Frage von Ronsker:
I would soon have a new camcorder. There is much to (holidays, weddings, children pp.).
Previously I had a HDD camcorder stiffened.
Reason: quick transfer to the PC, ultimately, no quality loss
Had the JVC MG 130 on the Test and was the picture of the pretty disappointed. Both the recording directly s.TV (Panasonic 42Zoll plasma), as synonymous on the burned DVD. In addition, these nerves at JVC MOD problem (images are considered special format MPEG-MOD saved). A change in the most cutting programs is not readily available. Camcorders So went back.
Now I ask whether it is the SonyDSR SR-32 or 52, should ...
But have no idea in what format the recordings SONY stores and whether those with Ulead and Co. as simple can be processed.
In addition to the speed of transfer to the calculator is synonymous to me of course the quality of the recording s.Ende on the DVD (as it should be s.Ende) very (!) Is important.
MiniDV yes Here comes into play here because the quality due to smaller compression should be better. Only When I got out of the AVI after capturing in the finishing to DVD MPEG eeeh again ne draus do, then the quality of MiniDV advantage then. Or not?
Are of the AVI to MPEG (DVD) rendered images are not as good or bad, as recorded on HDD MPEG data?
Finally, exactly like this depend on my purchase.
SonyDCR SR 32/52, or maybe ne MiniDV (Panasonic GM NS 320 )????
Can someone then I still recommend the current video editing program? Video Studio 9 (Ulead) is no longer as relevant.
So I stand to cool transitions and effects ... :)
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) Here comes into play MiniDV yes, because the quality of smaller Compression should be better. (...) Yes. A recording format but the quality is not enough. The quality is mainly of the electronics of the camera provides. MiniDV is not good or bad, but the camera before!
(...) But: When I made the AVI after capturing in the finishing to DVD MPEG eeeh again ne draus do, then the quality of MiniDV advantage then. Or not? (...) No, nonsense. You have to MEPG the material-2-(bad) of an HDD camera as s.Schluss in other MPEG-2 format. Because it is better you have MiniDV (good) as the initial link.
(...) Are of the AVI to MPEG (DVD) rendered images are not as good or bad, as recorded on HDD MPEG data? (...) No, because you have most of the MPEG-2 again in a more compressed MPEG-2 conversions.
(...) Finally, just like this depend on my purchase.
SonyDCR SR 32/52, or maybe ne MiniDV (Panasonic GM NS 320 )???? (...) I do not know since when you have four question marks need, but the answer is and Panasonic MiniDV.
(...) So I stand to cool transitions and effects ... :) (...) Whether your audience because it is synonymous?
Antwort von UlmsSkyliner:
Such effects will not stop so well s.aber if he wants.
He is probably not about to make professional films or not yet, so he stands on cool effects, like many new to this field, I was initially synonymous so ...
You mean Panasonic NV-GS 320
Antwort von Ronsker:
First, many thanks for the info ...
The statement that is not the format (mpeg, avi ...) the quality of the recording, but the camera, would mean that the HDD cameras would be worse than the MiniDV cameras. I can hardly imagine that you can stand it.
But I seemed so slow but Moch of MiniDV convince to leave, although I was initially actually had to HDD apart.
Yes, I meant Panasonic NV-GS 320th .. thanks for reference to the letters. Perhaps in the excitement happen.
In fact, I am new to the area and I feel nice effects and transitions as a refresher of the sometimes fine otherwise not so exciting-looking home videos.
Did someone ne Recommendation for a program ...?
Antwort von Quadruplex:
The statement that is not the format (mpeg, avi ...) the quality of the recording, but the camera, would mean that the HDD cameras would be worse than the MiniDV cameras. How do you react?
We must at every camcorder distinguish two things: the possibilities and limitations of the recording format (and-medium) and as an actual device works within these limits.
For PAL MiniDV quality is clearly the best format. If you look, for example, the Samsung DV camcorder anschaust, you'll find that the limits of the system hardly ausreizen. Even with the MPEG-2-PAL-based models (whether they are on DVD, hard drive or memory card included), the quality of Optics / image converter and the general course synonymous equipment (and its practicality) of moderate to excellent. Nevertheless, even the principal disadvantage of the data reduction across multiple frames.
Antwort von Daigoro:
Did someone ne Recommendation for a program ...? If thou hast garkeine experience (and a Windows PC), I would first use the Movie Maker.
It is extensive enough for the first steps and you get a first idea of what you ultimately want to do.
Mostly you notice very quickly in the course of the first film, what it lacks and can not be phased bezahltprogramm to ascend.
Then either here again with more detailed specifications or requests one of the many demos to download and try yourself.
Antwort von hannes:
> .... Nice effects and transitions as a refresher of the sometimes fine otherwise not so exciting-looking home videos.
Absolutely correctly recognized.
Just as they are used synonymous, with the success that it's bad video certainly is true as such.
Antwort von Markus:
Here comes into play so MiniDV ... See synonymous:
DV - Data on PC in real time, really?
Antwort von werner76:
Hello,
Actually, probably not even an answer to the question of Ronsker:
"What program?". This was indeed the Movie Maker 2, but then what to convert to DVD (mpg2/AC3). I must note that the original DVDs containing AC3 sound, but UVS8DVD synonymous UFB convert after PCM and that makes some players / media servers (Philips) problems and it's missing the sound.
Question of synonymous to me of what Prog is DV-AVI to DVD is recommended?
Was perhaps already discussed. But what brings the DVD TonCodec with?
MfG
Werner
