Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hier geht es zur Newsmeldung: New round of Apple vs Adobe Flash: Open letter of Steve Jobs s.Adobe
Antwort von Meldur:
So slowly lose jobs once the grip. Who s.meisten popular MP3 device (I call this time "iPod") raises the market, which is exclusively of the proprietary software must be managed properly, which will remain nice and quiet times, when it comes to monopoly rights. The former rebel Microsoft has long been only based on profit maximization and regulation - and this in a way that MS and Adobe surpasses by far.
The editor's note regarding the distribution of business on hardware and software meets the nail on the head.
Antwort von deti:
I support the view that the flash technology is proprietary and closed. Flash comes from a time that allowed the open and standardized language elements of the Web is little scope for an attractive graphic design or more complex functions. So Flash has quickly become a de facto standard for Web applications. In the meantime, however, the open standards developed further, especially JavaScript and CSS to come, later of the SVG standard. The last revision of the HTML standard in version 5 provides now synonymous in the integration of audio - and video content. This is at the present time the last bastion of the Flash environment and thus a direct open competition with a proprietary system. Thus, the W3 Organization of the real competitor to Adobe and Apple do not! The reasoning of Steve Jobs, in my view in terms of flash technology means conclusive.
Whether therefore the invasive business model and application environment of the closed auto Apple will also find good, however, remains questionable.
Deti
Antwort von JonasB:
It is complaining about Apple's proprietary systems, I would not have thought: D: D: D
MFG
Jonah
Antwort von Marco:
There are only present no alternative to Flash, when it comes to produce interactive videos. At least not in the flexibility, functionality and simplicity for the customer as it offers Flash.
Marco
Antwort von Jörg:
This is typical of the reality of absence volksverdummender
Product strategists.
Antwort von Wechiii:
The Project of Apple - iAd - this is pure interactivity. And everything in HTML5. I think as the future goes ..
Greetings
Antwort von deti:
There are only present no alternative to Flash, when it comes to produce interactive videos. At least not in the flexibility, functionality and simplicity for the customer as it offers Flash. This is essentially a question of development! I think Adobe is synonymous here expand its tools accordingly, took place just as the integration of SVG already in CS2. It would surprise me greatly if Adobe is the development of HTML5 would refuse code. Sun Dreamwaver is already able to spend HTML5 (see
Flash will lose massively s.Bedeutung determined once the mainstream browser master HTML 5!
A good example of interactive HTML5 Video: http://craftymind.com/factory/html5video/CanvasVideo.html
Deti
Antwort von Mantas:
haha the jobs it has not all: D
'm curious when the problems finally get With monopoly and wonder why that always remain spared ...
Antwort von PUDU:
If flash is so bad, why should then programmed with Flash CS5 Apps will be sold in the appstore? In the current mirror by the way is a great article about Mr. Jobs.
Antwort von Replay:
Is so cute. igod criticized closed systems. People who live in glass houses ...
I have an iPod (iPod Classic with 120 GB, with about 90 GB of music filled) because there is no other player that has so much room and found the one with a song less than 20,000 songs in a few seconds and has three clicks. And one must not use iTunes (I use it but it is a very powerful program, which requires training). But otherwise I know not an Apple device, which I would buy.
What Adobe is the fact that Apple uses obsolete hardware? The iPad is based on an ARM Cortex A8, that is no longer a dewy Processor. ARM-based CPUs are synonymous, which can deal with hardware FullHD without pulling like crazy s.der Battery. These processors bring everything with, so synonymous graphics, decoding, memory, etc. These are so called SoC (System on a Chip). With Full HD can even have some mobile devices (hardware bypass).
The fact is that HTML 5 is the appropriate browser and of course, synonymous. The market will show where the road goes. Why does not the dear Steve to open a barrel.
And anyway, it's very good that HP has bought Palm OS and thus with Web extreme competition with Apple appears on the scene. Web OS is open, there is Ares, a browser application to the development of software for Web OS synonymous and the Software Developer Kit for Web OS can be had for free. A stiff headwind for Apple. Competition is good for business.
Antwort von Marco:
HTML5 binds a video but always s.einen Web browser and thus brings himself with unnecessary burdens. I know not whether this can be a substitute for a plain, but Interactive video format or even should. I think these are two pairs of shoes.
Marco
Antwort von Replay:
So I said yes, that is decided by the market. Requirements Is s.Interaktivität in a video, it stays Flash. If not, then the embedding by HTML5.
And so it is synonymous amount, regardless of what chisels igod his stone tablets. There is a very big world outside Apple, the iPhone is not (or iPad) are the only mobile devices and the Internet is still designed for "large" computer.
Just because the hysterical Steve does not want Flash on their devices, will not perish Flash. Such a power, Apple has thankfully not synonymous.
Antwort von Backslash:
Flash is so much more than just a "video player" and certainly not perfect.
If no one wants to flash, it will be done of all alone. alternatives are open SVG and SMIL.
Microsoft is trying with Silverlight, just as proprietary.
And the security may be synonymous with s.Battery properly.
HTML 5 is a Wiederspruch in itself and more a step backwards.
The whole letter is a bad joke stairs.
Antwort von deti:
Here comes the answer of Adobe's CEO: http://online.wsj.com/video/adobe-and-apple-ceo-square-off/5C074A32-B7A3-47EC-9B53-E7A8A5A04E49.html
Adobe strikes back
Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen responded in an interview (Flash video) with the Wall Street Journal on the accusations of Apple CEO Steve Jobs ....
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Adobe-schlaegt-zurueck-990743.html
Microsoft: HTML 5 is the future
After the exchange of blows of Apple CEO Steve Jobs and Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen in the dispute over Flash and HTML5 seized now synonymous Dean Hachamovitch, general manager of his label for Internet Explorer, the word ....
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Microsoft-HTML5-ist-die-Zukunft-990618.html
Deti
Antwort von boessu:
Hello Rudi
You write in your article that Apple deserves particular s.der Hardware and why so shoots against Flash. This was formerly Sun Today I would doubt it.
Apple deserves s.dem what the iApp store s.Umsatz Sun makes pretty good with practically no big effort to put there to get in. It even goes so far that when an app that allows in some form of money transactions, a percentage of sales part of this App s.Apple synonymous to go (much like credit cards). Only if you do nothing it deserves and it has nothing to do with money, then you are generous.
Why so many are upset s.dem iApp closed system such as Google's Android and find really great that this has much less restrictions. It explains synonymous the last change in the license for developers: it closes as it is clear gaps that were previously beyond the control of Apple. It is now possible in None manner more to publish a runtime environment for programmers as App and it shall be native and specifically for iPhone.
As for Flash itself perhaps the most important point that one iPhone with Flash a lot of apps in the Web is synonymous could make moderate, without an extra app you refer must have the store. It would not weigh on a Web Page with an extra iPhone Flash to do what would make a pile of apps simply unnecessary. That would be 100% in every way besides the Apple Kotrolle over. Seen in HTML 5 is indeed not a complete runtime environment but still HTML, and seen as much less dangerous for Apple as the Flash. Finally, it is the runtime environment (ie the browser) under their control.
Started the yes With the iPod, where you could relate music through iTunes quite easily. Even as Apple has, of course with deserved.
So I personally do not believe that Apple is still as before, deserves particular s.der hardware from the iPhone. It would not surprise me if it is above all the turnover in the App is it that causes the a killing. I once heard that the world would be worse off if Apple would have prevailed against Microsoft. Although the products Of Apple I think still are better, the attitude of Apple to the software vendors is actually classified as significantly worse and that's saying something.
Cheers
Bössu
Antwort von Mantas:
for the blinded
