Frage von tomster5:
Moin,
a question in the round. What do you prefer to animate in AE? the camera or the objects () in 3D space? Or a mixture of both? What did you do for experience?
MfG
Antwort von Jake the rake:
I think it is like real life: D
Intended to move the object, the object is moving, the camera move the camera, both, both ...
What a question ???????
Do you have a specific example?
Antwort von ummerland:
Hi,
You can pan for most / many digital camcorders forgotten anyway. These pictures look terrible. Analog still went. Therefore, since digital technology is either the object is moving or it is made of a tracking shot. Only times for 5 minutes a nature film, ... Television in schaun.
Antwort von Jake the rake:
Ahem, we are talking about cgi ;-)
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... You can pan for most / many digital camcorders forgotten anyway. These pictures look terrible. Analog still went. Therefore, since digital technology is either the object is moving or it is made of a tracking shot ... Although it has to do with the topic of this thread anything but still: How did you come on it that you should only rotate with analog camcorders, but not with digital? After all, yet experience shows that digital devices are working to create - why not synonymous?
Antwort von Jake the rake:
... You can pan for most / many digital camcorders forgotten anyway. These pictures look terrible. Analog still went. Therefore, since digital technology is either the object is moving or it is made of a tracking shot ...
Although it has to do with the topic of this thread anything but still: How did you come on it that you should only rotate with analog camcorders, but not with digital? After all, yet experience shows that digital devices are working to create - why not synonymous? Man, nowadays, not moving the camera through the forest, you move past the forest s.der Camera. With the film went even so, who has indeed synonymous, but moving digital, no chance, but we see clearly in all the new documentaries!
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Erstmal all objects always remain firm.
(ie the 3D Progi AE is only naja no preference)
So objects move only if they are to actually stop it.
Camera moves to several s.besten in a scene or switches to "Use the object as an Active Camera"
So now at work ....
In the end, the render .... only cameras (unless there are moving objects such as a car)
The Camera s.liebsten over fixed paths / splines move.
Or, for example s.Objekte "liable"
(Your car drives you doing ne 80 degree swiveling car faehrt loss, which is pursuing 2 nd Camera s.Auto hang)
............................
The real thing's just to answer your question this way. ... That if you even begin to work in 3D space in the "Depth" to .... you want to tinker your Modele very true to scale .... then you can stop bad as some make the whole scene turn.
Especially when light sources are placed s.Start.
So I move the camera, the better.
Was the answer for you ... ok so CGI enough ;-))
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von ennui:
Neither.
