Frage von Johel:
I intend to me 'nen zuzulegen camcorder to about 550 ¬, but I can not decide between MiniDV and DVD. I read some in the forum about both formats but I have still ????????
1 Can the DVD SHC-man show in the world or are there limitations as Mini DV (PAL, NTSC, etc)
2-unit which advises her
VDR-D150, Panasonic NV-GS 180 or Panasonic VDR-S D250EG
or is there a better one??
3 - what does it mean: you can edit your videos in the camcorder itself !!!!!
4 - power of the calculator DVD useless??
Thank you
Jay
Antwort von VolkerS:
1. Since the PAL, NTSC, dealing with broadcast formats, with DVD you have the same differences.
2. The second
3. Forget that, that just means that you can insert directly in the camcorder or transitions rausschneiden time a wobbler.
Is cumbersome and usually makes anyone.
4. If you do not want to further process the captured in any way or archive: Yes
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
1) Even with DVD camcorders, there is a difference between PAL and NTSC. The restrictions remain the same.
2) Generally not have a DVD camcorder. Otherwise, I do not dare to give you a Recommendation. Finally, I am not you and therefore do not know what I have for requirements s.das device.
3) This probably means: "Put on your recordings after the event start and end markers, and bring it to a clip of your desired order. In fact, you almost just this possibility of editing, because, with some complicated with tools you can use the Edit recordings with this DVD camcorder is not so easily. And we want this system so can not be said that editing is almost impossible. The disc space is then given away anyway. " So sounds like the advertising slogan for me.
4) The number of Manufacturers want to believe the consumer.
Antwort von Hogar:
And finally:
MiniDV tapes you can probably still play in 20 years. In any case, they will likely keep that long. Whether the format then there is a different question, but I think that there will be. Not least because it is synonymous used in the professional field and can be used for more new content (such as HDV).
When DVD is known about the durability really not that much. Even if, for example Verbatim durability with 30 years indicates, there is no proof that it really is. All I can say only this: My oldest DVD's are about 3 years old and still function. My oldest burned CD is about 8 years old and still works synonymous. I had been synonymous synonymous but Cheap CD's of EMTEC, which faded after 2 years and were no longer readable - not a piece - with no drive.
Magnetic tape, however, were always very long Durable and have worsened in real storage only insignificantly. I have audio tapes, which are aged over 25 years - and you can still watch it. I imagine that still sounds just as in my childhood. That will certainly be similar in miniDV or synonymous better, since there are digital information.
Hogar
Antwort von Sammy:
@ Hogar
just my opinion. Had I not better able to explain. I love MiniDV 's
Regards
Antwort von Voltz:
I'm surprised that nobody has pointed out that apart from the absolutely true statements of previous speakers synonymous still one important advantage of the DV tapes exist, and although the recording format!
In the case of the DV tapes will be recorded in DV-AVI, which can be processed further loss.
DVD camcorders already record for reasons of space already in the compressed MPEG-2 format.
Not all video editing programs dominate the way schneidensolcher frame accurate MPEG files. And even if they can, is frequently observed that we can expect the cut with further problems.
All this can be safely forgotten in DV-AVI recording.
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Only a short time: At a DV-AVI is only in the capture on a PC. On a Mac, it becomes a QuickTime document, so no AVI. It's just a container. But can cause confusion if ever of DV-AVI is spoken, although only the DV format (there are different) means!
And loss, it remains only as long as no changes are made even s.Picture. So Frab-/Helligkeitskorrekturen, transitions, de-interlacer and then next are destructive operations. A non-cut, however, since there is no loss of quality.
When editing in MPEG2 is likely synonymous with the GOP independent cut quality loss.
Antwort von Camy100:
A hint of me, just buy yourself a journal and looking at you once the test results of mini-DV 's and DVD camcorders to. You will see that the DV camcorder consistently get better grades. The reasons have been here already mentioned it anywhere.
Antwort von Gast1:
And loss, it remains only as long as no changes are made even s.Picture. So Frab-/Helligkeitskorrekturen, transitions, de-interlacer and then next are destructive operations. :-) Water to my mill
I think many do not know this and use the filter just because they are there. Especially de-interlace is slowly developing a "fashion trend". It is my opinion for a "normal" SD Hobby filter of the filter useless.
Antwort von Wiro:
... and use the filter just because they are there Do you have to look so well. But since you paid for it must, they are indeed synonymous use ;-)))
Recently, someone called to me:
"You used Premiere Pro. I now have my first Holiday Movie rotated and now I want to grow possibly Premiere Pro to cut. Is it true that Premiere has far too little effects? And the deinterlacer is not synonymous especially its soooo .. .? "
Well, I've recommended him to add itself Premiere NOT better. . .
;-)
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Jan:
Ad 2 What have you got for a Panasonic DVD Player - Supermarket - Sonyoder?
Panasonic first used by the media backed RAM, which can be read at the Pana or other players have views of the RAM is good, because you can save yourself the annoying Finalize (RAM because it's not finaliziert) durability synonymous tip on RAM's is synonymous described in VR mode, so you can cut synonymous in the camera.
But when using a DVD-R / - RW in video mode is nothing other than deleting the whole DVD (- CSE), not even a particular scene, DV editing in the camera with the video mode is not possible, like creating playlists. Yes RAM's can not read many DVD players or computer drives, as soon as one used in Pana, the DVD-RW - are now running multiple functions, the man with a RAM was locked.
If desired cut VDR D 250 would be better because there is an editing software while, at siehts VDR 100 & 150 as badly off. But beware the included SW is used only for a used DVD RAM - no DVD - R / - RW. Although the program synonymous rausreisst nothing big.
And DVD players can play a variety s.günstigen the VR mode has not read at all times, so even with no time is cut in the DVD camera, no preference whether Sony or Canon and Pana.
GS 180 is a good cam - my price / performance winner ¬ 450, although the stability and the low light performance even a trace could be better - then you would a perfect 500 ¬ camera, where you get a 3 chip technology, supplied charger, full manual control, headphone output / microphone input for the Money Today.
GS 280 would be a tip drauflegen - in a few - there are weaknesses, eliminated the 2 ....
3. Exactly as described by surreptitious Michel, scenes can be cut and then cut again Abridged, playlists can be created synonymous - in the whole probably not honestly give a cutting function.
VG
Jan
