Could you please explain to me why a Mac for image editing is better than Windows? Tell me just in general the time difference.
In the search I found nothing about it.
Antwort von Axel:
In a direct Comparison of the workflow is similar, where do you use for PC Programs Adobe Photoshop, Premiere, Encore and After Effects. That would also be for Mac Photoshop, Final Cut, DVD Studio Pro and After Effects too. Crashes should be rare for Mac, or very unlikely. But that is probably because, as you managing users in your Windows system. With Mac's just in this combination, the integration of car perfectly, and any additional programs are practically not needed (unless thou shalt Avi Files Edit). There is also in the "Production Suite" Motion, Live Type and Soundtrack, which work seamlessly from Final Cut out. For very complex comps with mass CGN-effects there are for Mac Shake, which in turn is perfectly integrated into the work area. More generally, it works its way more comfortable, not because the hardware is faster (which is relative and therefore probably is not true) but because the operating system is designed for easy access and less on the management of file structures. Windows: Office, Administration. Apple: Media Design.
Antwort von Wiro:
Well, if "for image editing, a Mac is better than Windows' time is uncertain. I have professionally done with Windows and Apple's graphic designers have had to - if anyone knows his profession today, there's no difference (more).
It's true - at the start of the graphical interface was the MAC in terms of graphics, 3D, Music and Video are favorites, while Windows really be more dedicated to the office software. Not for nothing is said, Bill Gates had Steve Jobs stole the ideas piece by piece :-)))
Inveterate Mac users are so often feel that nothing s.ihren Apple get it - but right now it no longer. Even when viewed in the graphics industry, the Mac still seen as the real thing, because prof. Designers have just learned to always on the Mac. And the entire graphics industry including printing and everything that is related to just remain on Apple format specified. Greeting Wiro
Antwort von silentzero:
Since I thank you very times.
Antwort von PowerMac:
It is not a matter of whether Grafibearbeitung Windows does not go or is inefficient. You can do everything the same on Windows, just get to the goal. On the Mac, it is easier and simpler.
One does not need a Mac, you have but one, he was never a restore. For me it is simply much more pleasant.
Antwort von Hogar:
This is already bordering s.Glaubensfragen everything. I could say the same synonymous from the PC, because I will convert it in no way synonymous to a Mac, because for me it nunmal easier and easier with the PC reach its destination.
We must have tried both, to assess the actual for themselves. PC users will always sell you better than a PC and MAC users you will always sell better than a MAC.
And since I'm a PC user, here is an argument against the MAC: MAC is expensive. ;)
Oh yes: If you wait a bit, you can designate an OSX version synonymous you get somewhere, running on the PC. I know someone who did something like now on his laptop, but has since synonymous know much about;)
Hogar
Antwort von PowerMac:
"Hogar" wrote:
PC users will always sell you better than a PC and MAC users you will always sell better than a MAC.
How many people do you know who are really satisfied with Windows?
Antwort von pergamon:
give my speakers as only partly right. a matter of faith like the choice of hardware might be, but the individual software differ in their handling quite properly from each other-a mainly operating systems. selbt you need to try what you appear s.intuitivsten.
that macs are more expensive than pcs so true anymore. for a dual-dual-core athlon you pay for boxx technology more than 7,000 dollars - a brand new comparable dual-dual core mac there are cheaper around the half ...
... s. below and end of the flagpole is the mac-mini, for a brief 500 euros (for imovie) quite useful.
the pergamon
Antwort von Hogar:
"PowerMac" wrote:
How many people do you know who are really satisfied with Windows?
Oh, please ...
I know more satisfied Mac users than PC users. I even know some people who have switched from Mac to PC and then were more satisfied than before. And you can - without any doubt - just as easily reverse of the Mac say Page. That is the phenomenon of opinion forming groups. Everyone knows more in his environment.
But that is synonymous totally irrelevant. If you want to see more-and minorities, then do better, a survey, because everyone can claim on his page, he knows another 20 people, all of which are his opinion. But once approved, effective on a poll will actually get out a representative result, if there is a system which is preferably of a clear majority, then one can still argue contra majority opinion Professional opinion. ( "People who devour Schei $ e, millions of flies can not be wrong!")
Ok, this is a Mac generally more expensive, I'll take back again. But to be honest people are: Mac and PC two such complex systems, with which you can do countless things that it is impossible to regard A system as generally better. For every purpose there is the right one. And depending on what you do and how you do it, is perhaps a Mac or a PC just better for you.
Perhaps the decision between Mac and PC not a religious issue but rather a question of the use, but the debate about which system is generally better for now, like in any case, a religious discussion.
Hogar
Antwort von Chris2:
I look to see how prior to the Windows PC clear advantages:
favorably
-more modular in hardware (components can be used to upgrade and are pleased to share that the market is huge, there is always synonymous Inovation and the collapse of prices ensures that new purchases are synonymous realistic and are not pure wishful thinking)
-high flexibility in terms of commercial software (there are not only more software for Windows and Mac but availability is on packages that are offered for both PC and MAC is often synonymous faster) synonymous with the Windows versions
-there are many freeware / open source / shareware / third-party software that is Windows only (witness the s.Virtual Dub + Avisynth filter and the large community for these open source projects, or Google's great, free image archive - Program PICASA)
-The Choice of several video-systems (Video for Windows (VfW), DirectShow, QuickTime) and, thus, indirectly related to the various container formats (AVI, MPEG, WMV, QT). Everyone gets their benefits, Macken, disadvantages. But its limited to Quicktime (so good it is synonymous), I found bad in any case.
-the standard one-button mouse of Apple has always been and still is and will always be synonymous of ALLGERGRÖßTE MIST! ! ! I (I'll never, ever again again s.einen Mac if I did not share my own, three-button scroll USB mouse did it!)
Antwort von Millpesetas:
"Chris2" wrote:
I look to see how prior to the Windows PC clear advantages: more modular in hardware (components can be exchanged freely and upgrading, the market is enormous, there are always synonymous Inovation and the collapse of prices ensures that new purchases synonymous realistic and are not pure wishful thinking) are
-high flexibility in terms of commercial software (there are not only more software for Windows and Mac but availability is on packages that are offered for both PC and MAC is often synonymous faster) synonymous with the Windows versions
-there are many freeware / open source / shareware / third-party software that is Windows only (witness the s.Virtual Dub + Avisynth filter and the large community for these open source projects, or Google's great, free image archive - Program PICASA)
-The Choice of several video-systems (Video for Windows (VfW), DirectShow, QuickTime) and, thus, indirectly related to the various container formats (AVI, MPEG, WMV, QT). Everyone gets their benefits, Macken, disadvantages. But its limited to Quicktime (so good it is synonymous), I found bad in any case.
-the standard one-button mouse of Apple has always been and still is and will always be synonymous of ALLGERGRÖßTE MIST! ! ! I (I'll never, ever again again s.einen Mac if I did not share my own, three-button scroll USB mouse did it!)
In reply to Chris and perhaps finally mooring the essential difference between the two systems:
Yes, the media was making with PCs, and will be a constant struggle zickt the configuration of the workplace with new hardware - modules, codec updates, work s.der fitting of new components and of troubleshooting when the system. 90% of the posts of this forum with the 1001 names of various tools and codecs prove impressive. Mac users are due to the compactness of its system certainly less resourceful in an exotic format compatibility issues as they come without any major trouble to the same Results.
Yes, the account funding can be provided to bring PCs to similar benefits as macs. If it is not to be very costly trial and error, is detailed advice and studying many, many magazines and websites announced. If the system is bought up and configured for operation similar to the job a funny wired Frankenstein lab, and in the meantime, it's time to retrofit one or the other component ...
Yes, contributions such as this have always smacks of ridiculous controversy, as in a medieval religious war. Whose brilliant slogan, it was synonymous "The problem usually sits 50 cm in front of the Calculator": The hit the mark. What matters is how we deal with the computers themselves, which we achieve them. There is nothing good, unless you do it!
Yes, mice should not only button one, this thing I never understood why people have so synonymous not only an erogenous zone.
No, I'm not a Mac fanatic. I have many friends who are film-fanatic (like me) and also computer geeks (like me) does not. Each of which could be put together for me, tomorrow a working PC system, with which I am happy the way I'm satisfied with Apple today.
Antwort von PowerMac:
There are no more single-button mouse from Apple!
Only three-button Mighty Mouse.
Antwort von Chris2:
"Anonymous" wrote:
Yes, the account funding can be provided to bring PCs to similar benefits as macs.
Erm ... do you want to say that a PowerMac is CHEAPER than a comparably equipped PC? For PCs, there are s.kostengünstigen such a large choice, high-performance components (keyword: s.Markt be competing rather than angewießen a monopoly. Even with the choice of your CPU, you can choose between at least two major players who are constantly fighting in the price) so that I can see this fact rather the opposite: For the price one PowerMacs you can take in the PC world really screw together a true luxury machine.
Quote:
If it is not to be very costly trial and error, is detailed advice and studying many, many magazines and websites announced [...]
Also on the PC market, there are some high quality synonymous "FullService" providers such as Apple. Dell is here as a good place if you want to have a functioning, powerful PC, where you have to worry about anything. Although priced (like Apple), somewhat expensive, but you get really optimized systems that are delivered ready to go home. Neither price nor quality of Apple's far away. But we happen to have a different system - with the above-mentioned advantages.
Quote:
And in the meantime, it is already time to retrofit one or the other component ...
How many weeks and months because there is a new Mac site is available in its cool design packaging at the Apple Store? Six months or nine months until the next model comes out? Sowas's (if not exactly when you buy electronics discount stores) is not in PCs.
Antwort von Axel:
"Chris2" wrote:
How many weeks and months because there is a new Mac site is available in its cool design packaging at the Apple Store? Six months or nine months until the next model comes out? Sowas's (if not exactly when you buy electronics discount stores) is not in PCs.
Maybe. In ebay you will find out quickly that the depreciation can not be ignored in both systems. A question of assessment: one is annoyed because his property as quickly outdated and in computers it is hardly vintage lovers, the other looking forward selling of new developments and needed to stay up to date. That is just like leasing. And how long can you upgrade a PC system, without at some point to have the feeling of sitting on a pile of electronic waste that is not more rundläuft really?
Antwort von jens:
Witzig. This thread has just taken the course, which was expected see at the beginning of ... Chocolate or vanilla? That is the question! ;-) Jens (Both quenches my desire for sweets - and yes, tastes good both synonymous ;-)
Antwort von Thore Rehbach:
One can say synonymous: one who has the advantage, who knows both worlds and they can serve:)
Antwort von Chris2:
"jens" wrote:
Witzig. This thread has just taken the course, which was expected see at the beginning of ...
It was so still not even alluded to perform in the future, an Intel-processor Macs synonymous its work :-)
Antwort von Axel:
"Chris2" wrote:
It was so still not even alluded to perform in the future, an Intel-processor Macs synonymous its work :-)
When Porsche engines in a Volkswagen plant would be built - and na?
Antwort von Hogar:
"Chris2" wrote:
"jens" wrote:
Witzig. This thread has just taken the course, which was expected see at the beginning of ...
It was so still not even alluded to perform in the future, an Intel-processor Macs synonymous its work :-)
Oh yes, I played on it:
See next up:
"Oh yes, if you wait a bit, can you fix an OSX version synonymous get somewhere, running on the PC. I know someone who did something like now on his laptop, but who has synonymous know much about;)"
Hogar
Antwort von Pablito:
One problem with this discussion is that, having worked for most PC users never s.einem Mac, but have worked very hard with most Mac users PCs. I only recommend it to make a comparative opinion on Macs or PCs when one has performed extensively with both systems! For my part, it's like I'm too stupid to set up a Windows PC so that he is stable and makes me long to do my work, especially if he hangs s.Internet. No question that certainly can, but I can not. Therefore I use a Mac because I deal with nothing other than the work to be done.
Gruss Chris
Antwort von Hogar:
"Anonymous" wrote:
One problem with this discussion is that, having worked for most PC users never s.einem Mac, but have worked very hard with most Mac users PCs.
If this is a guess, you should not formulate it as fact. I hardly think so synonymous that if you are too stupid or too lazy. I think a Mac has its See the full permission if you do not need "complicated diversity. IMHO Mac is a rather "simple clarity" as "complicated diversity", and therefore both systems have their merits. Depending on your needs.
