Frage von Harti:
Hi,
because I have encountered only on Article I, AS a camera movement is created, I would like time to ask if I ever allowed (free).
I have google earth in those times an e-mail support, but I was the only provision on their license page skillfully.
From there I can make an application, a google-mark to be used in 2-4 weeks will be.
I do not know whether this claim at all for me, because I just want to ride on a camera to film for my school, a kind of film, the s.Tag shown the door open and distributed free of charge.
Vllt someone has already done this experience.
Thank you very much
Antwort von otnemem:
I MUST have a Google Earth video use? no
Antwort von otnemem:
A few notes would help
Antwort von otnemem:
A few notes would help Pardon. Question answered. Remarks change but nothing s.der fact. ;)
Antwort von otnemem:
Google can give you the rights that are not synonymous, since google only synonymous operates the portal. Once you want to publish the pictures, synonymous charge, you will need the consent of the Uhrhebers. That would be in your case, NASA, ESA or other companies.
Antwort von otnemem:
This is in the wrong form.
1. A large part of the recordings BELONGS Google. With their accumulated money to buy companies they are busy on the satellite and aerial record. For example, the aerial photographs of Switzerland owned by a Google subsidiary. For other countries, I know the exact details are not. "We operate only the portal" is a fairy tale, what easier than Google "but we are the good guys" can stand.
2. For NASA recordings need not be licensed, the Landsat images are public domain, such as virtually everything in the U.S. with tax money will be funded.
3. Of course, Google does not want that stuff for free easy use, because ultimately it is about them, to earn money!
Incidentally contains (with $ 400 per year is not exactly cheap) Professional version even a video module, which is exactly the purpose is there to export videos.
Conclusion: Google does not want it mitd videos free version will be produced and will therefore probably not approve. Whether, however, where a school for anyone interested in film, is another question. While not just appear on the Internet, they are likely to take care of someone so little.
As an alternative you can use WorldWine synonymous NASA. The hold is not as detailed aerial photographs, all photographs are definitely free to use.
Antwort von sonjas:
The question was and is
I MUST have a Google Earth video use? and the answer can only mean
NO. he may not.
Antwort von Harti:
So I can save the query so.
I will be me that NASA look tool. Maybe it does indeed synonymous.
Greeting
Harti
Antwort von fenom:
In "Crank" synonymous but have used Google Earth;)
Antwort von derpianoman:
Thanks for the comments - I was interested synonymous.
This forum is not affiliated with the Bundeswehr,
where the shortest possible answers are good.
Understood, my dear "guest"?
(Answer only "Yes" or "No")
Antwort von PowerMac:
Closed questions are just so logical s.sich that only with "yes" or "no" reply. Where is the problem?
Antwort von derpianoman:
There is no problem.
Antwort von chmee:
The "guest" has quite rightly given for Lau NO!
There is the large version, and so must the material be used synonymous. Ultimately deserves googlebooks 2x. Once s.der
Payment and Second s.der allocated advertising space in the movie.
mfg chmee
Antwort von steveb:
What should the people?
But someone here has a problem and it is but not the exact answer to the question, but a problem-solving.
I would just about make a head and the recording and embed it. Who should be in a non-commercial matter (like your) make it a problem.
Google is not the Gema :-)
Antwort von derpianoman:
... But someone here has a problem and it is but not the exact answer to the question, but a problem-solving ... Of course, but the issue has unfortunately synonymous admitted someone
short and concise "cleared" and a "NO" s.den head explode.
That's very unkind across not everyone here understands.
And it also has not helped synonymous.
Antwort von Tuffy:
http://videocopilot.net/videotutorials/earthzoom/index.htmVielleicht hilft dir das.
Bei den "Comments" steht mehr dazu, wo du das Material her kriegst.
Antwort von PeterM:
404ERR
Antwort von PeterM:
@ Tuffy
Super contribution. Such contributions make this forum is still worth reading, despite the know-.
Thank you
Antwort von AndyZZ:
The question impleziert eigendlich but can I charge and if no conditions under which it in turn implies that and that's the question "does anybody have experience with this" yes, the OP is waiting for a response of Google, and will hopefully post here then synonymous.
This whole talk about imply etc very often leads to complete misunderstanding. Ultimately, the questioner is responsible for what the wanted understands or should understand. I can not misunderstand it, ER is expressed from misleading.
None of us has a crystal ball omniscient. A properly asked question is a prerequisite for a proper response. It must be the questioner in mind.
Something schwmmig it will be when it comes to the creation of commercial videos in higher resolution sub circumvent Google's movie makers. We used the videos (but they are so synonymous in the Asian region) on the basis Prolizenz.
That sounds a bit now so, like with us in the Asian region as eh stolen, copied, forged, no copyright to be taken, because no one can follow, as the governments of these countries tolerate or encourage (of its own economy due).
But I'm pretty sure you meant it did not, but it refers to the possibility of regionally differing licensing conditions indicates wanted.
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) That formal logical answer may indeed be true but not exactly evidence of exceptional flexibility in thought. (...) A risky proposition. So you close of an answer that for you only the aspect of form aufweist fidelity to a rigidity in thinking? Ever thought that such a response synonymous other intentions as the fulfillment of logic can give? For example, a questioner challenge precisely to write? Him to recognize that its closed questions are not relevant?
Antwort von Tuffy:
@ Tuffy
Super contribution. Such contributions make this forum is still worth reading, despite the know-.
Thank you But not.
There is so happy if you can help, now it is only the question whether he has After Effects: /
Antwort von steveb:
(...) That formal logical answer may indeed be true but not exactly evidence of exceptional flexibility in thought. (...)
A risky proposition. So you close of an answer that for you only the aspect of form aufweist fidelity to a rigidity in thinking? Ever thought that such a response synonymous other intentions as the fulfillment of logic can give? For example, a questioner challenge precisely to write? Him to recognize that its closed questions are not relevant? In this case, but not applicable! Question but was clearly formulated and well ...
Antwort von PeterM:
@ AndyZZ
So, it was synonymous meant. Here in SH is a part of China Goggle teams.
We have simply asked. In our case this means that we have Prolizenz and, where appropriate, our customer synonymous one, for example, if the software is in the museum eingestzt.
I binmir but not sure, and I wanted to express whether you everywhere with this simple model without legal license Gauzonen work.
You can go in with the prolizenz commercial googleeignen videos with the video module build and you can get high-resolution frames synonymous spend and save. This may be legally synonymous as commercial verwqendet be. What I was not entirely clear whether you have 4800 frames with this then synonymous any data / movies can build. I honestly am not a complete Eula views. I liked it enough to say here that it is OK, knowing the most überhaubt if you are happy with official licenses works.
@ Powermac
I consider such a question, or a thread is not acting as educators umbedingt action for students, but rather as synonymous lodging an interesting topic in more depth, especially at least for me the kind of problem with the precise description of something else implied.
Antwort von Harti:
Hi,
Once I am very pleased that the issue is so hotly debated, however, refers to either half of the contributions to my question or the (allegedly resulting) really is not relevant answers.
Ever thought that such a response synonymous other intentions as the fulfillment of logic can give? For example, a questioner challenge precisely to write? Him to recognize that its closed questions are not relevant? Perhaps the questioner intends synonymous yes his problem in a concise, short title to express ...
So I have a letter of approval test and will be posted once the answer then post here (synonymous if it will last long).
The video of Andrew Kramer's really helpful if synonymous very complicated. I believe I will one way or the similar make (with free pictures of NASA when they are free ^ ^ or else her ...), if Google cancels.
The Pro version, I buy in any case, but if you still synonymous with their equal right to receive further processing, making, at least for companies (in some countries) sense.
Regards,
Harti
Antwort von derpianoman:
HI!
This joke here shows how important quick, correct answers are! ;-)
Thick fog.
A small U.S. plane has dissipated. The pilot revolves around the top floor of an office building, inspired by the pilot from the cockpit and roars through an open window: "Where are we?"
A man looks back on his PC of: "In an airplane!" The pilot turns a sharp curve and landed 5 minutes later with the last drop of fuel at the airport of Seattle. The bewildered passengers want to know how the pilot managed to have to orientate themselves.
"Quite simply," says the pilot. "The answer to my question was short, accurate and totally useless. I was also with the Microsoft hotline spoken. The Microsoft Building is located 5 miles from the Seattle airport, course 87 degrees."
