Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hier geht es zur Newsmeldung: Next Final Cut Pro Update awesome "?"
Antwort von thenino:
For this purpose only this:
Antwort von rakzak:
this is so great! amazing! fantastic!
Antwort von mannamanna:
For this purpose only this:
Hihi, I'm almost always synonymous immediately tuned ... if I now Steve Jobs and awesome to hear a sentence ;-)
Antwort von 407621:
Bluray?? 64?? 3D?? - What should be there Awesome!
And again, 300, - for the update that is really none.
PLEASE PLEASE do not iPad, iTunes, iPhones anymore, but again proper software / hardware, with which one can work.
Antwort von WoWu:
Maybe they succeed so times to repair Quicktime to support AVC, upon conversion of 50p in an "i" format synonymous both P and not to use images only one to carry out a proper SD-image processing in PAL and not only in NTSC. ... etc.
If all of these fundamental problems would be eliminated, it would be really
awesome .... then you could use the program, possibly even commercially.
Still, it is indeed them have succeeded, to solve the problem ..... 8-10-8 bit Roundtrip after 8 years ..... anyway.
Oh .... I had almost forgotten ... QT10 you have to buy the MPEG2 codec is no longer synonymous with $ 29 extra .... woauuuu.
Antwort von Axel:
Against the Schicki-Micki products that will not have 407,621, I personally have nothing, but they have not synonymous and do not need them to happiness. To expect that Apple neglected this hype for a niche software, such as FCS, is only ääähm, naive? Saublöd? Call it as you want.
Final Cut Pro may not be perfect, you have raised a lot. Who wants to cut AVCHD natively, will have to resort to other NLEs. But synonymous with competitive products an average of only truly liquid with hardware acceleration is possible. The faster access to the material would be of benefit in the current reporting. But: Is AVCHD for this
at all a proper format?
AVCHD -
and Final Cut Pro users complain the way rare. Neither the ingestion of the footage takes an extremely long (~ real-time or significantly less, depending on the system) or the quality suffers from the conversion, rather the opposite (keyword postproduction).
Of course I would be delighted if BD, AVCHD and come 64-Bit. In the latter, it would surprise me if it were not so. The first two I would be surprised
if it were so. People, I can only say to increases, if you think you will happy with other software.
Antwort von lofi:
I remember only
Antwort von PowerMac:
Are you too stupid to read?
Antwort von Mantas:
Repair of gamma problems with h264 quicktime files would be a beginning
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Axel
It is indeed in some cases by elemental things, not by 64 bit or not.
Apple neglected, since there is Final Cut Pro either the European format (I remember years s.1 delay in 720p25) or just as simple nonsense, as the correct conversion of SD formats that do not work today. Or you can find the rejection of 25 frames in an interlaced format into production right?
And as AVC, so since the last millennium is the requirement and was known s.die HW (synonymous since the 90s) already offered in the form of DSP. The fact that Apple has finally decided to follow this step is indeed very laudable and promising synonymous. Only we should seek to blame synonymous wherever it occurs and not improved with a codec. I could understand even if it had been to VC1, in which everything was secret, until you no longer hide the real source was. But here is an open source.
So please, always along the truth. Not the codec's fault, but Apple, that they do not support it yet.
Time, quite apart from that now even the not so wealthy NLE Manufacturers have managed to acquire a license for it and there are more and more providers who are obviously not as hard as Apple is to deal with it.
And ... yes, you're right, who want new formats are working with, should of Final Cut Pro slow to adopt and I bet that was awesome his "will", is determined to be a new,
very stylish surface, which have for years big bugs are dormant, because Apple's interests has obviously changed over the years.
It seems to have now become Apple's understanding, to place as many children s.Markt toys and bright colors.
Antwort von Axel:
@ WoWu
Your perspective is probably that of a purely commercial HDTV producers, as I understand things. Let's forget for the moment that Apple stuff, maybe you can give us a true practice-Tip. My buddy lives in years of event, music videos and corporate videos to supplement that. Forget the times moment please your disdain for DSLR video, it is right now a hot ticket, so to date Quicktime H.264 particularly interesting. Also: use HDV, AVCHD, XDCAM EX. What can you recommend for software, customizable for Windows7, i7 Quad, configuration, hardware may not be too expensive. Requirements: Almost everything needs to be gecompt in After Effects.
Antwort von Alan Smithee:
@ Lofi:
In the linked article said that Steve Jobs has on the issue of the dismissed staff responded as follows:
"Folks who were left in support, not engineering."
To develop one does not need the support people!
It is likely that Final Cut Pro completely revamped to include some new Mac OS X to use technologies: QuickTime X, Grand Central Dispatch, OpenCL
Either one dabbles in such things merely a program and makes the program so badly maintainable and buggy - or you can renew the relevant parts of the program completely, which of course eats a lot of developer capacity.
The latter will probably be the way Apple does, and explains why the update of FCS is down 2 to 3 FCS not as extensive as might have the desired number. And that is synonymous to be the reason why Steve Jobs is convinced that the next version "is awesome."
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Axel
My view is not commercially .... either something is or is not. Bugs in software are but for me, "is not just"
And a picture can be so bad that you can recognize anything, or it may reflect that which promises the manufacturer (eg a particular resolution).
Now the consumer expects, as a commercial user that this is in, what stands out on it.
consumers do not differ so far of commercial users, except that people like me put his hand into the wound synonymous and synonymous say why it is that this is not it, what is it.
We have then chosen a HW NLE was ultimately only because we have seen time with the potential of the new codec and in time a (sustainable) codec were looking for.
In this respect, we are spared of the sluggish industry support in the consumer NLEs course.
If you ask me, then after such an NLE, you will not expect for example that I know all NLEs by the bank. Since you will not find anyone who has mastered the but from the findings and impressions I have received so far it seems to me VEGAS an attractive solution in a reasonable price range to be. Also the new version for me would AVID MC5 a choice.
And yet we gaze once synonymous, because what comes out on the subject of Light Works ... though I think because that "has been open source" with "free download confused.
However, I still find the DSP solutions as a good alternative, because the run in the processing (implementation) is still s.fehlerfreisten (and s.schnellsten). For the DSP Manufacturer were on time "s.Ball" and now have the chips as "bug free" as in software components is far from the case.
So rather a couple of bucks less for a "smart" surface (in case of poor implementation) and for a few $ more for the operation. That would be my motto.
@ Alan Smithee
It could be synonymous have a different reason ....
The new operating system architecture and the distribution of jobs on the multiple cores is even now not a new thing. Thus, Apple has already employed when they were partners at AMD. This should be done so with the mehrkernfähigen processors and the release of 10.6.
The fact that this architecture is necessary for AVC was known since 1995, about 7 years. That Final Cut Pro is still not supported is perhaps synonymous together so that Apple would be ProRES to see as well as his QUICKTIME like a (world) are well established standard. those were actually ambitions to s.denen Microsoft has already brought a bloody nose.
Now it's just not ProRess but MPEG4 become. Reasons are known.
So Apple will have to reach into the postage account and pay licenses s.all the companies have to hold the patents on it.
Bad for shareholder value.
