Frage von Divin:
Hello s.die Community
I have read a lot and now feel more knowledgeable and, although still ignorant. Turn me in some way in a circle.
Zuersteinmal I'm looking for a new camera, which allows me homemade video for some time considered. I have very big problems to me a video of your traditional Cams regarded as the picture too blurry and I was apparently too much on most concentrated, ie,
very good image stabilization is for me the criterion not 300 ¬ Cams to stick with the.
My criteria:
[List = 1:8146 c93c7c]
[*: 8146c93c7c] Very good stabilizer
[*: 8146c93c7c] Lowlight good behavior
[*: 8146c93c7c] Währe Beautiful Night Shot (IR)
[/ List: o: 8146c93c7c]
I have spent last week the SonyHDR-CX 505 V favors, because you should meet my criteria well.
Then I read, however, synonymous of the SonyCX 305 performance, the ervorgeht of a contribution as a buy recommendation.
http://www.slashcam.de/info/Sony-CX305-oder-CX505-----Expertentipp-gesucht-410254.html
Yesterday I was in the Saturn and the two once had in his hand.
Test, I could join me this s.einen HD television via HDMI.
Have it done the following test:
In the neighboring corridor filmed and some trembling illusion that provided no direct difference. It is this promise that I was somewhat limited by the theft. 1st Is there a second line tuned a clumsy thing underneath that makes the best grip possible.
Then next to a distant object zoomed, though I could see a clearer picture in the 505 while the 305 performance was a little quieter.
The lowlight behavior can not exist in the bright space for free.
My impression
[List]
[*: 8146c93c7c]
per 505: Sharper Picture (higher resolution)
[*: 8146c93c7c]
per 505: More memory
[*: 8146c93c7c]
per 505: NightShot (IR)
[*: 8146c93c7c]
per 505: nice gimmick with GPS
[*: 8146c93c7c]
per 305: subjectively better stability in the zoom
[*: 8146c93c7c]
per 305: inteligente automatic (or has something like 505 synonymous?)
[*: 8146c93c7c]
per 305: Better WW
[*: 8146c93c7c] for
each 305: Faster Auto Focus (Saturn was synonymous with the Panasonic 707 in hand and that was synonymous slowly)
[*: 8146c93c7c] for
each 305: more cards listed (Storage Media)
[/ List: u: 8146c93c7c]
Sun then I'll leave this topic
http://forum.slashcam.de/ist-die-neue-sony-hdr-cx305-eine-quotmogelpackung-quot--vt79443.html?highlight=305
now I'm back again s.Anfang and tend to 505. Ask myself whether the stability was really bad at the 505 or my hand just restless.
At these places, I am relatively clueless.
Whether I have no preference of NightShott Genung is (I can not make two weeks with this experience and would like him to miss not really)?
Whether the 305 performance is significantly worse wirklcih in darkness?
Whether the gimmick with my GPS is important?
Whether the backup function so that I NEN USB stick into the Cam kan synonymous with the 505 is available, or whether I was ever with the FAT32 does (size smaller than 4GB)?
Whether I like about an alternative rather Cam, with at least equally good stability and possibly more favorable price synonymous?
Oh, and price I wanted to initially invest 500 ¬, because I have a Sony's very synonymous beiendruckt I go higher. The two cams are different web gerademal at about 50 ¬. However, should my cam be affordable, because I really only want necessarily the "best" stability.
I film on vacation, children in several camps / actions, to party's and "events" ...
So far I have shared with Cam's / s.end and borrowed the entire film cut. The Cam's take me to the point to shake its own, especially since the property is always reassuring than rented.
I thank Schonmal for any sympathy and certainly every commentators
Antwort von MiniBob:
Hi,
Funny, when I read your post here because I recognize myself for some time to myself again .... - Because exactly with these arguments and considerations, I had been employed between 1-2 months and very long "struggled "....
Final I recently bought it but the CX305.
Although synonymous me the NightShot function was very important / would be.
But in the end but has the wide angle, the compactness and the automatic function of the CX305 confident as a decision criterion.
Did not test much can can say so frankly not so much (and meaningful sound) to it.
Attempt to help (by meinerMeinung): STABILIZER = Probably a bit better in the CX305, but marginal, so therefore more likely to be considered as equivalent.
WIDE = Definitely better with the CX305. That makes a lot of practice!
LowLight = my opinion regarding equivalent sensitivity. The CX505 delivers seemingly little (minimal) more sharpness and color.
AUTOMATIC MODE = (iAuto Hat) only the CX305. Is a somewhat advanced feature of the normal auto mode. May be of benefit, who to make optimized shooting in different conditions like and / or value on face recognition / tracking sets.
GPS = Where only the CX505 (CX350 or the synonymous). So I see no real use for it for the movies later. Pure gimmick in the camera. Who's wants / needs ....
MEMORY: Advantage of CX305 that they synonymous swallows SD cards. However, the CX505 is equally synonymous 32GB internal memory (the CX305 only 16GB), which ranges usually synonymous for "normal behavior from film.
IMAGE QUALITY = See slashCAM-Comparison. I think both pers almost equivalent. The large sensor makes the CX505 because of little effective. I think the CX305 very well from the Picture. But the synonymous CX505. So I think patt!
As far as this.
As already said, I guess a little more synonymous the compactness of the CX305. But that is a matter of opinion pers.
Both are priced the way to almost have the same price (at least via Internet-Dealers and the "right time"), like this around 700 EUR.
My recommendation for you: If you are not interested in Wide Anglelegst, and NighShot you is very important (ie film in total darkness), then take your CX505.
Otherwise, I recommend the 2010s model CX305.
So, then have fun pondering and weighing .... ;-)
Regards,
MiniBob
Antwort von Divin:
@ MiniBob
Thanks for the feedback.
Your thread I had read and had me so synonymous brought to 305 performance.
I have looked at the picture in lowlight already. Extreme differences I see synonymous not only is it possibly in practice different, because as you noticed the one synonymous with good and the other had done very well with.
You've probably already in darker rooms or similar or filmed? If the picture is noisy or jerky? Jerky the picture at all when the cam rotates something? I've seen, it looks as if only then engages the stabilizer and then makes NEN jump.
Do you miss the NightShot yet?
Antwort von MiniBob:
@ Divin:
As I said, time had not yet had the opportunity to do so with the CX305 (they've only been couple of days!) to look more closely.
To your questions / comments:
Lowlight: Well, with respect to the assessment here LowLight I find a bit questionable sometimes. The fact is that the difference here btw "Very good" and "Good" can be only marginally - Both are really as good - the "Very good" is likely, therefore, the CX505 because the LowLight-picture is slightly sharper and color purity. (It seems to me that not so closely at me is more important that it is sensitive to light - and those are both probably quite identical!)
I have sometimes in the dark (that is more: low light) filmed. However, I have not synonymous Comparison to other current cameras. I think (in my then 7 years old to Comparison Camera), that nowadays the lowlight sensitivity is already quite impressive. But wait up to a certain extent.
And then she starts synonymous igrendwann see at Noise, yes! - But do it all! And when CX305/505 the noise is probably very low.
Well could I determine a jerk (not least on the camera LCD display). Neither in daylight or in darkness (not synonymous in the low light mode with 25 frames).
"Stabi-jumps" I could (as I said on the small display is not observed) apparent.
However, I believe that at fast pans with HD Resolutionimmer blurred somewhat smeared / s.Objektkanten ("inertia"). But I have seen in all HD cameras. This is be so. So nothing special of CX305 (or 505) at most.
And last: Yes. I miss NightShot!
(The time being, though only in thought, but I can already imagine scenes in future when I get angry that I have no NightShot more!
Since synonymous my project benefits not really something, to work with a small light MiniLED s.der Cam. Front mounted. Also, because IR just do not like it just fades to do such small LED spot lights ... - But after all, a small compromise ...)
Regards,
MiniBob
Antwort von Divin:
@ MiniBob
Thanks again.
With the background I'll grow me probably the 505.
Look at me again in reality.
Because of differences in the two cams for me not top things.
Your help was a great help.
