Frage von thomasat:
Hello, I would like my soon to buy a new camera,
requires the high resolution of the new cams a faster pc?
I am currently with a panasonic nv GS11 movies.
If I am now the new cam with the same images played in mpeg format (dvd quality) on the pc, then the problem resolves itself in the editing and rendering of himself?
danke für eure hilfe
mfg
thomas
Antwort von steveb:
The question is ... what do you have now for a PC?
if you download movies, synonymous you film in PAL Resolution720x576. That will not change as synonymous with a new camera, except there will be an HDV camera. synonymous 3ccd cameras like Panasonic eg make it still a classic Pal resolution.
From a DVD or hard drive camera is still not advisable if s.PC to be reworked. Why? Because DVD complicate the PC Übetragung cameras and the DVDs themselves are not directly usable (they usually have to be ripped again) and a compressed video is of worse quality than mini DV. So ... take MiniDV.
Antwort von thomasat:
I have a pc with 2.8 GHz and 1.5 gb ram,
vga card as I have a radeon 9600 but the extent to which influenced me to edit the film is not clear.?
which brings me then a cam with three 0.8 million pixel? or 2megapixel?
if the film is taken up with only 720x576?
I'm going to buy a mini dv cam!
still a question to not be read off the analogue of the mini dv?
any loss of quality ...
Antwort von beiti:
which brings me then a cam with three 0.8 million pixel? or 2megapixel? if the film is taken up with only 720x576? Depends on the action. In any case, you will get a higher photo resolution. When Cam uses an electronic image stabilization, is synonymous some of the extra pixels used for this purpose.
will not be read off the analogue of the mini dv? If you are correct (do about firewire), is the transfer of digital and lossless. Should you actually know of your present action.
If I am now the new cam with the same images played in mpeg format (dvd quality) on the pc, then the problem resolves itself in the editing and rendering of himself? With DV camcorders do not even go. The ever give out native DV, which is then stored in the computer mostly as a DV-AVI.
A cut directly to MPEG (eg material of a DVD camcorder) is not only poor-quality, but essentially synonymous resource-sapping than the average of DV. For the cutting of DV sufficient to need, a PII with 600 MHz.
Antwort von thomasat:
which brings me then a cam with three 0.8 million pixel? or 2megapixel? if the film is taken up with only 720x576? Depends on the action. In any case, you will get a higher photo resolution. When Cam uses an electronic image stabilization, is synonymous some of the extra pixels used for this purpose.
will not be read off the analogue of the mini dv? If you are correct (do about firewire), is the transfer of digital and lossless. Should you actually know of your present action.
I thought to myself, the head of the analog readings from ... And then digitally transmits over fire ware.
If I am now the new cam with the same images played in mpeg format (dvd quality) on the pc, then the problem resolves itself in the editing and rendering of himself? With DV camcorders do not even go. The ever give out native DV, which is then stored in the computer mostly as a DV-AVI. I save my mini dv Cassette always the same as mpeg, so I done no bad experiences.
A cut directly to MPEG (eg material of a DVD camcorder) is not only poor-quality, but essentially synonymous resource-sapping than the average of DV. For the cutting of DV sufficient to need, a PII with 600 MHz. So that would render with dv avi go faster?
the only advantage of the MPEG format is the smaller file size?
Antwort von beiti:
the only advantage of the MPEG format is the smaller file size? Yes. The best videos can be as long as possible in a less compressed format (typically DV-AVI) and the MPEG2 compression leads only very s.Schluß through if you want to burn the finished movie on DVD.
Little background info: The small size of the MPEG format usdadurch is concluded that each contains only umpteenth stored Picture (I-frame) the full image information, while for the images in front and behind (B-frames, P frames), only deviations be saved. If you want to cut MPEG, the computer must calculate common intermediate, ie create new I-frames.
The DV-format stores, however, and compresses each frame separately. You can cut it without any loss of quality and einzelbildgenau with little computational effort.
Antwort von Burner87:
I now see no reason why you would need a new PC. As I said, the Avi-cut first choice, no preference with a 1 or 3 CCDs.
