Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hier geht es zur Newsmeldung: Night vision for 750, - Dollars Noktor Hyper Prime 50mm F0.95
Antwort von Flyingdutchman:
Thanks, good tip! I'm curious whether the synonymous in the program receives any rental Berlin - unfortunately seem to be limited so far to Canon DSLR that stuff. But Germany is lagging behind the United States often produces mar. the acceptance of new technologies (such as Apple's systems), so who knows, vlt's come again :-)
Antwort von domain:
Noktor, Yakumo, Senko, Navitron, Tarcus. Probably all from the same Manufacturer, albeit in different versions.
http://fourthirdsnews.com/news/43rumours/everything-about-senkonavitronyakumo
http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11212&highlight=50mm
Antwort von ArnAuge:
My Nikkor 50 / 1.4, according to my information from open-aperture a depth of field of just 0.5 mm (!). Clearly, what we still feel as "sharp" is relative, and then measured the maximum permissible blur circle diameter.
Against this background, I wonder halt if such a large opening makes sense. An example would be interesting snippets of film.
Arno
Antwort von Mantas:
The question is in what distance you have your 0.5 mm ...
and clearly it makes sense to photograph you have not synonymous everything in 30cm distance.
Antwort von ArnAuge:
True, I have to give you right. In what concerns the removal of quoting my statement, I unfortunately do not know. For longer distances to infinity as it looks certainly look better.
Antwort von Flyingdutchman:
Synonymous, I do not know exactly how big the depths of field-clearance "officially" is on the frequency with my Sigma 30mm/1.4 - but subjectively fänd I sometimes better to have less depth of field. Is especially important for wide-angle lens so that the depth of focus tends to be large, even at fast Lenses.
But the whole thing hangs together, of course, synonymous with the sensor size - with m3 / 4 (nen GH1) There's always had a bit more depth than in full format.
50-I now use it virtually impossible, thought that Voigtlander has been the only company who offered a similar sowas aperture - but they are expensive.
What would be interesting to do a test with Voigländer Classic and the new candidates - are there any on the net?
Antwort von papcom:
what is a four / third Camera? I do not know which cameras belong to?
Antwort von domain:
The name comes of the 4 / 3 "sensors, these cameras here. Here, I would imagine the 50 mmm Brenweite all right, just because even a slight telephoto.
Also interesting for full-frame DSLRs, but not only due to ultralichstarken lens MTF, and although usually low synonymous dimmed. But might have a positive impact in the reduction of Alias | Wavefront Mayaing.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... what is a four / third Camera? ... http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-Thirds- Standard
http://www.four-thirds.org/en/index.html
Antwort von ruessel:
First time I would be interested in the image quality of the lens, such as CA, Krümmumg, image sharpness, Ghost etc.
Surely there must be diminished, however, spend 850 euro for an unknown Schnapsglasschleiferei?
Antwort von Flyingdutchman:
What's the matter with
MTF meant?
What concerns me, I would be interested in it mainly to be able to work effectively not just for high-priority background distances with depth of field, but synonymous with average intervals (so that for example at 6 mtr mtr. Sharp, and at 8th is blurred). I use this often has a bright super-telephoto (70-200), because the same synonymous telephoto hergibt nor sufficient depth of field - but then one is naturally confined to a narrow angle of view ....
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... What is it with ... MTF ... mean? ... http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulationsübertragungsfunktion
http://www.schneiderkreuznach.com/foto/mtf.htm
Antwort von Flyingdutchman:
've Found here (http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2009/11/16/the-voigtlander-nokton-50-1-1-lens-review/) a test of Voigtlander Nokton - there is possibly still other tests, but is on the blog soon synonymous nen Test of the new NoktoR follow (so far only photos / Filmpchen for the one who's interested)
Antwort von Valentino:
The optics provide even the physical reasons in an open Aperture sharp images is only logical.
Not without reason that highend lenses are like the Master Primes on a limited Aperture 1.2.
Kubrick at least since we know that you can easily make one synonymous with an Optics Aperture 0.7, but it says nothing about their quality better.
For 800 euros you can better buy a few good Festbrenweiten and then rotate in the post-s.der brightness.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
http://www.voigtlaender.de/cms/voigtlaender/voigtlaender_cms.nsf/id/pa_fdih7s8j2x.html
that should fit synonymous with an adapter
So, for example s.eine Olympus Pen E - P 1 or 2
Is synonymous not much more expensive than the one shown here.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von ruessel:
First test:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/03/02/first-look-at-the-noktor-50-f0-95-lens-on-the-olympus-e-p2/
