Frage von Operator:
Hello!
As a newcomer in a forum you have there is not necessarily easy to read because there are already numerous issues, and surely somewhere already hidden the information sought. After I with my search, however, was not particularly successful ... long story short, I just have to ask: I anticipated (37 years) I am going to choose my first video camera.
Therefore, it would interest me at first when it is for a Full HD Camera decides, then most people but 1080i (and not 1080p) have. How accurate is the case now with quality image reproduction / when I with 1080i and then films the video on YouTube as on a normal PAL or HD monitor reflect / TV want?
The problems I see:
The YouTube video is always progressive, if less synonymous.
The playback via Pal is also smaller, but is (presumably) interlaced.
So how does this look like in practice?
Are there any artifacts or problems? If so, how?
How does basically plugging such a device s.ein older TV?
As the conversion to 1080i is 576i?
And finally:
I like the SonyHDR-XR520 because of their low-light performance and the good image stabilization. Unfortunately, apparently takes only 1080i (or?). In principle, I would tolerate and even, as it usually leads to a more fluid motion playback, but the thing is, they want yes the artwork today in a resolution not only play, but on many different devices and platforms.
So I start looking for something synonymous to more or less equivalent camera models can display 1080p. Even the Lumix DMC-GH1 has fallen into my field of vision. Does not seem to stop really optimal for spontaneous video recordings to be, right?
Would be great if you give me suitable alternative or my concerns about the SonyHDR-XR520 and the interlaced Could scatter problem.
PS: For the cut - I will use software on Mac OS - I have already set out AVCHD into Apple Intermediate Codec to encode. Although I would prefer to avoid.
Antwort von meawk:
How does basically plugging such a device s.ein older TV?
Alone because of this question of me beommste no answer to your questions - this is not your serious?
Antwort von Operator:
Hello meawk!
How does basically plugging such a device s.ein older TV?
Alone because of this question of me beommste no answer to your questions - this is not your serious? Somehow I got the first answer presented differently, but so be it.
Perhaps I have misunderstood the question so formulated.
This means how this is handled with the interlaced format, if a FullHD followed CAM s.eine old tube. (That this is possible, I presume.)
Antwort von RickyMartini:
The HD picture is output via the analog video output PAL signal (SD) (PAL) devices. Done, the means of the internal D / A converter.
Antwort von Operator:
The HD picture is output via the analog video output PAL signal (SD) (PAL) devices. Done, the means of the internal D / A converter. Many thanks for the info!
But what happened with the Picture? That is interlaced in 1920 px x 1080 with every other row has a different frame and must be placed on the smaller analog format with 720 pixels x 576th
I suspect it will be easy to separate the even and odd scan lines taken from each other first to a picture together and then interpolate by Shrink. I couch it right? That would constitute at least for this aspect have a satisfactory solution.
What I will, however, is not yet clear, proceed like this (of Final Cut or iMovie) is when s.Computer scaled an interlaced format. - To avoid misunderstandings: I realize that there is a deinterlacer, but None of which is so perfect and the computational effort increases the synonymous huge.
What to do?
Antwort von RickyMartini:
To the deinterlacing in the editing software (Quell-/Sequenzmonitor) you need not worry - that is, no preference whether HD or SD - problems of the software itself regulated?
The skin is no deinterlacing today Calculator for more!;)
When exporting, you can, depending on the format, select interlaced or progressive.
Antwort von shipoffools:
Look at times, the Panasonic HDC-HS300 and HDC-SD300 at. Lowlight area seem to be synonymous not bad (3 image sensors) and provide a better test, according Slashcam Picture and many more manual controls than the SonyHDR-XR520. Possibly. in question is synonymous nor the Canon HF-S11.
Both the Panasonic as synonymous, the Canon can capture in 50i and 25p.
