Newsmeldung von slashCAM:\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von MarcTGFG:
- No 24p \u003cbr /\u003e - No 25p \u003cbr /\u003e - No 50i \u003cbr /\u003e - No 50p \u003cbr /\u003e - No 60p Full HD \u003cbr /\u003e - No Rec? \u003cbr /\u003e - Micro-input only paid about expansion \u003cbr /\u003e - No Kopfhoererausgang \u003cbr /\u003e - Maximum data rate for AVCHD only 20 Mbit / s \u003cbr /\u003e - Do not Focus Peaking \u003cbr /\u003e - Display only rotated but does not swivel \u003cbr /\u003e - No internal flash \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e + 5-axis image stabilization \u003cbr /\u003e + Relatively large battery \u003cbr /\u003e + Fast Auto Focus \u003cbr /\u003e + Continuous AF with tracking? \u003cbr /\u003e + Stable enclosures with a professional look \u003cbr /\u003e + Battery grip can be obtained \u003cbr /\u003e + Good High ISO performance? \u003cbr /\u003e + Compatibility with OM lenses \u003cbr /\u003e + Barely Rolling Shutter? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e All in all, Nix for me. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Still curious about the first video samples
 |
Antwort von Rafolta:
Possibly good for photos, but rather moderately bad video especially the handling of her. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Nevertheless, I am looking forward to a directly Comparison with the GH2.
Antwort von meawk:
Jo - does not look bad - the Fuji Pro X1 looks to worlds better. Good, the look is not necessarily so when the cameras the green front-ended reason to buy, etc., but if MFT, then it must yield was: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e First Film / Video \u003cbr /\u003e - Will be nothing but 60i/30p no 24p or even 720/50p, etc. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Second Photo quality \u003cbr /\u003e - Age of the Pana G3 sensor. Lt.. DXO-M ... worse than the GH2 the sensor, which is not surprised, because the MFT in GH2 is the measure of all things. . . Unbeatable in this respect, MFT synonymous in photo mode: The GH2 \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Third Enclosures Qualifiers \u003cbr /\u003e Very good, even robust, as can be seen on YouTube nice. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Conclusion: No purchase for me, because Stalin GH2 is much better Film-/Videokamera, followed by synonymous change this and next year is nothing. This is so
Antwort von motiongroup:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von meawk:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von B.DeKid:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von motiongroup:
are blind or have not understood my Question ... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e where did you get that .... I have it on DXO not found ..
Antwort von Bernd E.:
DxOMark has tested the e-M5 still not published and therefore synonymous norelevanten data. The assumption that this is in the Olympus sensor the G3-based, probably due to the fact that there both with the same resolution profit margins are listed. Exactly the same but have Sensoraufloesung e-M5 and GH2, so that one could take much more than their identical sensors. Definitely, there is currently no one knows outside of the companies involved, and tells about the image result is not too much of anyway.
Antwort von motiongroup:
That's why I said that the statement is Schmarn ... but in the INet was already confirmed that this is NOT the G3 chip ... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e In video mode, the GH2 be without any doubt a very good and the OM-D to prove himself first .. 1080p60 and 1080p30 synonymous with no ... no preference, I already interested in 720p60 or 720p30 .. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e and performance of the photo I'm convinced one way or another of Olympus.
Antwort von hlindner:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von B.DeKid:
\u003cdiv class=\
