Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hier geht es zur Newsmeldung: Nikon D7000 test
Antwort von motiongroup:
us the video has now carved out from the stool? I'd say no, because to see is a lot better ..
Antwort von gunman:
Hi,
All well and good, for me this is not a "video" but a "slide show".
Gunman
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Sorry, but I see there is no video on Vimeo but ne slideshow
Those are photos and ne virtual camera and no video recordings?!
Or am I blind?
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von B.DeKid:
* I should write in front of the press refresh - Gunman was faster: - / *
Antwort von domain:
At least three settings have been filmed already, but the rest should come from actual photos.
Basically corresponds to the "Video" exactly the original intention of a DSLR with video capabilities: mainly designed for photos, but in between times for dynamic interludes, synonymous if they are only flying insects or migrating Lensflare.
I even believe that the assembly shown here could lead to many amateurs to a better result than pure video.
One might call this form of presentation as synonymous dynamically enhanced slideshows.
Antwort von cebros:
I mean, all images are s.Bildrauschen been shot in the video mode to identify insects and s.den. Man must look at the video in full screen, you can see it.
by the way is an interesting effect, which I have noticed a few times. Often there are only tiny, barely perceptible movements deliberately and faults that make up the difference between a "dead" Still Image and a "live" video. For this reason, I would, if possible, never install a still image in a video.
Antwort von domain:
You're right, I repeated the view now synonymous running water, can be spotted in the breeze moving cobwebs and more insects. Must be but overall was a very windless day, since there is hardly moving foliage.
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
Due to the small movement, the video says little about the efficiency of the codec with existing data rate.
The first real Comparison me a 7D/60D is probably very exciting. At least the data rate is at Canon so much higher.
I refer you again to review the following (!!):
http://forum.slashcam.de/test-canon-eos-60d-vs-nikon-d7000-vt84999.html?highlight =
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Treats the title once more a "0": D700 and D7000 are two different cameras.
Antwort von domain:
The first real Comparison me a 7D/60D is probably very exciting. Exciting would that be if a real time video, rotated with DSLR would be shown. As you have seen so far, moves so mainly at the level of not untalented photographer dealing with moving images.
Previous technical comparisons move in my opinion the forecast range, ie from one explores what a DSLR could do in an emergency. Only we have not seen anything serious, so no convincing-after area in which the technology is incidental and only to concentrate on the essentials so is actually on the film.
And since it is a huge difference between moving aesthetic photos and a lively video.
