Frage von xzenon:
Hi Folks,
I have a Panasonic NV-GS75. I'm pretty happy so far and I would not call Beginners ...
My The only "problem" is as follows:
When I record a movie with my camera and then by those with Premiere Elements 2.0, Firewire to record on my calculator, then the picture quality is quite ok for a while video enthusiasts ... But somehow there is a certain level in the Picture "unruhe. This can be roughly compared Stillimage if I shoot one with a 1.3 megapixel camera and then take this as a background image for my 19 "monitor ... but then I have no real" bildunregelmässigkeiten, "but it's not as easy as razor sharp if I have a picture with a 5 megapixel camera makes! Do you know what I mean?
Now the question:
If the simple fact that my camera is just a beginner model, or I do something wrong??
My pictures are, I guess DV-Avi (at least I can only select DV recording, and the file is 109MB in a 30 Sec. ... Great clip
I have not processed further compressed or something .... It is the raw material that is freshly landed on my calculator!
What can I do?? Other software?? Better Cam?? If so, what camera features a handy camera format comparable with noticeably better image quality??
Question 2:
where I am schonmal here ... the camera takes good quality so that the material in hindsight, I do not need more deinterlacing?? So frames ... And the whole s.besten under 1000 Euros!
So I'm curious times who can help me:-D
Liebe Grüße
Xzenon
Antwort von steveb:
404ERR
Antwort von Axel:
Salut,
synonymous my guess first on the display quality in Premiere as the reason. On the other hand, "Noise" is a good description of poorly lit images, please use the search function or Einsteigertips.
In principle, and not be questioned is the following, taken from expensive experience insight:
Never deinterlace, except for Webfilme!
On the question of a fall Vollbildcam me the Canon a XLs or the Panasonic AGX 100, all more than 2000 Ore. But I suspect that this inferiority complex question, so here are a priceless advice:
No doubt, shoot! A lot of filming. Seize every opportunity. No do
not make masterpieces, but
to many tests. In speaking, one learns to talk. Equipment should never be the excuse for the convenience. Many painters have tried over the centuries to make reasonable images. No wonder, yes, there still no Photoshop!
First of many superfluous mitfilmen. As you may (way) Cutting learn with time, will you shoot more effectively.
The recording quality of the camera is a criterion. But a secondary MUs. The excessive preoccupation with it is like once the hi-fi hysteria, in which the parties believed the waving of the baton to hear - difficult to see Andre Rieu in their record collection. It always goes up one step to happiness. See: "The Fisherman and his Wife"
"My wife, who Ilsebill wants nich so, as I probably will."
"Wat for Willse?"
"Se wants to be God."
Antwort von PowerMac:
Canon XLs only one or the Panasonic AGX 100 Canon XL1S, XL2. And Panasonic AG-DVX100.
Antwort von mkrawietz:
Unfortunately there could help me now None really ....
It is not the premiere, and not the bad image recorded material!
There are the obvious dots moving about easily reproduce the colors of my "disturbing"
Antwort von Axel:
It is not the premiere, and not the bad image recorded material! How do you know? But OK, times accepted. Then there are only three possibilities:
- Your 19 "has a fantastic resolution, which of course does not offer IR. The film can not help it, but you're a "dissolution-Heini)" (search function.
- The camera is no good or is defective.
- The material has been mishandled.
There are the obvious dots moving about easily reproduce the colors of my "disturbing" Pixel lumps? Stair nosing? Swarms of mosquitoes square? It all happens when the material is too often or too strongly compressed, it incorrectly imported or exported. At first I made the mistake of example, the finished movie with the Quicktime Conversion (Mac) as a DV movie (extension =. Mov equivalent. Avi) export, which does not mean that the material is simply
copied into a new file but obviously recompressed. The correct way would be to export as "Quicktime movie was" synonymous extension. Mov, but in perfect quality. That's all I say. Helps you think?
Antwort von mkrawietz:
So I see no lumps of Pixel, stair edges or flocks of quadratic mosquitoes:-D
Zm better understanding, I have a little video filmed reingestellt and following the link below!
ACHTUN: There is no DV Avi Avi but a compressed, but it is still good to recognize what I mean!
http://www.nandger.de/forumtest.avi
My concern is to stop the "blur" as a whole!
Antwort von mkrawietz:
Sorry ... It is of course a DV Avi! Just wanted to compress one, but since I had strangely interlacing stripes on it ..... no idea why!
Antwort von Axel:
Right, because it Resolutionhandelt are correct and I have described, of the compression artifacts are not there - I'm baffled.
The picture is simply a bit blurred. One would expect in the original resolution, at least, that the groves of poplars were better defined, the window crosses or the fountain sculpture. On the other hand you have it - like FinalCut Clipanalyse says, with medium quality encodes (???). The accuracy is, with the details in PAL Resolutiondargestellt, is relative. My own recordings (VX2000 determined, not a lame duck) have rustling in woods synonymous guess a lot of hands rather a direct Comparison would be useful only for the same design.
PAL's just the classic television format. If there is criticized on a standard tube televisions anything, it means you're either seriously over-critical and must be careful that you the dissolution of scale do not suffer delusions or go immediately to HDV, where the game of starting anew, since the Monitors and Television are the higher Resolutionangepaßt.
I found your camera at Google, a small 3-Chipper and certainly not bad. Perhaps a defect in the auto focus, try a look. Otherwise, I am, as I said, perplexed. Perhaps everything is in order, and the motive is just unfortunate at the same time with poor export settings.
Good that you have set the film. I propose a new thread:
"What went wrong here? (Sample movie)"
Antwort von mkrawietz:
Good idea, I like to do it!
Antwort von Nightfly!:
Moin moin!
It looks, in fact, slightly blurred.
Possibly. times with different settings or capture Importing with another program (possibly) even on another Calculator.
Otherwise, like Axel, but otherwise have suggested testing the same device in Comparison (possible Autofocus Bug / very rare)
Gruß,
Nightfly!
Antwort von Nightfly!:
Hello Mark!
Here is a duplicate thread:
http://forum.slashcam.de/was-lief-hier-falsch-beisp-video-vp152674.html#152674
Gruß,
Nightfly!
Antwort von mkrawietz:
Not petzen!
The other formulation already makes sense.
Antwort von mkrawietz:
could an admin please close this post because my other current and is focused on the topic!
Thank you:-D
