Frage von Robby:
Hi
'm New here and time would need the advice of experienced people from this forum.
Of course, I've already looked around me, synonymous in the forum and read some articles.
Nevertheless, I have a few questions before I purchase the wrong stuff.
I work for TV and use mostly After Effects to create Opener / Closer, etc..
Now, finally bought a new calculator, with whom I can work properly.
Since I already possess some s.Software for the PC, is the "simple" solution to a G5
Now for me, unfortunately excluded.
That is why I have been ausgeguckt following things:
CPU 2x AMD Opteron 270 Italy 2.0GHz Box 2MB
Mainboard MBP ASUS K8N-DL nForce4 Pro 2200
Memory 2x SPE 2048MB Kit PC3200 Corsair XMS TWINX2048-3200C2
graphics card G256P XFX (Retail) 7900GT Extreme 520M 2xDVI/ViVo
Harddisks 1x 3.5 "Seagate 80GB (Retail) ST380013A-RK 7200U / m 8MB (system)
2x 3.5 "Seagate 80GB (Retail) ST380013A-RK 7200U / m 8MB (Data, Raid)
Video Card DeckLink (but what exactly would ran over YUV s.einen control monitor, Pro, SP, or EXTREME?)
Control monitor Sonyoder JVC (but which model?)
(it may be synonymous, or is it a used rather discouraged, should, if possible
not more than 1500 ¬ cost (rather only 1000 ¬), should show how many lines he can (600?)
would, of course synonymous can control the line flicker)
Would you be very grateful if you put me Could bewaren with your experience from serious errors.
Is the choice of components so ok, or you need something more irgenwo and s.anderer body
something less?
As I said, I'm really thankful for every tip!
Greeting
Robby
Antwort von PowerMac:
I would wait a month and buy me the new Intel Mac Pro.
Then you could use or even synonymous Premiere Avid.
More I could not help but to Frickelei;)
Antwort von steveb:
somehow "disturb" me of the AMD processor in this configuration ... (imho)
Antwort von Robby:
@ PowerMac
The same thing has got me by a colleague synonymous few minutes ago, because
probably in July / August, the new Intel enter the market.
Even the "Frickelei" he finds suspected dangerous. He said that one
with a workstation of HP or Dell would be better served, because there
1. Support the right and 2 the components are better coordinated and therefore it rarely comes to failures, which
during an urgent project can be fatal. Very true ...
@ Stefan
What are you would find better?
Once I decided, and the calculator is ordered,
I leave you, of course, share s.meiner joy ;-)
Find it even more synonymous corrosive, that in many threads, the final
Solution is missing.
Thank you erstmal.
VG
Robby
Antwort von steveb:
Well, the past has always shown that it is dealing more often with no incompatibilities with Intel solutions or had ... Most large software Manufacturers really prioisieren always running capability of the intel processors.
I would always work with branded components, but a certainty that "ready" systems "rounder" run as Home-made, I would not sign forever. My experience has shown that one should consult the Manufacturer of the software solutions according to your experience / recommendations. I have written at that time, in the search for a suitable solution to various graphics software Manufacturer and she asked for known problems. So I would say the focus of your to-use software and possibly her anmailen produktmanangement.
A Doppelraid makes sense, of Corsair memory I think is OK, with the hard disks I would at times "toms hardware guide" romp. Of the NLE editing cards, etc. I have no plan ... just as little as for external editing hardware such as monitors
Antwort von Robby:
Making it dependent of the SW I find ne good idea!
Werd mich mal use in conjunction with Adobe.
Gruss
Robby
Antwort von steveb:
If you should have not read that here ....
http://forum.slashcam.de/welchen-pc-als-videoschnittsystem-vt32296.html
Antwort von mkrawietz:
Hey THANKS, information (almost) no end :-)
The article I still know nich. Is probably because I tend to Article
I searched for After Effects. But what seems to DV editing requirements
does not apply to be so very different. Or?
Gruss
Robby
Antwort von Robby:
I should probably sign me in front of the answers, so I'm not only "guest".
Where have I am now a full member ;-)
Antwort von Nightfly!:
Hi Robby!
So, AMD Opteron or X2 is already OK.
The new Intel though are a bit faster, consume more electricity to be synonymous (above article is a bit outdated in this regard, since the currently rather stromsparen intel amd-chasing)
and are much more expensive.
AMD instability of the last century has subsided synonymous.
So what counts is performance footprint, price and electricity costs.
Gruß,
Nightfly!
Antwort von Robby:
Hi Nightfly
Had been properly considered synonymous synonymous (from experience) that
The AMD's stable are synonymous, and the performance of manufactures are well
(as can be seen
Antwort von Nightfly!:
Hi Robby!
Here are some AMD info:
http://www.golem.de/0605/45329.html
Here times a Small Graphic. Based on the percentages, and your daily computer use you can yes you the durchrechnen times.
http://tomshardware.thgweb.de/2006/02/03/4er_pack_amd_und_intel_server_im_kampf_um_maximale_virtualitaet/page16.html
Gruß,
Nightfly!
Antwort von steveb:
[quote = "Nightfly"]
So what counts is performance footprint, price and electricity costs.
quote]
compatibility is coming .... and before performance, price and electricity costs. :-)
Antwort von mkrawietz:
[quote = "steveb"]
So what counts is performance footprint, price and electricity costs.
quote]
compatibility is coming .... and before performance, price and electricity costs. :-) Compatibility and Performence go hand in hand. If Adobe would not program the applications per Intel, Intel would cut even worse.
So it AMD. At least in my opinion. Problems PP2.0 that deal directly with AMD processors (with SSE2/keine old) that I have not yet reached my ears.
Even if benchmarks were not noted:
http://tomshardware.thgweb.de/2006/05/23/amd_sockel_am2_athlon/page44.html
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/opteron-ws_15.html
Gruß,
Nightfly!
PS: In addition to the AMD-based plants in Dresden.
PS: I'm synonymous with my Intel computers satisfied ;-)
Antwort von Nightfly!:
As you can see s.der signature, I was! (Sorry!)
[quote = "Anonymous"]
So what counts is performance footprint, price and electricity costs.
quote]
compatibility is coming .... and before performance, price and electricity costs. :-)
Compatibility and Performence go hand in hand. If Adobe would not program the applications per Intel, Intel would cut even worse.
So it AMD. At least in my opinion. Problems PP2.0 that deal directly with AMD processors (with SSE2/keine old) that I have not yet reached my ears.
Even if benchmarks were not noted:
http://tomshardware.thgweb.de/2006/05/23/amd_sockel_am2_athlon/page44.html
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/opteron-ws_15.html
Gruß,
Nightfly!
PS: In addition to the AMD-based plants in Dresden.
PS: I'm synonymous with my Intel computers satisfied ;-)
Antwort von Nightfly!:
@ Robby:
Incidentally, this is a topic about which one could debate for hours and over again. So triff s.besten own your decision ;-)
http://www.slashcam.de/info/AMD-oder-INTEL---18540.html
Gruß,
Nightfly!
Antwort von Robby:
@ Nightfly
Is indeed true ....
But I wanted to start a thread here synonymous relating to "AMD vs. Intel";
but rather to know whether and how well the listed hardware for the
Use of After Effects.
To stop the CPU about our introductory offer:
I'll wait a couple of days and then probably just get me one of the new Intel
