Frage von vertov99:
sorry, something stupid newbie question, although I never quite lengthy search found:
mini-DV camcorder so characterized in the same resolution, which are synonymous dvds. makes the HD quality only at high jump screens, screens, etc., etc. with hddvd as medium or synonymous noticeable during normal tv and dvd player, where such an even number of pixels is not needed?
Antwort von Martin:
makes the HD quality only at high jump screens, screens, etc., etc. with hddvd as medium or synonymous noticeable during normal tv and dvd player, where such an even number of pixels is not needed? Hm, this is not other than the question in the subject ;-)
First, on the DVD as a medium: It makes sense that there is inzwoschen player, the MPEG4 in HD can play.
For "normal" TV and DVD player: No, because there is no quality to see the possibilities of the DVD player and TV exceeds ...
Greeting
Martin
Antwort von vertov99:
"My concern really make sense?" ;-)
what I said slightly confused art, was: as long as I am only on my recordings and burn dvd on a hd-tv-unready "is able ranges 720 * 576-mini-dv resolution technically completely? Various people claimed as their high-definition recordings would still synonymous runter expected better look ...
Antwort von HeikoS:
Do they synonymous. The reason is simply that the recording standard for a long time nothing about the actual figure achieved performance of the host system is specified. Even Consumercams good as the Panasonics DVX100 or PD170 irritate the theoretically achievable resolution is not enough.
This is blatantly obvious when you look at photographs Comparison with a professional shoulder camera watches.
HD images of a good HD camcorder, however, to what the impression of sharpness is concerned, in accordance with sub-accounts of high-Mr subjectively good professional s.eine SD Camera approached.
Antwort von beiti:
The sharpness of runter calculated HDV recordings can be better than that of the original DV recordings - depending on with what DV camcorder it compares. The reason is simply that many DV camcorders the ability of 720 x 576 pixels is not fully exploited. You just need to grab still images from different times DV camcorders watch to see that because in terms of detail resolution even more it would be.
The most recently published 3Chip DV camcorder to the upper price range (SonyVX 2100, Canon XL2) are quite close s.Machbaren; there can runterskalierte HDVs only to sharpen his nuances. Comparison to affordable DV camcorders can be a HDV camcorder to DVD but Resolutionsichtbare-point advantage.
Here is a frame from an entry-DV camcorder. These pictures are on a 70er tube monitor crack still sharp, but here s.Computer or on a large plasma you can see the gaps. Picture that the downscaled from a HDV Cam despite similar technical resolution may look better, is obvious.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
... Go down the computation as soon as I leave the capturing of camera (FX1) it when I was in IT would like to have. This is the result - my subjective impression - better than Pinnacle Studio if that's done (it's faster overall course synonymous yet).
Unfortunately, my previous camera Einchipper and thus the quality is not really comparable, there are worlds between.
BG
Andreas
Antwort von HeikoS:
@ beiti
in one, I must contradict you: The Images of a VX2100 / XL2 is far from s.der boundary of the feasible. Da geht noch einiges.
