Frage von DocDoom:
Hello,
have relevant knowledge in photography. Now we get young, and I decided to buy myself a camcorder. Professionally, the whole thing should not degenerate and that is why I have decided for the Canon MV790 Pal. However, I would, of course, the maximum possible rausholen from the material. 've Tried some things, but not cancel a so throughout. Would be nice if you would take the time to help me a little bit on the jumps. I therefore work with the MV790, Pinnacle Studio 9 and an Athlon 3000 with Sata Raid.
What I have said so far:
The camcorder I've only once left just about everything on the car. Synchro long I've turned off, as the digital zoom.
Since I have a 16:9 TV, I stopped at Auzeichnung WIDE. With these settings, I've only times 4 min test film rotated. (2 min indoor, 2 outdoor min)
Then I transferred the film with Studio 9 on the PC. Settings:
DV quality
PAL
(Pinnacle has recognized the independent and properly WIDE eingstellt)
Thus, the quality is not quite convince me. Ok, with a few artifacts, I can live and synonymous with a bit of tape running noise on the film, and with minimal delay autofocus. What bothers me is when I swing it the nachschliert the Picture. I would like to leave.
Now my questions:
Does it have drawbacks if I record to WIDE, the picture of liquid when I leave at 4:3?
It brings something to set the shutter speed yourself. All right, 1 / 250, would then streaks away?
I have the film properly imported into Studio 9?
Does anyone else have any tips how I could improve my results?
Help would be nice if someone could s.Anfang something. Even though it might for you what's what is crystal clear, I could help it I think. At least until I have penetrated deeper into the matter.
All the bother to answer me: THANK YOU!
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
The problem is that the older 700 series only a pseudo MV 16:9 mode and has the range or wide Anglegleich remains, except the black bars above and below.
From the new current 800 series, too (special model 790) is the Widemodus quickly apparent when you switch, that is the host range is significantly greater, and that a 16:9 significantly closer. Unfortunately, the wide AngleMV 800 is only 32 ° at 4-3 was actually quite weak (Panasonic GS 17 that is orderly at 4:3 45 °!), And only with 16:9 wide mode.
As you with your program anyway with the 16:9 treatment with the MV 700're happy, I can not say. Here in the forum gibts but a couple of software's Special.
LG
January
Antwort von DocDoom:
Re
Thanks for the reply only once. Would then take up to 4:3 and with the bar on the right and left to live. Because the pseudo 16:9, I can dispense then synonymous. But Nachschlieren I still find it very worrying. Since I have a Canon S2 IS Fotocamere with a better video image ...
Antwort von DocDoom:
Re Re,
mh, again s.alle specialists
Which is better the Canon MV 790, Wide or 4:3?
Antwort von GhostDog:
But Nachschlieren I still find it very worrying. Where it occurs on the nachschlieren? On the computer monitor or in the finished rendered movie on CD / DVD?
I also use Studio 9 and got to the Canon MVX200. Even with me is not the Picture s.Monitor sooo intoxicating (nachschlieren during fast movements), edge sharpness. If I as a VCD or SVCD and render me then look s.TV, so the quality is absolutely fine.
Guest (roenterologe)
Antwort von DocDoom:
Re
to see s.Monitor worse s.TV low.
Furthermore, I now wonder what is better DVD or SVCD ...
Are there any filter of Studio 9 recommended to improve the quality?
I figure the only, or does the image stabilization with 4:3 shots better than 16:9? In what format would you record?
Antwort von Markus:
Furthermore, I now wonder what is better DVD or SVCD ... Hello Oliver,
This question can be answered easily: The
DVD(- Video )SVCD. Even the DVD for better compatibility with standalone DVD players as has the SVCD.
Antwort von DocDoom:
HI
habs me thinking though, but questions costs nothing, thank you!
