Frage von Wotan:
Hello!
I would like to propose a possible choice s.allen available MPEG encoder growth. The problem is that it is difficult to come out who ever manufactures all its own encoder. zb I Elecard and MainConcept bought but actually of the same source seems to come; Proppage only looks different but they both produce the same verhunzten headers.
So following a Manufacturer DirectShow encoder are known to me:
Elecard / MainConcept / Moonlight (all the same)
Pinnacle
Nanocosmos
FFMpeg
TMPEGEnc (which presumably uses FFMpeg?)
Matrox is indeed only the hardware encoder is not on direct appeal can show ...
Do you have other Manufacturer? - Which brand of Nero Encoder is I do not know, but hardly an original production, eh?
lg, harry
Antwort von der henne:
Nero should synonymous MainConcept use. The Cinema Craft Encoder, you have forgotten, I think that is synonymous an in-house development and is a pretty good one.
Antwort von WoWu:
Harry,
You understand what constitutes a "verhunzten header"?
The tables and their contents are all set of MPEG ... but I must give you right when I s.das disaster for the Signaling
Aspect Ratio think it may be the correct term, but because the companies can not.
Antwort von weitwinkel:
what is with the procoder of grass valley?
http://desktop.thomsongrassvalley.com/products/ProCoderSW/index.php?lang=DE
'm satisfied so far ...
gruß cj
Antwort von Wotan:
Harry,
You understand what constitutes a "verhunzten header"?
The tables and their contents are all set of MPEG ... but I must give you right when I s.das disaster for the Signaling Aspect Ratio think it may be the correct term, but because the companies can not. Hi!
Sorry that I have for so long was not there ... Thank you in advance for the tips, both sound very interesting!
qWoWu: as I get my results from the Mercury MPEG PS tester see below. As far as I'm still synonymous aback makes is that the VLC usually has no video again if I ne or MainConcept Elecard File reflected. Other MPEG Analysis Tools synonymous tell me that the VBV buffer is not as beautiful as in a of Avid Liquid produced equivalent MPEG2.
Normally I use the MainConcept Multiplexer, but the results are always the same, no preference which I write the file or multiplex.
The standards are in MPEG2 is not very enlightening because very many suggestions but very little real guidance in the SMPTE standards are indicated. Blame such as "you create no-standard MPEG" or "you can not handle MPEG standard" is hardly possible in the professional field because there is no real standard for the very advanced settings such as VBV and co. There.
Mercury Test:
SCR ANALYSIS:
SCR - item # 2 -> first byte of pack delivered to STD before last byte of previous pack
.
.
SCR - item # 1066 -> first byte of pack delivered to STD before last byte of previous pack
PTS / DTS ANALYSIS:
PTS - item # 1 (PES # 192) -> the value is before the time arrived
.
.
PTS - item # 76 (PES # 192) -> the value is before the time arrived
PTS - item # 55 (PES # 224) -> PTS is arrived before the time of a complete access unit
.
.
PTS - item # 428 (PES # 224) -> the value is before the time arrived
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Cassiopeia
thanks for the reply ...
.... I can now understand and can understand what you mean.
I am confident, however, what the new codecs are concerned, because even during the time the MPEG2 MPEC Committees in ISO / IEC obviously tried to manage and audit all possible to have published.
Only has no firm to hold (keep), because new implementations can no longer compatible with their old scrap would have been ... when they really could not, because if every second sentence is "a certain degree of tolerance" ... reads, can not work .... But, as I said, the new papers are accurate. It has been synonymous with MPEG MPEG1 has not ceased to learn.
Perhaps an addendum to the (missing) Directive.
A replacement for this is the reference implementation, the way it was lucky for MPEG, unlike many other codecs and gives a conformity to the standard cost. To that extent, you are already compliant and non-compliant implementations are different and in the professional world is (better) synonymous to the Manufacturer, otherwise it will not conform their products will soon no longer can sell.
But we hope that everything will be better. I am confident.
best greetings
Antwort von motiongroup:
http://www.cinegy.com/jml/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=52
as an option and compared with analysis tool
Antwort von Wotan:
Hui ... this is a brand new, thanks! I am amazed that you can google for days and never reaching sowas. Maybe I am too much on google German ;-)
@ Wowu: This is the ingenious s.diesem forum, where else people meet to plan and simply NEN ne views on digital video have!
Exactly what you say is the reason why I have everything possible available to MPEG2 wants growth. It seems synonymous, because that MPEG4 is usually unproblematic. This shows what MPEG has learned (or that I am far too little had to do ;-))
However, I am not as confident as you regarding the new format is concerned .... MXF OP-else, XDCAM, OMFI, MKV, MOV, AVI, Elementary Stream; MPEG1 to 4, DV, Uncompressed, DivX, JPEG2000, AVHC ... Such words make me more skeptical about the future is concerned.
lg, harry
Antwort von WoWu:
Harry, I know what you mean and quite "carefree" look of course I do not synonymous in the future, because there are always companies who think with their own developments, the thick license cost to be able to deliver .... but it is a matter of time.
For me, it is mainly the fact that since the "composite" re-times a procedure is applied, the (as then) of the consumer camcorder and a wide application area-on the chip industry, the broadcaster, to broadcast and back again to the TV reaches the consumer and that it is (for once) a process in which sufficient developmental work is incorporated, because no application of pressure such as MPEG2 stand behind.
And because MPEG2 synonymous for the last developer now has become unattractive to look at the little resources other than the new procedures will address.
At least if the American market in the broadcasting of HD MPEG2 spacing of notes, (and the notes to s.Geschwindigkeit) because no more Channel 20 Mbit / s per HD channel can make the acquisition is synonymous to a compatible signal alignment .
Also, the shipping container will be based on a limited quantity s.File formats collapse because compatibility is now synonymous for the consumer no longer a stranger.
Let us together. I'm happy about your contribution.
