Frage von DezorianGuy:
Hi!
I'm considering some Premier Support hardware accelerators to obtain, for Premiere CS4 jerky and invites me too much, and encodes an eternity.
What would you recommend? What are preisleistungsmässig up to 300 euro to have? possibly synonymous needed ...
zb
http://www.testberichte.de/p/nvidia-tests/quadro-fx580-testbericht.html
or amds
FirePro V3750
brings such a special card benefits derived from after effects and premiere (liquid preview, etc)?.
Antwort von Arminius09:
What do you cut? DV, HDV, AVCHD, or ...
For CS4 and AVCHD with a budget of EUR 300 would, in my view, only the re-coding into a more easily editable format into consideration (eg Neoscene, Canopus Edius Neo on HQ)
Or do you buy and forget Premiere PowerDirector 8 or LoiLo and GraKa with a new NVIDIA CUDA support. Maybe your current card even supports CUDA.
The Quadro FX support for Premiere (CS4) will only pass on the FX 1800 release and will cost approximately 500 EUR. However, as synonymous only Herausrendern accelerated, not the preview (to my knowledge).
If you want to cut CS4 with AVCHD you have more money in your hand
greetings
Armin
Antwort von RickyMartini:
When your system with an Intel Xeon 3Ghz is quite sufficient for the liquid AVCHD editing with PPro CS4!
The C2D E6400 is too slow.
Antwort von Arminius09:
Do you as the Intel ® Core !" 2 Quad Processor Q9650? The cost about 260 to 280 EUR for the boxed version. Yes that should fit in the socket 775 as the C2D E6400.
Do not you think that then still an additional graphics card with higher memory access is necessary or makes sense? With me was after installation of the GTX 260 with 448 bit further enhanced preview performance detected bit (compared with an ATI 128).
This indeed synonymous here with slashcam this article:
http://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Tips/Premiere-CS4---schnell--an-gemerkt--Teil-2---Vorschau-optimieren.html
Antwort von RickyMartini:
The Q9550 @ 3Ghz and more there is quite enough (about 180 ¬)! The Quadro comes with CS4 only when exporting used. A 8800GT is therefore perfectly adequate!
Antwort von DezorianGuy:
So, is the one Quad Q9950 @ 3Ghz CPU? Then of course, I would just need an appropriate Mainbboard. Or should I get the the "i7" zb?
Oh yes, my Grakarte has 256-bit frame buffer on and dominated cuda.
What brings me premiere cs4 cuda with the present condition, or in the state, if I would change what s.meinem system (eg new cpu, grakarte)? Or should I get a Quadro (a little)?
But then I would want to stay at Premiere CS4.
What can be done?
Antwort von Arminius09:
The Q9950 is a quad-core CPU and was supposed to fit on your motherboard, because you've stuck now a DualCore6600 on your motherboard, and both are sitting in Socket 775 motherboards. I would still consider again the exact specifications of your motherboard to see if is necessary if a BIOS update.
With a switch to an i7 platform, you'd possibly be better positioned for the future, but then you need quite sure a new motherboard. I would probably try erstmal with the CPU as it has proposed RickyMartin.
When GraKa has bit of a memory bus 256, which is synonymous okay.
Cuda gets you in this combination (Geforce8800GT and CS4) nothing. CS4 is currently only when using a Quadro card (min. 1800FX for 500 euros) Cuda and then accelerated synonymous only the output of the film, not in the preview.
Your graphics card would be of me, but the above Programs Cuda accelerate. But you will indeed work with Premiere.
Or written, as we have already had to convert not edit AVCHD natively (with CS4) and previously in a different format. Then you'd have nothing to change any s.System. In addition to event. a larger hard drive, as these files require a multiple intra-s.Seicherplatz.
Antwort von DezorianGuy:
Thanks for the helpful answers. I will make my way straight to the one above zuzulegen quad cpu.
I hope my Asus p5wdh-deluxe enough for that. Have by the way only a dual 6400er, no 6600th ;)
I stupidly forgot to mention that I made with clips I have my hv20 to edit, like. So no AVCHD.
However, I see my views on this cuda programs, ... Who knows whether that was any good: O
A final question: Why does Premiere CS4 does not support cuda, as (other Programs do so, well, I could just asking-along, why adobe does not support 64bit has donated )...?
Antwort von Arminius09:
I hope my Asus p5wdh-deluxe enough for that. Look at just relax on the website of Toshiba for before you go go. And look after the BIOS updated! You ought to consider before.
See a time synonymous with:
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/showthread.php?t=610487
I stupidly forgot to mention that I made with clips I have my hv20 to edit, like. So no AVCHD. That was but my first question! You remember?
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Thanks for the helpful answers. I will make my way straight to the one above zuzulegen quad cpu.
I hope my Asus p5wdh-deluxe enough for that. Have by the way only a dual 6400er, no 6600th ;)
I stupidly forgot to mention that I made with clips I have my hv20 to edit, like. So no AVCHD.
However, I see my views on this cuda programs, ... Who knows whether that was any good: O
A final question: Why does Premiere CS4 does not support cuda, as (other Programs do so, well, I could just asking-along, why adobe does not support 64bit has donated )...? For HDV but from your CPU actually goes quite well.
If you want to use in PPro CS4 CUDA for export, must be bought for a lot of money and a suitable Quadro to the plug for about 300 ¬.
With Photoshop CS4 only as 64-bit version is now available. Otherwise, all CS4 parts are designed to run 32bit and of course synonymous Vista/W7 on 64bit systems.
After Effects CS5 we give it only as a 64-bit version.
Antwort von DezorianGuy:
Well, I windows7 contain old 64bit on a newly bought disk and play it jerky is still within the working plane in the premiere.
only the preview video (runs smoothly without previous rendering), then it is jerky after and after, the tone is ...
So I wanted to make nails with heads, because I have no more time-consuming work with me to torture operations. I need (if I remember rightly) recall 3x longer than with CS3 then. Just why this is? An attempt would then update the cpu, because the present "old" seems ... or simply a nvidia quadro card, but as I listen to seems unaffordable.
hard drive / PC is defragged, checked (smart progs), virus-free and stable. What to do? My PC plays s.sich of even the ultra-large HD movie from a liquid without a murmur. However, once in Premiere, sag performance.
Would I give a definite speed advantages i7 9200 eg, fluid play of un-gerendederten sequences (including music track etc)?
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Again, the Quadro would bring you as much as a fish stick in the PC - nothing about the average performance! When HDV playback jerky so much, is it possible s.falschen system.
It seems as if you had
the ForceWare for the 8800GT is not installed or there are no optimal audio drivers on it.
A Q9550 is not a bad choice because it is not yet board + RAM must change in order to obtain more power to ordinary.
Your E6400 with the 2.128 GHz could be synonymous to 2.8 to 3Ghz pretty simple overclock via the BIOS.
8 x = 2.128 Ghz 266Mhz <- default
8 x 333Mhz = 2.664 Ghz
8 x 350Mhz = 2.800 Ghz
8 x 375MHz = 3,000 GHz
Antwort von DezorianGuy:
Well, then it should be the Q9550, unless the other does not cut technical advantages for the Money.
I have the latest nvidia drivers on it of the page. Audio driver of my creative xfi fatality Platinum is a tweak-driver, think of the wars: http://www.hardwareboard.eu/downloads.php?do=file&id=69
I wish I could get it checked the PC somehow, occurring only in regard to the premiere performance degradation.
