Well since there are few special effects that can really ever use one that already allow it.
But it will give people synonymous with special effects can contribute something.
MfG B. DeKid
Antwort von Axel:
Not everyone knows the difference, and therefore it is good that you pointed out.
While special effects can be distinguished easily of Visual Effects, but now hardly ever used the one without the support of others. Special effects are often still need to be enriched with other picture elements or have post-production through various measures, the neighboring ports s.The Takes to be smoothed.
Because pure CGIs still have this game look that is often prepared for the real scene through cooperation between the disciplines of the VFX: The car that umschmeißt the dinosaur, is really on the set.
Quote:
CGI gives film-makers greater control, and many Allows effects to be accomplished more safely and convincingly - and even, s.technology marches on, s.lower costs. As a result, many optical and mechanical effects techniques have been superseded by CGI.
This blanket statement is both correct as synonymous misleading. Visual Effects (; eg using multiple exposures) is probably really snow of yesterday. And even if today (even the simulation of the elements; appear fire, water, dust, wind, etc.) digital real than real, there are a lot of picture elements, whose complexity can not be satisfactorily simulated, and only in B-movies as be executed VFX. The Coronation of this complexity are indeed living creatures, respectively. People and enrich all of a film image by the chaos of chance, the interaction of light, texture and organic movements.
VFX s.meisten are represented there, where they did not notice: Look, background, decor, colors, wind and weather. The fantastic contrast relies much more to "analog" techniques, including masks, props, lighting, pyrotechnics, as one might think.
