once a company and tries to stamp out large parts of your criticisms in a new cam, then it is acceptable to you, again not synonymous.
I repeat: The HM 100 is not a panacea, it is not synonymous cheap, there is not only light but synonymous shadow, BUT at the moment there is nothing comparable on the market! That's just a fact, you should accept as synonymous to "professionals".
Gunman
Antwort von pailes:
I repeat: The HM 100 is not a panacea, it is not synonymous cheap, there is not only light but synonymous shadow, BUT at the moment there is nothing comparable on the market! Oh yes, there's it. Depends what you value s.auf lay.
Antwort von gunman:
I repeat: The HM 100 is not a panacea, it is not synonymous cheap, there is not only light but synonymous shadow, BUT at the moment there is nothing comparable on the market!
Oh yes, there's it. Depends what you value s.auf lay. OK, then give butter over the fish and name names and benefits.
Gunman
Antwort von pailes:
OK, then give butter over the fish and name names and benefits.
Gunman I have the Panasonic AG-HMC151E, which also records to SDHC cards. The camera is indeed greater than the HM-100 but it still only weighs 300g more. She also plays in the same price range, may therefore be of even compare.
Antwort von gunman:
OK, then give butter over the fish and name names and benefits.
Gunman
I have the Panasonic AG-HMC151E, which also records to SDHC cards. The camera is indeed greater than the HM-100 but it still only weighs 300g more. She also plays in the same price range, may therefore be of even compare. OK, I agree, you can compare the cameras.
Panasonic Pro: larger wide angle - and 1 / 3 inch chips. They are not to be underestimated features.
Cons: No XLR - bigger - (AVCHD format; s.sich not a disadvantage, but the processing of mp4 files respectively. Quicktime does not seem so problematic) the price is specified with ¬ 4,350, but I do not what the street price. The HM 100 I bought for 3250 euros with VAT included.
I hope we are both happy with (the cameras, I am) on its way.
Gunman
Antwort von Manuell:
Hi,
Of course the Panasonic XLR inputs and street price is synonymous is that of the JVC, so for me these are strong competitors.
mfg
Manuel
Antwort von gunman:
Hi,
Of course the Panasonic XLR inputs and street price is synonymous is that of the JVC, so for me these are strong competitors.
mfg
Manuel Then Sorry for the XLR inputs
Gunman
Antwort von pailes:
I hope we are both happy with (the cameras, I am) on its way.
Gunman Sure, I did not want you to make your cam synonymous worm, but only to point out that there are already alternatives. In size to reach the HM-100 is still very attractive, unfortunately, tells me this picture is not so much, I recognize the Example CA's strength, which I find rather sad.
Panasonic will be in August / September, of a smaller comparable camcorder out (; HMC-41E), however, based on CMOS chips. It remains exciting.
