Frage von fragmaniac:
For the United States were indeed already announced new models:
http://www.slashcam.de/news/single/JVC-Amerika-stellt-neue-Camcorders-vor-5696.html
As it looks now for Germany? On the German JVC-Page is available to nix enstsprechendes ..
I have to buy from me shortly publish a camcorder. DV - In and microphone input should be definitely turn. Sonyhat not sowas in my price range (= cheap as possible;)), which has now, according to Panasonic NV-GS37 DV-Page not - in, Mic-in yet. And the tests of the Canon MV960, I still want to wait. In the previous models, the 800 series of the sound was probably pretty bad, and the Wide Angleist at 4:3 unbearable. What is the in 16:9?
Now I hope that soon something JVC rausbringt in Germany, representing my ideas. The U.S. models are 16:9 (I would save my s wide-angle attachment), DV - In and Mic-In .. Would be exactly what I am looking for ..
Well, someone here has information, whether the cameras come out well according synonymous than PAL?
Antwort von DaMatt:
gr-d corresponds to the wish to serve 290 net?
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
VideoaktivDigital had shown the new models in Germany in recent / current output. But I still have any questions of my JVC representatives, as seems to be delayed.
The Wide Angled MV 9xx series is still just as bad as that of the old 8xxer.
In contrast, all 23 have synonymous, the new SonyHC / Panasonic GS 27, only the cheap Letterbox 16 / 9 mode, the Canon 's all the significantly enlarged wide angle.
About the sound you may argue, the one magazine said Good, the other misserabel, although it is the test with a rating of poor Computermag acted, as far as I know. A little more noise band, but have always had Canon.
LG
January
Antwort von fragmaniac:
@ Guest:
Yes, sure. But I thought the new JVC models might have got native 16:9 (in the U.S. Page was of "high quality") and I would therefore more auf'm Picture. So it is indeed in the 900-series of Canon. So I would prefer them well. Because of the tone I can hopefully advance look at the Cam at an electronics supermarket.
@ Jan:
Thanks for the (insider) information? Do you think I'm with the Canon in 16:9 then significantly longer in the picture than the Panasonic in 4:3? Or is that when Canon products so bad that it only affects the level of competition 4:3-Cams is (bildausschnittstechnisch)?
I recently got myself a Canon Cam on the 800 series looked at the Media Markt, which was s.so 's Test-connected TV. It looked like zooming in, but not wars ('ve got an extra lever checked), really terrible.
Now occurs to me now that I can be so easy again to go inside Media Markt and can switch to 16:9, to test killed. Would have to go, right?
Antwort von Jan:
Just as I do that you can see it already synonymous s.LCD, I take the camera, the smallest focal - 1x zoom and see (how much I have the right and left of it), the models with 4:3 as well as 16:9.
The new Panasonic GS 27 just as the SonyHC 23 (it would need to have the same as the old HC 17,19,22,32 = 41 °) have a very good image area at 4:3 (the GS 27 is even better than the GS 17,20,21 old and was already pretty good at 45 degrees) when we switch to 16:9 is exactly the same area only with the letterbox top and bottom, so no reels 16 / 9.
At Canon MV 9xx Scrolling is the same as the feeling of the 8xx (ca 32 °) in 4:3 mode, and that is really weak.
Only with 16:9 switch it because she is flabbergasted at the same time at about 41-43 °, because you can already speak of reels 16:9. Unfortunately, the Panasonic with 4:3 or Sonyschon that's why one could argue.
Your guess is exactly the MV 8xx and 9xx are at 4:3 a foregone ...... Wide angle, so Canon will appease the customer when purchase of a 850 with the included wide-angle converter ....
If you have to look at the JVC but the old GR D 239,245,27,290 and even Festplattencam MG 20 all have the same mode as letterbox SonyHC 23 and Panasonic GS 27th Perhaps the new better, sometimes have a look ....
LG
January
Antwort von prem:
Does the Panasonic NV-GS280 synonymous genuine 16 / 9. Wievuiel Wide Anglehat them? If the image detail is greater (16 / 9) than with 4 / 3. Is the 4 / 3 mode, wide angle good?
LG
The 1000th guest
Antwort von Jan:
Well, the "true" 16:9 mode gibts at the 2006 Panasonic's s.der GS 180th
The focal indeed is mostly in the manufacturing side, to gibts lists 50 mm Small has known, 47 °, I too am a little lazy and I noticed the wide-angle data of the Mag's. Since the test stand's yet I still have not made any Rechnereien.
One thing you can say this, but the Wide Anglebei 4:3 GS 180 / 280 / 300 has become a little smaller, but with 16:9 at all on it is more than its predecessors GS 75 / 140 / 150.
LG
January
Antwort von Basti vs. Sony:
Can you say with perhaps the same, how many degrees has the NV-GS280 in 4:3 and in 16:9 mode.
Or maybe you can tell me how to calculate the wide angle can?
The 1000th guest
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
If no exact Focal is known, the list may help:
CCD Size - Small Focal = focal If the exact focal is known (Small) then:
