Frage von tonk:
Hello people, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I've seen in Slashcam Test and Comparison in camcorder that has SonyNEX VG-20 in LowLight will test a "Very good". \u003cbr /\u003e The models also SonyAX2000 and FX1000. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e If one finds at Sony in "technical information" as a minimum illumination for the VG-20 9 lux \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e For the FX 1000 can be found as a minimum illumination 1 lux, the AX2000 need at least 1.5 lux \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e My Question: \u003cbr /\u003e why get the NEX VG-20 is a "Very good", although lie between it and the FX1000 total of 7 lux difference? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Thanks for your answers.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Theoretically, this could a.Fully engage the test criteria, which - Attention, speculation! - A camera then a "Very good" gets, if she manages with less than 10 lux. How much less the Lux are just in a particular case, then would be no preference for the note. More important seems to me anyway, but something else. \u003cbr /\u003e These official figures are namely Lux largely pointless, as is documented anywhere to see how an image should be, so it can serve as a benchmark. Perhaps the Manufacturer considers a particular lighting as sufficient, even where you'd be shocked if the bad image - or vice versa? Realistically, a rating for the test results are, and not what writes the Manufacturer, at its discretion in a prospectus. For the record daily life anyway you do it well, neither one
